Benign Epi. Non Odontogenic Neoplasm Flashcards
Clinical picture of sq. Cell papilloma
1- Age- anyage mostly 4t-5” decades.
2- Sex- males - females. 3- Site buccal mucosa, gingiva, palate, lips and
tongue.
4- Size small (few millimeters to 3 cm). 5- Exophytic papilliferous growth made of
finger like projections givine (cauliflower
like or wart appearance).
6-Mainly solitary but may be multiple
in
immunosuppressed patients. 7- Mainly pedunculated or may be sessile.
8- Painless, non-contagious 9- Color reddish or whitish or same color as
oral mucosa.
Etiology of sq.c . Papilloma
Human papilloma virus (HPV-6 & HPV-11) in (50% of cases. Origin Is surface squamous epithelium.
Epidemiology → 3% of oral lesions.
Could sq.c.papilloma reoccur?
Good prognosis (rare recurrence) except in laryngeal cases.
Is keratoacanthoma benign or malignant?
> Some consider it as a benigni lesion resembling squamous cell carcinoma clinically and histologically, while others consider it a variant of sq.c.c
That can be self limiting
Causes of keratoacanthoma?
- hpv 9.11.13
- sun damage
- immuno suppression
- trauma
- genetic factors
- chemicals
Keratoacanthoma clinically is distinguished by?
-exophytic
-creater like
-sessile firm nodule with depression that contain black to brown plug
-not tinder but painful with lymphadenopathy
-in pielosebaceous glands in vermilion border and skin of H and N
-males to female 2 to 1
-age 50 to 70
-stages of growth:
1- growth stage– 4 to 6 w
2- stationary —stable for 6w
3-in volition phase – spontaneous regression in 6 to 12 m
Leaving a depressed scar after keratin plug expulsion
Treatment of keratoacanthoma
O
Differential diagnosis:
KERAT
Squamous cell carcinoma.
Verrucous carcinoma.
O Only large lesionsurgical excision to avoid scar formation. o Recurrence may occur with rare malignant transformation.
Focal epithelial hyperplasia vs errucous vulgaris in cause
- –Heck–
- hpv 13 and 32
- genetic background
- mal nutrition
- poor hygiene
- low socioeconomics
- –Verrucous vulgaris —
- hpv 40 and 4
- homeless
- poor hygiene
Focal epithelial hyperplasia vs errucous vulgaris site ?
H–
-LOWER LIP
VV—
- all skin specially hand and feet
- oral cavity by auto inucleation
Focal epithelial hyperplasia vs errucous vulgaris in histopathology
H–
-same as common warts but with no hyper keratosis
Vv—
-same as sq.c.papilloma
Focal epithelial hyperplasia vs errucous vulgaris in contagion and age
Same age both children
H—-
- non contagious
Vv—
Contagious
Focal epithelial hyperplasia vs errucous vulgaris shape
H–
Multiple pale and rough or smooth
Vv- solitary or multiple sessile