Chapter 12 Flashcards
what is thinking?
- going beyond info given
- problem soling
- decision making
- inductive/deductive reasoning
what is deductive reasoning
thinking
general–> specific
- draw logical conclusions based on info supplied to you
what is inductive reasoning
specific –> general
- occurs when we observe specific instances and draw general conclusion
2 components of inductive reasonng
1) specific induction
2) general induction
what is specific induction
- known instances to other specific unknown instances
- used to generate testable predictions
- inferences may be correct or incorrect
when is specific induction useful?
- instances seem similar
- instances are typical
- category is homogeneous
specific induction and hockey example
on TV see very first hockey game, see a lot of violence
- know next time watch there will be violence
- drawing inference, conclusion and predicting game will have a lot of violence
what is general induction
- known instances to ALL members of the category
- induce general rule
inducing general rule in general induction problems
- when infer rules about how things work or may not work in the world
- fail to look for what violates what we assume, need to look for info that contradicts what you believe is true
2 problems of deductive reasoning
syllogisms
conditional reasoning
what is deductive reasoning?
- general to specific
what are syllogisms?
- accept premises as true
(2 statements we must assume to be true, plus conclusion) - refer to quantities (use: “all, none, some”)
what matters in a syllogisms?
- structure
veracity does not matter
example of a syllogism (carlos, bird, fly)
all birds can fly
carlos is a bird
therefore carlos can fly
- made judgements about conclusion
3 ways to judge conclusion using syllogism
valid
invalid
indeterminate
syllogism- when do you use type 1 processing
- when do you use type 2 processing
type 1: automatically say its valid
type 2: re-examine the syllogism, and realize that the strict rules of deductive reasoning require you to answer ‘conclusion is indeterminate’
2 types of syllogism
universal
specific
what is a universal syllogism
includes “all”
ex: all birds can fly
what is a specific syllogism
“some” birds can fly
syllogisms can be 2 things
affirmative and negative
ex: neg- no birds can fly, carlos is a bird, therefore carlos cannot fly (valid)
ex: neg- some birds cannot fly, carlos is a burd, therefore carlos cannot fly (indeterminate)
what is conditional reasoning?
- describes relationship between conditions
- if-then statements
- make an assertion
judge conditional reasoning to be either
valid or invalid
what do you use to represent conditional reasoning
propositional calculus
2 parts to if- then statement
antecedent (P)- “if”
consequent (Q) – “then”
how to use propositional calculus
P–> Q
P
Therefore, Q
4 ways to either affirm/deny the P and Q
- affirm the antecedent (valid)
- deny the antecedent (invalid)
- affirm the consequent (invalid)
- deny the consequent (valid)
this is an apple, therefore this is a fruit
valid
affirm the antecedent
this is not a fruit, therefore this is not an apple
valid
- deny the consequent
this is a fruit, therefore this is an apple
invalid
- affirm the consequent
its saying (if p then q, q therefore p)–> WRONG
this is not an apple, therefore this is not a fruit
invalid
deny the antecedent
saying: if p then q, not p therefore not q
ex: today is monday, therefore I have my cognitive class
valid
affirming the antecedent
I do not have my cognitive class, therefore today is not monday
valid
deny the consequent
I have my cognitive class, therefore today is monday
invalid
affirming the consequent
it could be wednesday
today is not monday, therefore I do not have my cognitive class
invalid
denying the antecedent
what is the saying to solve conditional reasoning questions
affirm the (P)rince
Deny the (Q)ueen
- everything else is wrong
4 factors that influence reasoning
1) negative information
2) belief bias effect
3) illicit conversions
4) concreteness
how does negative info influence reasoning?
- determining if valid or invalid
ex: if today is not friday (P), then staff cannot dress casually (Q)
– the staff cannot fress casually today, therefore today is not friday = affirming the Q (invalid)
– the staff can dress casually, then today is friday = affirming P
(valid)
how does the belief bias influence reasoning?
- tend to validate statements we believe (top down processing gets in way)
- regardless of logic
people with belief bias more likely to have…
low scores on test of flexible thinking
flexible thinkers
- more likely to solve reasoning problems correctly without being distracted by belief-bias effect. Block everyday knowledge
- Tend to carefully inspect reasoning problem, trying to determine whether the logic is faulty
how do illicit conversions influence reasoning?
- assume that P–>Q = Q–>P
(cant be reversed) - confirmation bias (look at things that are true)
what is the test used to test confirmation bias
standard wason selection test
- if card has vowel on one side (P), then it has even number on other side (Q)
- rule: decide which cards need to be flipped
cards E J 6 7
the standard wason selection test with cards - which ones to flip
E J 6 7
- flip E (P) and 7 (~Q)
- wanted to flop 6 to confirm what you believed= dont need to
- flip E to affirm the antecedent
- flip 7 to deny the consequent (check to see if it does not have even # on other side)
how does concreteness influence reasoning?
- better at solving concrete problems (rather than abstract)
example for concreteness
rule: if patron is to drink legally (P), then he or she must be 19 years or older (Q)
task: which cards need to be flipped
Beer, Pop, 28, 16
- flip beer (P) - to affirm the antecedent
- flip 16 (~Q) to deny the consequent
what is decision making
- assess info and choose among 2 types of cognitive processes