Authoritarian Politics Lecture 5: Party Creation as Autocratic Survival Strategy Flashcards
The power sharing bargain must be credible to both sides (T/F)
true. allies must believe that the dictator will comply, and the dictator must believe the allies will support him if he keeps his promises.
What is another problem with power sharing
the allies (military officers) cannot credibly promise to be loyal if they are internally factionalized
Who has bigger credibility problems? (D or M)
Although the dictator has a credibility problem in keeping his promises, the bigger problem is that the military cannot credibly commit to stay loyal and not to oust the dictator
Who has credibility problems?
both the dictator and the military
What is a solution to this power sharing problem
instead of getting rid of members of the inner circle, bring in new civilian allies for support!
Why does the Military have a bigger commitment problem?
because the military - if it is factionalized and/or undisciplined- has a control problem
what is the militaries control problem
It cannot prevent ‘rogue’ coups, i.e. coups by factions that are often lead by lower-ranked officers. (Why?)
If the dictator cannot trust the military officers’ ability to prevent rogue coups, there is little reason to comply and share power and resources - it will not protect him
what are several survival strategy eg when facing a factionalized support group
- give more money to the military
- promote loyal officers and retire or exile opponents
- create and control security police and paramiltary forces
- New Party Creation
What is the issue with strategies 1-3
they are risky because they are visible to the military and who may resist them
Why may New Party Creation be better?
- creating. civilian support group (new Party) to decrease the dependence on the military
- parties can mobilize mass civilian support in the form of demonstrations and elections
How can civillian support deter coups?
because military officers have a strong preference for unopposed coups
why do military officers have a strong preference for unopposed coups
- because party members may also serve as informants which may increase to risk to execute a coup
- Party official and party members have an interest in the dictator’s survival because they benefit in terms of positions, resources, and privileges.
If dictators really create new parties to guard themselves against the military, we should be able to observe the following
H1: Most newly created dictatorial support parties should be led either by the dictator himself or one of his relatives or close allies.
H2: Dictators create authoritarian support parties as part of an effort to marginalize armed supporters from policy-making.
H3: Parties should be created before elections that confirm the dictator as national executive.
H4: Military dictatorships led by junior officers should create more support parties than those led by higherranked officers.
H5: Dictator control over internal security services should be more likely in dictatorships that create a new support party than in those that do not.
H6: The establishment of new paramilitary forces to protect the dictator should be more likely in dictatorships that create a new support party than in those that do not.
Is the Creation of a New Party Initiated by the Dictator?
Yes, in three-quarters of all autocratic regimes in which a party was created after the seizure of power, either the dictator or a close relative led the party
Does the Creation of a New Party Happen Before Elections?
yes