Chapter 14 - Replication and Transparency Flashcards
define direct replication
where the researcher repeats the original study as closely as possible to see whether the original effect shows up in the newly collected data
- can help to confirm results
- can get you to find more confounds
define conceptual replication
researchers examine the same research question (same conceptual variables) but use different procedures for operationalizing the variables
- wanting to rule out method effect
- can be seen in the same article
define replication-plus-extension
where the researcher replicates thier original study but add variables or conditions that test additional question
- can add mediator, moderator, etc.
- commonly seen in articles
why might a study not be replicated?
- contextually sensitive effect (context, settings)
- number of replication attempts (may not find the results just by chance)
- problems with the original study (ex. small sample size)
define file drawer problem
problem for meta analysis which might overestimate the support for a theory because studies finding null effects are less likely to be published than studies finding significant results
define underreporting null effects
researcher misleads about strength of evidence by not reporting conditions that did not support the hypothesis
define p-hacking
questionable data analysis techniques which can lead to nonreplicable results
define HARKing
questionable research practise in which researchers create an after the fact hypothesis about an unexpected research results, like they predicted it all along
define meta-analysis
quantitative summary of a particular effect
- collecting all studies that estimated a given effect then calcauted the average effect size