Chapter 8 Flashcards
4 types of responsibility centre
cost centres - management are responsible for costs only
revenue centres - - management are responsible for sales only
profit centres - management are responsible for profit
investment centres - management are responsible for working capital and profit
formula for ROI for an investment centre
controllable divisional profit / divisional investment
what should you compare ROI to
PY or a target
what is dysfunctional behaviour
when a manager only makes decisions that will increase divisional ROI which may not be at the benefit of the company as a whole
is RI less likely to cause dysfunctional behaviour over ROI, true or false
true
what is more commonly used, RI or ROI
ROI
Advantages of RI
RI increases when investments above cost of capital are undertaken
RI increases when investments earning below the cost of capital are eliminated
RI is more flexible
weaknesses of RI
does not facilitate comparisons between companies
can be difficult to decide on an appropriate measure of capital employed
why is ROI more commonly used
ratio’s are easier to understand and can be used to compare
RI is complex and time consuming
a company may feel the dysfunctional behaviour associated with ROI will not happen
formula for EVA
net operating profit after tax less a capital charge
capital charge = WACC X net assets at start of period
difference in profit used for EVA (NOPAT)
add back any expenses that are to do with investments in the future
cash basis not accruals basis
depreciation added back and economic depreciation deducted ( if not included question just use normal depreciation)
tax paid is deducted from profit
what does NOPAT stand for
net operating profit after tax
approach to calc PAT (profit after tax)
add back : goodwill amortised R&D and advertising non cash items depreciation interest (net of tax)
advs of EVA
maximises shareholder wealth
replaces multiple goals with one financial measure
consistent with NPV
removes distortion from accounting policies
disadv’s of EVA
complex
based on historic data
makes interdivisional comparisons difficult
inconsistent with published FS