Biological 3: Dement & Kleitman Flashcards
What was the aim?
To see if REM sleep was related to PPs experience of dreaming by observing the length, frequency and patterns of REM sleep.
What was the background?
- range of explanations of dreams e.g Freud’s “road to the unconscious”
- sleep cycle= happens 5-7 times a night, goes from level 1 to 4 (deep sleep) and then extends to 2 whereby there are 10-15 mins of REM sleep
What were the 3 hypotheses?
H1= significant association between REM and dreaming
H2= positive correlation between estimate of time spent dreaming+measurement of REM SLEEP
H3= relationship between pattern of eye movement+reported content of dream
What were the controls?
- all PPs tested individually used EEG
- PPs told to eat normally but avoid caffeine and alcohol
- PPs slept in dark, quiet lab
- doorbell used to wake PPs
- tape recorder by bed used to record dreams
- PPs woken 351 times over 61 nights, average 5.7 times a night
How was H1 measured?
- various times during the night (some during REM some not) woken by doorbell
- PPs immediately asked to write whether they’d dreamt or not
- not told whether in REM or not
How was H2 measured?
- woken up either 5 or 15 mins into REM
* asked to estimate whether they’d been dreaming for 5 or 15 mins
How was H3 measured?
Woken after 4 patterns of eye movement once lasted 1 min
- Mainly vertical
- Mainly horizontal
- Both
- Very little or none
Asked to describe dream
What were the results of H1?
REM:
Recall= 152
None= 39
NON-REM
Recall= 11
None= 149
REM sleep predominately associated with dreaming
NREM awoke within 8 mins= remembering from previous
What were the results of H2?
After 5 mins:
Right= 45
Wrong= 6
After 15 mins:
Right= 47 Wrong= 13
Able to estimate accurately apart from PP DM who could only remember latter part of dream
What were the results of H3?
VERTICAL:
•cliff, hoisting machinery
•climbing ladder
•throwing balls at net
MIXTURE:
•Always looking at objects/people close to them
NONE:
•watching something from distance/staring fixedly at object
What are some evaluations?
PROS:
•highly controlled extraneous variable= no use of stimulants, location and sleeping time
•PPs recalled dreams= removed researcher bias when asking about dream
CONS:
•lack of Eco v= PPs had to sleep in a lab which could have affected sleep
•nature of waking up PPs may have affected recalling of dream
•small sample size= low reliability as easily distorted by individual differences
What are some possible improvements?
- test PPs in conditions of their own home= increase Eco v
- wider variety of PPs= more women, younger/older, children etc
- test other methods of waking e.g baby crying, birds, traffic