Ch 8 Flashcards
◦Research methods have been developed to appraise, describe, and compare the relative value of health services. These are called…
cost-effectiveness analyses or economic evaluations
Economic evaluations are distinct from clinical evaluations in that they..
focus on costs and outcomes rather than the efficacy or effectiveness of a specific intervention.
Descriptive profile of the costs and outcomes of one or more interventions.
Cost-consequences
Identifies the least costly alternative for services that result in equivalent outcomes.
Cost-minimization
Describes and compares the relative costs and outcomes of two or more interventions that result in the same type of outcome.
Cost-effectiveness
Describes and compares the relative costs and outcomes of two or more interventions in which the outcomes of interest include health status and the value of the status to the individual.
Cost-utility
Describes and compares the relative costs and outcomes of two or more interventions in which both the costs and outcome can be measured in monetary values.
Cost-benefit
Community based geriatric case management program for frail elderly.
Is an example of
Cost-consequence
Use of hip protectors in the prevention of hip fractures in frail institutionalized elderly.
Is an example of…
Cost-Minimization
Water-based exercise therapy versus usual care for lower limb osteoarthritis.
Home exercise program or no intervention for knee pain.
Is an example of…
Cost-Effectiveness
Early discharge of elderly persons.
Stroke unit, stroke team, or domiciliary stroke care.
Is an example of…
Cost-Utility
Needle exchange program to prevent HIV transmission.
Providing versus not offering a fall prevention program.
Is an example of…
Cost-benefit
Conducting Economic Evaluations
Research question defines the purpose and scope of assessment.
◦Descriptive analysis or comparative assessment.
◦Important to consider the perspective of the analysis (from society, payers, providers, and/or consumers).
◦Evaluators of economic analyses should make judgments regarding the internal and external validity of their assessments including source of bias, contamination, and noncompliance.
◦When critically analyzing economic analyses, it is important to look at both internal and external factors
Questions to ask with internal validity
Did the research question clearly/accurately define compared options? Was perspective of the analysis defined?
–Were the important costs and outcomes identified and properly measured and valued?
–How rigorous was the methodology used to establish costs and the effectiveness of service alternatives?
–Were differences between outcomes analyzed and compared?
Questions to ask with external validity
Are the outcomes worth the costs?
–Could my clients expect similar health outcomes?
–Could I expect similar costs?