Ch. 2 - Interviewing Flashcards
RELATIONSHIP DIMENSIONS:
Similarity
- a few similarities do not equal relational peers.
- relationships are fostered when both parties share cultural norms and values, education, experiences, personal traits, beliefs and expectations.
- you may find it easier to interact with people of the same gender or race, who share similar political views, have the same major, and love similar music.
- awareness of such similarities able interview parties to understand one another and establish a common ground - literally to expand the overlap of the circles until perceived similarities overcome perceived dissimilarities.
- be cautious because surface similarities such as age, dress and ethnicity may be all that you have in common.
- “similarity is based not on whether people actually are similar but on the perceived (though not necessarily real) recognition or discovery of a similar trait.” - Judith Martin
RELATIONSHIP DIMENSIONS:
Inclusion
- wanting to take part leads to collaboration
- relationships are enhanced when both parties want to take part actively as speakers and listeners, questioners and respondents.
- the more you are involved and share, the more satisfied you will be with the relationship and look forward to future interactions.
- degree or satisfaction may be apparent in each party’s words, gestures, face, eyes and actions.
- effective relationships develop when interviewer and interviewee become interdependent, when “each become aware that what” they do and not do “will have an impact on the other” and each begins to act with the other person in mind.
- their behaviors are joint actions now, not individual actions.
RELATIONSHIP DIMENSIONS:
Affection
- we interact more freely with person’s we like.
- interview relationships are cultivated when parties like and respect one another and there is a marked degree of warmth or friendship.
- occurs when their is a “we” instead of a “me-you” feeling and you communication in a way the other party finds pleasant, productive and fair.
- it is important that both parties know whether feelings toward one another in an interview are likely to be positive, ambivalent, or negative. (signals for hostility are inconsistent)
RELATIONSHIP DIMENSIONS:
Affection (continued)
- you may come to an interview with an ambivalent or hostile attitude toward the other party, perhaps due to relational history or what James Honeycutt calls relational memory.
- “even though relationships are in constant motion, relationship memory structures provide a perceptual anchor so that individuals can determine where they are in the relationship.”
- relational memory may aid parties in dealing with what researchers call dialectical tensions that result from conflict between important but opposing needs or desires or between opposing or contrasting voices, each expressing a different or contradictory impulse.
- dialectical tensions are not necessarily bad because researchers believe they are a normal part of any close, interdependent relationships and they become problematic only when people fail to manage them properly.
RELATIONSHIP DIMENSIONS:
Control
- because each party participates in a continuous process, each is responsible for its success or failure.
- john stewart introduced the concept of “nexting” that he labels, “the most important communication skills” because whenever you face a communication challenge or problem, the most useful question you can ask yourself is “what can I help to happen next”
- he claims that since no one person determines all the outcomes of a communication event, you can help determine some outcomes, even if you feel almost powerless. since no one person is 1000% to blame or at fault, and all parties share responsibility, our next contribute can affect what’s happening.
RELATIONSHIP DIMENSIONS:
Control (continued)
- who controls what and when poses problems in interviews because interviews frequently involve organizational hierarchies or chains of command: president over vice president, professor over student, supervisor over intern.
- this upward and downward communication may encumber each party, perhaps in different ways.
- Edward Hall: one’s status in a social system also affects what must be attended. people at the top pay attention to different things from those in the the middle or the bottom of the system.
- what you look for a value as a student may be quite different from what a professor looks for and values.
- hierarchy may hinder the flow in information and self-disclosure.
RELATIONSHIP DIMENSIONS:
Trust
- trust is essential in every interview
- trust is the single most important element of a good working relationship.
- trust is essential because potential outcomes affect each party directly - your income, your career, your purchase, your profits, your health, your understanding.
- relationships are cultivated when parties trust one another to be honest, sincere, reliable, truthful, fair, even-tempered, and of high ethical standards - in other words, safe.
- when we trust others, we expect positive outcomes from interactions with them; when we have anxiety about interacting with others, we fear negative outcomes from our interactions with them.
RELATIONSHIP DIMENSIONS:
Trust (continued)
- creating trust is a delicate process and may take months or years to develop with another party, but i can be destroyed in an instant if you feel betrayed by a colleague, coworker, friend, etc.
- trust provides a context in which interaction can be more honest, spontaneous, direct and open.
- disclosure is critical to the success of interviews and uninhibited disclosure requires trust.
- unpredictable persons and outcomes lead to cautious questions and responses and sharing of information and attitudes - risk is too high.
- a generation ago 2/3s said they trust other persons - not 2/3s say they don’t trust others.
- the result is that their is a greater effort to protect ourselves when communication with other people.
Global Relationships
- in intercultural conflict situations, when we are experiencing high anxieties with unfamiliar behavior (for ex., accents, gestures, facial expressions), we may automatically withhold trust.
- some anxiety already exists in the early stages of relationships.
- this anxiety stems from fears about possible negative consequences of our actions. we may be afraid that we will look stupid or will offend someone because we’re unfamiliar with that person’s language or culture.
Global Relationships (continued)
- in the US we tend to have many friendly, informal relationships and tend to place importance on how a person looks, particularly early on in the relationship.
- we created and discard friendships frequently, while australians make deeper and longer-lasting commitments.
- Arabs also develop friendships quickly, but they believe friends should do favors for one another and have a duty to one another.
- Chinese develop long-term relationships that tend to be strong, and, like the arabs, see friendships as involving obligations.
- relationships develop differently in different cultures.
Gender in Relationships
- gender differences have evolved but have not disappeared.
- “men are from north Dakota and women are from south Dakota” - Kathryn Dindia
- substantial similarity - not differences - in the values both sexes place on supportive communication skills, such as comforting and listening
- regardless of similarities, gender differences of interview parties may be critical in establishing and refining relationships.
Gender in Relationships
continued
- men’s talk tends to be directive and gaol oriented with statements that tend to press compliance, agreement or belief.
- women’s talk may be more polite and expressive, containing less intense words, qualifiers (perhaps), and disclaimers (maybe I’m wrong, but..)
- women use communication as a primary way of establishing relationships, while men communication to exert control, preserve independence, and enhance status.
- women give more praise and compliments and are reluctant to criticize directly in the workplace while men remain silent when a coworker is doing something well and take criticism straight.
- women report greater satisfaction with their interactions than do men.
- women are more likely to betray and be betrayed by other women.
- men are more likely to be betrayed by other men with whom they are competing with
Interchanging Roles During Interviews:
- a single party cannot make an interview a success, but it can ensure it’s failure.
- while one party may control an interview, both speak and listen from time to time, ask and answer q’s, and take on the roles of interviewer and interviewee.
- neither party can sit back and expect the other to make the interview a success single-handedly.
- human communicators are always receiving and sending simultaneously. as a result, each communicator has the opportunity to change how things are going at any time in the process.
- the degree in which roles are exchanged and shared and control is shared is often affected by the status or expertise of the parties, who initiated the interview, type of interview, situation, atmosphere of the interaction - supportive, defensive, friendly or hostile.
- these factors determine which two fundamental interview approaches an interviewer selects - directive or nondirective.
Directive Approach
- a directive approach allows the interviewer to maintain control.
- the interviewer establishes the purpose of the interview and attempts to control the pacing, climate and formality of the interview.
- questions are likely to be closed with brief, direct answers.
- although an aggressive interviewee may assume some control as the interview progresses, the interviewer intends to control the interview.
- typical directive interviews are information giving, surveys and opinion polls, employee recruiting, and persuasive interviews such as a sales.
- it’s easy to learn, takes less time, enables you to maintain control, and is easy to replicate.
Nondirective Approach
- the interviewee has significant control over subject matter, length of answers, interview climate, and formality.
- q’s are likely to be open-ended and neutral to give the interviewee maximum opportunity and freedom to respond.
- typically nondirective interviews are journalistic, oral history, investigations, counseling, and performance review.
- this approach allows for greater flexibility and adaptability, encourages probing questions, and invites the interviewee to volunteer information.
- enables the interviewee to share control.
Combination of Approaches
- be flexible and adaptable when selecting approaches
- the roles we play should guide but not dictate approaches
- you can select a combination of the two approaches.
- you may choose the nondirective approach at first to relax the interviewee and then switch to a directive approach when giving information about the organization and position, and return to the nondirective approach when answering the applicant’s questions.
- often the choice of interview approach is governed by societal and organizational rules and expectations.
- adherence to societal roles and expectations may lead to an ineffective interview.
PERCEPTIONS OF INTERVIEWER AND INTERVIEWEE:
- each party comes to an interview with perceptions of self and of the other party.
- these perceptions may change positively or negatively as the interview progresses.
- our relationships are largely due to these perceptions and determine how we communication.
- four perceptions drive our interactions
- self-concept
- self-identity
- self-esteem
- self-fulfilling prophecy
PERCEPTIONS OF INTERVIEWER AND INTERVIEWEE:
Perceptions of Self (self-concept)
- our self-perception - self concept - emerges from our experiences, activities, attitudes, accomplishments and failures, interactions, and the superior and subordinate roles we play.
- it is a demanding and assertive personal view of who we are and how we want to be seen and taken, of the kind of persons we feel ourselves to be or the kind of person we think we out to be.
- our self-concept is a mutual creation of interpretations - how we interpret and think others interpret who we have been, are and will be
- it’s through these interpretations that we create our self-identity.
PERCEPTIONS OF INTERVIEWER AND INTERVIEWEE:
Perceptions of Self (self-identity)
- our self-concept is a mutual creation of interpretations - how we interpret and think others interpret who we have been, are, and will be
- it’s through these interpretations that we create our self-identity.
- we come to each encounter with an identifiable “self” built through past interactions, and as we talk, we adapt ourself to fit the topics we are discussing and the people we are talking with, and we are changed by what happens to us as we communicate.
- our self-concept and self-identity are affected by the expectations of our family, society, professions, and organizations place upon us.
- we may experience different self-concepts as we move from one situation or role to another.
PERCEPTIONS OF INTERVIEWER AND INTERVIEWEE:
Perceptions of Self (self-esteem)
- self-esteem is how we perceive our self-worth.
- it’s a critical element of self-concept and self-identity
- we exert a great deal of mental and communicative energy attempting to gain and maintain recognition and approval from family members, friends, peers, and others because we have a “persistent and compelling” need to give an accounting of ourselves
- if we feel respected and taken seriously - have high self-esteem - we may be more perceptive, confident, and likely to express attitudes and ideas that are unpopular.
- low self-esteem can lead to us not correctly interpreting the behavior and communication of others.
- we may succeed or fail because we convince ourself that we will - the self-fulfilling prophecy that influence messages sent and received, risks taken, confident and self-disclosure.
- self-esteem is closely related to self-worth.
PERCEPTIONS OF INTERVIEWER AND INTERVIEWEE:
Perceptions of Self (self-fulfilling prophecy)
- if we feel respected and taken seriously - have high self-esteem - we may be more perceptive, confident, and likely to express attitudes and ideas that are unpopular.
- low self-esteem can lead to us not correctly interpreting the behavior and communication of others.
- we may succeed or fail because we convince ourself that we will - the self-fulfilling prophecy that influence messages sent and received, risks taken, confident and self-disclosure.
PERCEPTIONS OF INTERVIEWER AND INTERVIEWEE:
Cultural and Gender Differences
- self-concept, self-identity and self-esteem are central in American and Western cultures because they emphasize the individual.
- not central in Eastern cultures or South American countries.
- Japanese, Chinese and Indians are collectivist cultures, not individualists - they are more concerned with the image, esteem and achievement of the group
- failure to appreciate cultural differences has led to many communication problems for American interviewers and interviewees.
- many citizens of the global village are less concerned with self than with the group.
- China would consider focusing on the individual as egotistical, self-advancing, and disrespectful.
PERCEPTIONS OF INTERVIEWER AND INTERVIEWEE:
Cultural and Gender Differences
- gender matters in self-concepts because gender roles are socially constructed ideas about how women and men should think and behave.
- men are expected to be more assertive and in charge, and self-sufficient while women are taught to be feminine, submissive, and to show empathy and emotional expressiveness.
- not all men and women act this way but we can’t ignore the role of society on gender and self-concept and it’s potential impact on an interview.
PERCEPTIONS OF INTERVIEWER AND INTERVIEWEE:
Perceptions of the Other Party
- perceptions are a two-way process
- allow interactions to alter or reinforce perceptions
- how you perceive the other affects how you approach an interview and how you react during it.
- previous encounters with a party may lead you to look forward to or dread an interview.
- your perceptions may be influence by the other’s age, gender, race, ethnic group, size and physical attractiveness - particularly if the person differs significantly from you.
- a positive endorsement of a third party may influence how you perceive a person.
- if you are flexible and adaptable, these perceptions may change as an interview progresses by how the interview begins, the other party’s manner, dress, appearance, listening and feedback, verbal and nonverbal interactions, questions and answers, etc.
- warmth, understanding, and cooperation on the part of both parties can enhance perceptions of each.
COMMUNICATION INTERACTIONS
- the three communication levels differ in relational distance, self-disclosure, risk encountered, perceived meaning, and amount and type of context exchanged.
- level 1
- level 2
- level 3
COMMUNICATION INTERACTIONS:
Level 1
- interactions on this level avoid judgements, attitudes, and feelings
- interactions are safe and superficial
- relatively safe, nonthreatening interactions about such topics as hometowns, professions, sporting events, college courses, families, etc.
- they generate safe, socially acceptable, comfortable and ambiguous answers such as “pretty good” “not bad” “can’t complain” that do not reveal judgments, attitudes, or feelings.
- each level is a metaphorical door, with the door being slightly open in level 1 interactions.
- general ideas, surface feelings, and simple information pass through, but either party may close the door quicly and safely if necessary
Level 1 Interaction
continued
- the thickness of the arrow in the figure means that level 1 communication exchanges are most common in interviews, and the length of the arrow symbolizes the relational distance
- level 1 interactions dominate interviews in which there is no relational history, trust, the issue is controversial, or the role relationship is between high-status and low-status parties.
COMMUNICATION INTERACTIONS:
Level 2
- this level requires trust and risk-taking
- this level deals with personal or controversial topics and probe into beliefs, attitudes, values and positions.
- responses tend to be half-safe, half-revealing, as parties seek to cooperate without revealing too much.
- the metaphorical door is half open (the optimist view) or half closed ( the pessimist’s view) - as more specific and revealing ideas, feelings and information pass through
- through willing to take more risk, parties retain the option to close the door quickly if needed.
- thickness of the arrow signifies that level 2 interactions are less common than level 1, and the length of the arrows shows hat a close relationship between parties is necessary to move from superficial to more revealing exchanges (level 1 to level 2)
COMMUNICATION INTERACTIONS:
Level 3
- this involves full disclosure
- deal with more personal and controversial topics/levels of inquiry
- Respondents fully disclose their feelings, beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions
- little is withheld and sometimes questioners get more than they bargained for.
- the metaphorical door is fully and wide open.
- risk and benefits are considerable for both parties.
- the thin, short arrow indicates that level 3 interactions are the most uncommon, particularly in initial contacts, and the relationship between the parties must be trusting with a sharing of control.
- a positive relationship is essential for level 3 interactions.
COMMUNICATION INTERACTIONS:
Self-Disclosure
- in most interviews, you must move beyond level 1 to level 2 to level 3 to obtain information, detect feelings, discover insights, attain commitments, etc.
- this requires varying degrees of self-disclosure, and this may not be easy to do.
- unlike being a member of a group or audience into which you can blend or hide, the interview often places your social, professional, financial or physical welfare on the line.
- interviews deal with your behavior, your performance, your reputation, your decisions, your weaknesses, your feelings, your money or your future.
COMMUNICATION INTERACTIONS:
Self-Disclosure
continued
- it carries a degree of risk
- suggestions for reducing risk: be aware of the nature of your relationship with the other party, begin with a safe level of disclosure, be sure disclosure is relevant and appropriate, be sensitive to the effect your disclosure will have on the other party and persons not involved with the interview, continue to disclose at a level at which the other party reciprocates.
- we tend to have few inhibitions when interacting online and may disclose to much info , what some refer to as “hyperpersonal’” revelations - and this info may come earlier in online interactions.