Biopsychology - Biological Rhythms Flashcards
What are the key features of circadian rhythms?
- Biological rhythms governed by endogenous pacemakers and exogenous zeitgebers.
- The circadian rhythm lasts for about 24 hours.
- Sleep/wake cycle governed by internal and external mechanisms.
- Siffre demonstrated a free-running circadian rhythm of about 25 hours.
- Aschoff and Wever also found a similar circadian rhythm.
- Endogenous pacemakers may have stronger influence than exogenous zeitgebers.
What are biological rhythms governed by?
Biological rhythms are periodic activity, governed by:
- endogenous pacemakers (internal biological clocks)
- exogenous zeitgebers (external changes in the environment)
What are the 4 different biological rhythms?
- Ultradian rhythms: last less than 24 hours.
- Infradian rhythms: last longer than 24 hours.
- Circadian rhythms: last around 24 hours.
- Circannual rhythms: last around 12 months.
What is the sleep/wake cycle governed by?
The sleep/wake cycle is governed by internal and external mechanisms.
Exogenous zeitgebers - The fact that we feel drowsy when it’s night and alert during the day shows the effect of daylight.
Endogenous pacemakers - There is a basic rhythm governed by the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which lies just above the optic chiasm and receives information about light directly from this structure. The exogenous zeitgeber (light) can reset the suprachiasmatic nucleus.
What did Siffre demonstrate?
French caver Siffre spent long periods in dark caves to examine the effects of free-running biological rhythms - two months (in 1962) in the caves of the Southern Alps and six months (in the 1970s) in a Texan cave (when he was 60).
In each case study, Siffre’s free-running circadian rhythm settled down to just above the usual 24 hours (about 25 hours).
Importantly, he did have a regular sleep/wake cycle.
What did Aschoff and Wever find?
A group of participants spent four weeks in a World War 2 bunker deprived of natural light (Aschoff and Wever 1976).
All but one (whose sleep/wake cycle extended to 29 hours) displayed a circadian rhythm between 24 and 25 hours.
What do Siffre’s study and Aschoff and Wever’s study show?
Siffre’s experience and the bunker study suggest that the ‘natural’ sleep/wake cycle may be slightly longer than 24 hours but is entrained by exogenous zeitgebers associated with our 24-hour day (e.g. number of daylight hours, typical mealtimes, etc.).
What evidence suggests that endogenous pacemakers may have stronger influence than exogenous zeitgebers?
Folkard et al. (1985) studied a group of 12 people who live in a dark cave for three weeks, going to bed when the clock said 11:45pm and waking when it said 7:45am.
The researchers gradually sped up the clock (unbeknown to the participants) so an apparent 24-hour day eventually lasted only 22 hours.
Only one participant comfortably adjusted to the new regime. This suggests the existence of a strong free-running circadian rhythm that cannot easily be overridden by changes in the external environment.
What are the strengths of circadian rhythm research?
- practical application to shift work
- practical application to drug treatments
What are the weaknesses of circadian rhythm research?
- use of case studies and small samples in studies
- poor control in research studies
- individual differences may have an influence on results
What practical application to shift work is there of circadian rhythms?
Boivin et al. (1996) found shift workers experience a lapse of concentration around 6am (a circadian trough) so mistakes and accidents are more likely.
Research also suggests a link between shift work and poor health, with shift workers three times more likely to develop heart disease (Knutsson 2003).
Thus, research into the sleep/wake cycle may have economic implications in terms of how best to manage worker productivity.
What practical application to drug treatments is there of circadian rhythms?
Circadian rhythms coordinate the body’s basic processes (e.g. heart rate, hormone levels) with implications for pharmacokinetics (action of drugs on the body and how well they are absorbed and distributed).
Research shows there are times during the day or night when drugs are more effective. Guidelines have been developed for the timing of dosing for a range of drugs including treatments for cancer and epilepsy (Baraldo 2008).
Thus research into circadian rhythms may have real-life medical benefits.
Why is the use of case studies and small samples in circadian rhythm studies a limitation?
Studies of the sleep/wake cycle often use small groups of participants (e.g. Aschoff and Wever), or even single individuals (e.g. Siffre).
Participants may not be representative of the wider population and this limits making meaningful generalisations. Siffre observed that his internal clock ticked much more slowly at 60 than when he was younger.
This suggests that, even when the same person is involved, there are factors that may prevent general conclusions being drawn.
How is there poor control in circadian rhythm research studies?
Participants deprived of natural light still had access to artificial light (e.g. Siffre had a lamp turned on from when he woke up until he went to bed). Artificial light was assumed to have no effect on free-running rhythms.
But Czeisler et al. (1999) adjusted participants’ circadian rhythms from 22 to 28 hours using dim lighting. Using artificial light may be like taking a drug that resets participants’ biological clocks.
This suggests that researchers may have ignored an important confounding variable in circadian rhythm research.
How may individual differences have an influence on results found from circadian rhythm research studies?
An issue complicating the generalisation of findings from studies of the sleep/wake cycle is that individual cycles can vary from 13 to 65 hours (Czeisler et al. 1999).
Also, Duffy et al. (2001) found some people display a natural preference for sleeping and rising early (‘larks’) but others prefer the opposite (‘owls’). There are also ahe differences in sleep/wake patterns.
This means that findings from sleep/wake cycle studies may not fully represent individual differences within the population.