Chapter 13 Quasi-Experiments Flashcards

1
Q

how are quasi-experiments similar to experiments?

A

has IVs and DVs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

main difference between quasi experiments vs experiments

A

quasi experiments don’t have full experimental control and don’t use random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

when are quasi experiments typically used?

A

in situations where random assignment is unethical (real world situations that can’t be manipulated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does the term “nonequivalent” refer to in quasi designs?

A

no use of random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

types of quasi designs

A

nonequivalent control group posttest only
nonequivalent control group pretest/posttest
nonequivalent control group interrupted time series

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2 main characteristics of a nonequivalent control group design

A
  1. no use of random assignment; instead participants were either all born with something, exposed to something naturally occurring, etc.
  2. at least 1 treatment group and 1 comparison group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what comparisons do we want to make in nonequiv posttest only designs?

A

between-subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

which threat is heavy in nonequiv posttest only design?

A

selection threats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

nonequivalent pre/post design controls most threats to internal validity except for?

A

selection effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when is the DV measured in interrupted time-series design?

A

repeatedly (before, during (could be several times) and after)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3 pros to interrupted times series design

A

-results are interpretable
-cam see normal fluctuation and trends
-can see how long lasting an effect is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why is an interrupted time series design better than a 1 group pre/post design?

A

there’s more data points which makes it easier to interpret

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how many groups does an interrupted time-series design have?

A

2 or more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

does the timing of the interruption differ b/w groups in interrupted-time series designs?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

which effects are found in quasi-experiments

A

selection effects; we don’t know if the change in DV is due to the IV or a shared participant characteristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

solutions to eliminating selection fx in quasi experiments

A
  1. create matched groups
  2. waitlist: upgrade the quasi to a true experiment
17
Q

threats found in quasi experiments

A

design confounds
maturation threat
history threats
regression to the mean
attrition
testing and instrumentation threats
observer bias
demand characteristics
placebo fx

18
Q

maturation threats are typical in which designs

A

pretest-posttest

19
Q

which threats can be addressed by adding a comparison group in quasi experiments

A

maturation
history
testing

20
Q

how to control for observer bias in quasi experiments

A

use a masked or double blind design

21
Q

pros of carefully designed quasi experiments

A

-provides real-world data (not simulated experiments)
-typically high external validity
-allows us to study issues that cannot be ethically studied in experiments
-high construct validity of the IV

22
Q

similarities b/w quasi and correlational designs

A

-no random assignment
-both prone to internal validity threats

23
Q

key differences b/w quasi and correlational designs

A

-in quasi: we actively seek out naturally occurring comparison groups
-quasi is more meaningful/closer to establishing causation

24
Q

small N vs large N designs

A

small N: limited number of participants, high amount of data for each participant
large N: high number of participants, their data gets averaged out and we learn less about each person typically

25
Q

adv and disadv for small N designs

A

adv: studies special cases, can have some experimental control if compared to matched control groups
disadv: external validity, internal validity sometimes

26
Q

small N designs are commonly used in which field of psychology and why?

A

therapy/behavior analysis, because it allows for modifying the behaviors of certain individuals to produce a desired result

27
Q

3 small N designs

A

stable-baseline
multiple-baseline
reversal

28
Q

stable-baseline design

A

an extended observation of baseline before intervention is introduced

29
Q

when do we know a stable-baseline design was effective

A

if the target behavior changes only after intervention

30
Q

what threats can stable-baseline designs rule out

A

maturation
regression to the mean

31
Q

multiple baseline design

A

staggers interventions across times, settings, or situations

32
Q

reversal designs

A

target behavior improves during treatment but reverses to baseline when treatment is removed

33
Q

when are reversal designs used

A

when treatment does not have a long term effect

34
Q

discuss 4 big validities for small N designs

A

internal: can be high if the study was carefully designed
external: can be problematic depending on the goals of the study
construct: can also be high if definitions and observations are precise
statistical: not always relevant to small N studies bc we’re looking at a limited number of participants