Chapter 14 - Replication and Transparency Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define direct replication

A

where the researcher repeats the original study as closely as possible to see whether the original effect shows up in the newly collected data
- can help to confirm results
- can get you to find more confounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define conceptual replication

A

researchers examine the same research question (same conceptual variables) but use different procedures for operationalizing the variables
- wanting to rule out method effect
- can be seen in the same article

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define replication-plus-extension

A

where the researcher replicates thier original study but add variables or conditions that test additional question
- can add mediator, moderator, etc.
- commonly seen in articles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why might a study not be replicated?

A
  • contextually sensitive effect (context, settings)
  • number of replication attempts (may not find the results just by chance)
  • problems with the original study (ex. small sample size)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define file drawer problem

A

problem for meta analysis which might overestimate the support for a theory because studies finding null effects are less likely to be published than studies finding significant results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define underreporting null effects

A

researcher misleads about strength of evidence by not reporting conditions that did not support the hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define p-hacking

A

questionable data analysis techniques which can lead to nonreplicable results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define HARKing

A

questionable research practise in which researchers create an after the fact hypothesis about an unexpected research results, like they predicted it all along

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define meta-analysis

A

quantitative summary of a particular effect
- collecting all studies that estimated a given effect then calcauted the average effect size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly