Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Political Studies 256 > Chapter 1 - The Scientific Approach to Politics > Flashcards

Chapter 1 - The Scientific Approach to Politics Flashcards

1
Q

4 Examples of the Ubiquity of Social Science Research

A
  1. Public Opinion Data
  2. Behavioural Data
  3. Official Statistics
  4. Economic Data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social Science Influences these 3 Things

A
  1. Political Debates
  2. Popular Beliefs
  3. Policy (sometimes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 Challenges for Consumers of Social Science Research

A
  1. Assessing the quality of studies
  2. Assessing the relevance of studies
  3. Ensuring objectivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Definition of Evidence and the 2 Types

A

Information that is used to provide a basis for a point of view

  1. Facts
  2. Observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2 Ways to Determine Values of Evidence

A
  1. Quality (validity, reliability)

2. The body of evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Argument Definition

A

Series of logical statements that lead to a conclusion, with reasons offered to support the conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Research Nihilism

A

That extreme end of critically evaluating research. There is no perfect research, but this belief posits that no research can have meaning because of inherent human bias and possible design flaws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The 4 Parts of the Evidence Quality Continuum

A

Misleading Evidence
No or limited evidence
Best available evidence
Strong evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How to Distinguish and Approach Evidence

A

We examine how to distinguish between evidence that, despite its relatively minor limitations, merits guiding our practice versus more seriously flawed evidence that should be viewed more cautiously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Four Portions of POLS 256 and what we will look at

A
  1. Scientific Method
    - Positivism and its critics
    - theory
  2. Design Issues
    - Ethics
    - Concepts and measures
    - Sampling
    - Comparative case study
  3. Quantitative Research Designs
    - Surveys and official statistics
    - Experiments
    - Quantitative analysis
  4. Qualitative Research Designs
    - Textual analysis
    - Interviews, focus groups, observation
    - Qualitative analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

5 Steps to Evidence-Based Practice and Policy

A
  1. Formulate Question
  2. Search for best evidence available
  3. Critically appraise evidence
  4. Select intervention based on appraisal of evidence, expertise, and context
  5. Monitor Progress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Type-of-Evidence Continuum (Three types)

A
  1. Opinion
  2. Assertion (some that is held to be true but that cannot or has not yet been demonstrated to be true)
  3. Fact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is social science science?

A

Because social scientists still use the same steps / scientific method and have similar philosophical assumptions about the world, reality, and causal relationships
The only difference is the objects of research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Normative v Empirical Analysis

A

Empirical is descriptive, explanatory, observation

Normative is prescriptive, ideals, value judgements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

4 Underlying Assumptions of Positivism

A
  1. Causality / Determinism
  2. Measurable / Empiricism
  3. Objectivity
  4. Replication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Causality / Determinism Explained

A

Causal relationships exist, are the reason for the the state of the world.
Events are determined by previously existing causes.

17
Q

Measurable / Empiricism

A

Things in the world are measurable through human perception / observation. Through this we are capable of understanding the causes of effects.

18
Q

Objectivity

A

Despite being biased subjects, if we used certain methods we can objectively observe the single reality.

19
Q

Replication

A
  1. Ideas and theories are continuously tested to ensure their place in reality. No amount of replication with the same result can lead to certainty, but one replication that disputes a claim ruins it forever.
  2. We can determine universal truths about the objective world by having many subjects use the scientific method to observe things.
20
Q

4 Criticisms of Empirical Analysis / Evidence

A
  1. Evidence can change over time
  2. Evidence has its limits - humanistic element
  3. Evidence is filtered through power (postmodernism)
  4. Measurements - always imperfect, always things that are immeasurable
21
Q

5 Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy

A
  1. Evidence searching, time consumption
  2. Studies may not exist
  3. Studies may point in different directions
  4. Studies may have poor design
  5. Intervention may not fit context
22
Q

3 Challenges to Objectivity

A

Confirmation Bias
Disconfirmation Bias
Motivated Reasoning
- When you find evidence that should threaten your belief but you rationalize and find a way to make it fit)

23
Q

Intersubjectivity

A

Empirical facts must be independently observed and agreed upon by many people.
(Two people, acting independently, perceive the same thing)

24
Q

9 Step of the Scientific Method

A
  1. Identify the problem
  2. Hypothesize the cause of the problem
  3. Provide clear definitions of the concepts
  4. Operationalize the concepts
  5. Gather empirical data
  6. Test the hypothesis
  7. Reflect back on the theory
  8. Publicize the results
  9. Replicate the results
25
Q

Empirical Analysis

A

Descriptive in nature; the goal is to describe and to explain the political as it is rather than as it should be.

26
Q

Epistemology

A

An approach to knowledge

27
Q

Independent Variable

A

The observable characteristics of phenomena that can take on more than one value; specific and concrete measurements of a concept

28
Q

Epistemology

A

An approach to knowledge

29
Q

Confounding

A

The presence of some unobserved difference between groups that is considered correlated both with the outcome and the independent variable of interest, thereby making causal inference impossible.

30
Q

Treatments

A

The intervention of interest; also known as stimulus.

31
Q

Postmodernism

A

Reality is socially constructed and the observer cannot be separated from what they purport to see.

32
Q

Variance

A

In the context of the scientific method, there must be enough variance when the independent variable is removed to be measurable by human perception.

33
Q

Interpretivism (Aka anti-positivism)

A

The view that reality does not exist independent of individuals and that all knowledge is socially constructed; no objective reality

34
Q

Operationalizatoin

A

Moving from the general or conceptual level to the specific or concrete. Moving from concepts to variables.
In quantitative research, it would be assigning an abstract concept with a numerical value.

35
Q

Postmodernism

A

A philosophical position that states that it is impossible to identify objective knowledge because all knowledge is embedded within the power, class, gender, and racial structure of society.

36
Q

Correlation

A

The measurement or observation of a common variation among multiple concepts or measures; can exist without a causal relation.

37
Q

Falsifiable

A

It must be possible, through both the logic of analysis and the design of research, to demonstrate the absence of a causal relationship between the concepts being examined.

38
Q

Null Hypothesis

A

The opposite of the hypothesis - that there is no causal relationship between two variables. This must be tested in addition to the normal hypothesis.

39
Q

Measurement Validity

A

The extent to which the measurement of a particular concept matches its operational definition.

Political Studies 256 (17 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions