Chapter 2/3 (week 2) Flashcards

1
Q

Why should we not rely on personal experience over research?

A

Experience has no comparison group and is confounded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is a comparison group important when conducting research?

A

Because what if there is a better method/solution than the initial one used? Ex: radical mastectomies vs simple mastectomies. Radical were used for years but after a long time simple ones were found to do the exact same thing AND save the lymph nodes and chest wall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Confound

A

a potential alternative explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does it mean that experience is confounded?

A

We can be biased in what we think causes an outcome, but there’s usually confounds that we didn’t eliminate. Ex: a bath at bedtime is what helps my baby sleep better. Could it really be due to your interaction with the baby?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

6 points that make research better than personal experience

A

-comparison groups
-rules out confounds
-dig deeper
-looks at weight of evidence
-theory-data cycle
-publication/peer-review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Although we know research is better than personal experience what is one thing to keep in mind about research?

A

Scientific findings are not expected to explain 100% of cases. There are always exceptions and research is probabilistic!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4 things to consider before trusting authority figures

A

-source of their ideas?
-did they provide subjective/personal opinion?
-they may be biased
-different authorities may disagree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Halo effect

A

people who think that since they excel in their field they excel in all fields

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

consensus/common sense

A

accepting a conclusion because it’s accepted by the majority of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

famous example of a consensus that’s actually incorrect

A

“opposites attract” is widely believed but there’s actually research that supports the opposite.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

intuition (in research)

A

believing something based on a gut feeling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what’s the main limitation of relying on intuition?

A

it’s often biased and can lead to worse decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

4 non-scientific sources of knowledge

A

personal experience
authority
intuition
consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

5 forms of intuition bias

A

present/present bias
availability heuristic
being swayed by a good story
confirmation bias
bias blind spot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

being swayed by a good story

A

accepting something because it feels natural/”makes sense”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

availability heuristic

A

-incorrectly estimating the frequency of an event by relying on what comes to mind easiest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

example of availability heuristic

A

“im scared of planes because they crash often”
-do they crash often or are plane crashes just reported more frequently than successful plane travel?
-example of overestimation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

present/present bias

A

incorrectly estimating the relationship between event and outcome. we rely on what’s present and FAIL TO CONSIDER WHAT’S ABSENT

19
Q

confirmation bias

A

tendency to look only at info that agrees with our beliefs

20
Q

bias blind spot

A

denying/being unaware of biases in oneself

21
Q

why is there typically a group of researchers/hiring committee/etc. rather than just 1 person in charge?

A

bias blind spot.

22
Q

what 2 things are people with a bias blind spot less likely to do?

A

accept advice from others & learn from training that would help them make better decisions

23
Q

primary sources

A

report DIRECTLY from the results of an empirical study/ies

24
Q

secondary sources

A

summarize past findings or produce a new theory

25
components of a journal article IN ORDER
1. abstract 2. introduction 3. methods 4. results 5. discussion 6. references
26
3 parts of a research introduction
-background info/motivation for study -review of past literature -study's purpose and hypotheses
27
abstract
concise summary of the article
28
research paper discussion
interpretation of the results WITH RESPECT TO THE HYPOTHESES
29
in articles with multiple studies, each study can have its own what?
intro, methods, results and discussion
30
disinformation
a news story, photo, video, etc. deliberately created to be false or misleading
31
what may stay the same in one study but could vary in another?
a constant
32
how many levels does a variable have?
at least 2
33
measured vs manipulated variables
measured: levels are observed/recorded manipulated: controlled by researchers
34
in what type of study are variables manipulated?
causal/experiments.
35
2 reasons why some variables can only be measured and not manipulated
1. naturally occurring attributes (age, gender, etc.) 2. ethics
36
most of this type of variable can be both measured and manipulated
physiological
37
4 types of "roles" of variables
subject variables (self-esteem) context variables (privacy) stimulus variables (something presented that provokes a response) response variables (test performance)
38
2 data types of variables
quantitative: levels differ in amount qualitative: levels differ in quality/type
39
where do categorical, ordinal and nominal variables belong to?
categorical and nominal - qualitative ordinal - quantitative
40
main difference between conceptual definition and operational definition of a variable
the operational definition defines the method that a variable is measured/manipulated; a conceptual definition is just an abstract/theoretical statement about a variable. ex: hunger: number of hours of food deprivation (operational) hunger: desire for food (conceptual)
41
3 reasons why operational definition are important
-replication -forces researchers to clarify ideas -objectivity and public verification
42
relation of variables in experimental studies vs non-experimental studies
experimental: IV is manipulated, DV is measured non-experimental: predictor variable is assumed IV, criterion variable is assumed DV
43
difference in IV in experimental vs non-experimental studies
experimental: manipulated non-experimental: measured