Ch 8: Assessment: Self Report and Projective Measures Flashcards
What are personality traits?
- consistencies in behaviour, emotions, and attitudes across situations and time, shaped by genetics and life experiences
- ie the more an individual possessed a certain trait, the more likely they would behave consistent with that trait in any situation or environment
What is the person-situation debate?
- whether measures of personality can accurately predict behaviour and if personality is stable or if stability is illusory
What did Mischel’s literature review find about the person-situation debate?
- variations across situations were more important than personality measures in accounting for behavioural variability
- personality and behaviour overlap rarely
How is the person-situation debate viewed today?
- no longer considered a debate (like nature vs. nurture)
- both situational influences and personality traits are important in predicting behaviour
What is cross-situational variability important for?
- cross-situational variability in people’s actions is a source of important information
What did the person-situation debate spark?
- psychologists began developing and increasingly using situation or disorder-specific checklists and rating scales which now complement personality measures in assessments
What do validity scales detect?
- many measures include validity scales that detect:
- faking good
- malingering
- inconsistent response style
How do we develop culturally appropriate measures?
- assume measures are culturally biased unless data suggests otherwise
- is the content applicable across different groups?
- are construct related in similar ways across different groups?
- do the cut-off scores developed with one group apply to other groups?
- is the factor structure the same across groups? (one group may have more physical components of anxiety)
What is the ideal way to use culturally appropriate assessment?
- use measures that have been validated for the specific group
- consult published norms in interpreting findings
- use multiple assessment methods to reduce bias
How do we complete culturally appropriate assessment when there are no measures validated for use with a group?
- avoid using scores
- use tests to generate hypotheses only
- explicitly acknowledge questionable validity of test with this group
What must always be taken into account when interpreting test data?
- take into account the client’s life circumstances when interpreting test data and integrating hypotheses with other clinical information
What are the steps to translate a measure?
- translate
- back-translate
- compare and adjust as required
- pilot test and adjust
- test reliability in larger sample and adjust
- re-standardize scores with norms from 2nd language group
- study construct validity
What are the aspects of clinical utility?
- do clinicians find it useful?
- is there replicated evidence of reliability and validity?
- does it make a difference?
Why were self-report personality measures created?
- based on idea that we are good sources of information about ourselves
What is the downfall of self-report personality measures?
- little scientific evidence of personality measures having meaningful impact on outcome of psychological services
- have been used to inform treatment-planning decisions but are not effective for this