Chapter 9: Emotions in Social Relationships Flashcards
Week 5: Emotions in Communication
Stephanie Coontz
outlines the historical evolution of marriage
principles of sexual love
the initiation of romantic partnerships is influenced by two primary emotions:
- sexual desire
- romantic love
sexual desire
characterized by sexual interest and ideation, is initially responsive to cues of physical attractiveness and signals of youth, strength, and power
uniqueness of desire
emerges as a crucial factor in the early stages of romantic attraction, fostering long-term bonds
romantic love
as partners spend more time together, sexual desire can transition into romantic love, characterized by deep intimacy, devotion, and commitment
gender differences in sexual desire
- women desire is related to intimacy
- men desire is related to sexual intercourse
responsiveness
being attentive to each other’s emotions
resolution
collaborating to address stress
maintenance
finding ways to build affection and commitment
toxic emotional behaviors predict divorce
“the four horsemen of the apocalypse:
- criticism
- defensiveness
- stonewalling
- contempt
couples exhibiting these behaviors are more likely to divorce
cooperation
plays a crucial role in human evolution
gratitude
identified as a moral emotion that binds people together in cooperative social living
3 functions of gratitude
- acts as a barometer, helping individuals keep track of cooperative and non-cooperative friends
- gratitude motivates altruistic behavior by fostering generosity, favors, and expressions of appreciation, critical for maintaining long-term commitments among friends
- expression of gratitude, whether verbal or nonverbal, serves as a reward, reinforcing cooperative behavior and increasing the likelihood of future collaboration
emotional mimicry
the unconscious imitation of others facial expressions, postural movements, tones of voice, and gait, is a significant aspect of social interactions, particularly in forming and strengthening friendships
power
defined as the capacity to influence others, considered a fundamental element that shapes our interpersonal interactions in various relationships
the first perspective to explain the relationship between power and emotions
the first perspective suggests that our experiences and expression of emotions play a role in negotiating our rank, status, or relative power within social hierarchies. in this view, emotions help individuals assume power-related roles in social structures, whether as a parent, manager, or woman
the second perspective to explain the relationship between power and emotions
the second perspective reverses the causal order, proposing that power-related dynamics within social hierarchies influence appraisal, experience, expression, and physiology of emotions. this approach emphasizes the impact of power dynamics on the emotional experiences and expressions of individuals within social settings
social rank theory of emotion
power or powerlessness is intertwined with the experience and expression of certain emotions like shame, embarrassment, pride, and envy
social rituals
including expressions of grief, joy, and allegiance, often revolve around emotions that solidify group members rank within social hierarchies
Emile Durkheim
a pioneering social scientist, emphasized the role of collective emotions in shaping our group identity. coined the term ‘collective effervescence’
collective effervescence
used to describe shared emotional experiences during group rituals, fostering greater solidarity
group-based emotions
emotions that individuals experience as a result of their identification with a social group. they are tied to the individual’s perception of the group’s successes, failures, or actions
collective emotions
emotions shared and experienced by a group of people simultaneously. they arise from a shared experience and are expressed collectively, often amplifying the emotional response
awe
characterized by the feelings of being in the presence of vast things that are not immediately understood
anger directed at the out-group
more likely when individual group members perceive their own group as strong compared to the out-group, especially when they strongly identify with their group
infrahumanization
individuals tend to attribute animal-like qualities to out-group members, denying them full human attributes