Chapter 7: The Trait Approach Flashcards
what do trait psychologists do?
identify characteristics that can be represented upon a continuum
who can be placed on a continuum?
we can take any person and place them somewhere along the continuum
distribution of people on a continuum
Personality traits are normally distributed
trait
a dimension of personality used to categorize people according to the degree to which they manifest a particular characteristic
two assumptions of the trait approach
- Personality characteristics are relatively stable over time
- Personality characteristics are stable across situations
personality in old age
our personality continues to develop as we move into old age
goal of trait psychologists
predict how people who score within a certain segment of the trait continuum typically behave
the significance of people’s score on a trait measure
lies in how the individual compares with other people
psychotherapy and the trait appraoch
No major schools of psychotherapy have evolved from the trait approach
Gordon Allport’s life
- Published the first recognized work on traits by a psychologist
- Taught the first college course on personality in 1925
Gordon Allport on psychoanalytic theory
Rejected much of psychoanalytic theory
Gordon Allport on the limitations of the trait approach
Acknowledged the limitations of the trait approach
What did Allport consider to be the limits of the trait approach?
- Behaviour is influenced by a variety of environmental factors
- Traits are not useful for predicting what a single individual will do
Allport on the nervous system
Believed that our traits have physical components in our nervous system that scientists will one day develop technology advanced enough to identify
Allport’s two approaches for investigating personality
- Nomothetic approach
- Idiographic approach
Nomothetic approach
all people can be described along a single dimension
Idiographic approach
identified the unique combination of traits that best accounts for an individual’s personality
common traits
traits that presumably apply to everyone
central traits
the 5-10 traits that best describe an individual’s personality
cardinal trait
a trait that dominates a personality
does everyone have cardinal traits according to Allport?
no, this only occurs occasionally
secondary traits
traits that describe one’s personality, but are less important than central traits
advantage of the idiographic approach
the person, not the researcher, determines what traits to examine
Henry Murray
Developed an approach called personology
Henry Murray on psychoanalysis
- Proposed a blend of psychoanalytic and trait concepts
- Studied extensively with Carl Jung
what did Henry Murray develop?
Developed the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), which is designed to get at material not available to conscious thought
psychogenic needs
a largely unconscious readiness to respond in a certain way under certain conditions
what are the basic elements of personality according to Murray?
psychogenic needs
how many psychogenic needs are there?
27
Murray on needs
everyone can be described in terms of a personal hierarchy of needs
structure of an individual’s hierarchy of needs
Each person’s hierarchy compares the strength of their traits to their other traits, not to other people
press
the situation
what determines if a need is activated according to Murray?
the press
Raymond Cattell
- Argued that psychologists should not begin with a preconceived list of personality traits
- Believed that many personality traits are related
factor analysis
the statistical technique used by Cattell in an attempt to discover the structure of the human personality
limitation of factor analysis
the procedure is confined by the type of data chosen for analysis
source traits
the basic traits that make up the human personality
how many traits did Cattell identify
16 basic traits
what did Cattell develop?
Created a personality test called the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16 PF), a measure that provides scores for each of the source traits
1949 veterans study
conducted extensive personality assessments of 128 men who had been admitted into the Veteran Adminstration’s clinical psychology training program and found that there were five basic personality factors
what were the five factors Fiske found?
- Social adaptability (talkative, makes good company)
- Emotional control (easily upset, has sustained anxieties)
- Conformity (ready to cooperate, conscientious)
- The inquiring intellect (intellectual curiosity, an exploring mind)
- Confident self-expression (cheerful, not selfish)
Fiske’s findings today
foreshadowed the direction personality research would take
the Big Five
five basic dimensions of personality that many different teams of researchers have found evidence for
neuroticism
places people along a continuum according to their emotional stability and personal adjustment
high in neuroticism
frequently experiences emotional distress and wide swings in emotions
low in neuroticism
calm, well-adjusted, and not prone to extreme emotional reactions
negative emotional states across situations
People who are prone to one kind of negative emotional state often experience others
extraversion
places people on a continuum according to their level of sociability
high in extraversion
sociable, energetic, optimistic, friendly, and assertive
low in extraversion
reserved, independent, even-paced
extraverts vs. introverts’ friendships
Extraverts have more friends and spend more time in social situations
openness
places people on a continuum along their level of openness to experience
high in openness
an active imagination, a willingness to consider new ideas, divergent thinking, and intellectual curiosity
low in openness
prefer the familiar rather than seeking out something new
intelligence and openness
Some researchers refer to it as intellect, but it isn’t the same thing as intelligence
agreeableness
places people on a continuum according to their levels of softheartedness and trust
high in agreeableness
helpful, trusting, and sympathetic
low in agreeableness
antagonistic and skeptical
agreeableness and social interactions
People high in agreeableness have more pleasant social interactions and fewer quarrelsome exchanges
agreeableness and helping those in need
People high in agreeableness are more likely to help those in need
conscientiousness
places people on a continuum according to their levels of control and self-discipline
high in conscientiousness
organized, plan-oriented, and determined
low in conscientiousness
careless, easily distracted, and undependable
conscientiousness and health
People high in conscientiousness tend to be healthier and live longer than those low in this dimension
ongoing questions related to the big five model
- There is some debate about what the five factors mean; they may simply represent the adjectives available to us in our language
- There is some disagreement about the structure of the five-factor model
- Does our personality change as we age?
- Would psychologists be better off relying on only five main traits instead of the hundreds of smaller traits they now use?
big five and language
Numerous studies indicate that the Big Five does not merely reflect the structure of the English language, but appears to be a universal pattern for describing personality
disagreements of the structure of the five factor model
- Some factor-analytic studies have found evidence for 7, 6, 3, 2, and 1 basic factors
- Different research outcomes might reflect differences in how broadly investigators conceive of personality structure
personality as we age
Our personalities become fairly stable in our 20s and show little signs of changing after age 30
the big five and aging
- Older adults tend to be higher than younger adults in conscientiousness and agreeableness
- People tend to become lower in neuroticism as they move through adulthood
Would psychologists be better off relying on only five main traits instead of the hundreds of smaller traits they now use?
- Examining a specific trait is better for predicting relevant behaviours
- However, using the Big Five can be useful for diagnosing clinical disorders, working with therapy patients, and identifying problematic health behaviours
Mischel’s Criticisms of the Trait Approach
- Trait measures do not predict behaviour well
- There is little evidence for cross-situational consistency