Attachment - Explanations (Bowlby's theory) Flashcards
Bowlby’s theory
Monotropic (evolutionary theory)
Monotropic theory
Attachment to one caregiver that is more important than others (more time spent with them, the better)
Evolutionary explanation
Humans are subject to passing on adaptive genes (opposes learning theories) -> requiring emotional security, attachment is pre-programmed behaviour, occur in critical period
Principles of monotropic theory
Law of continuity -> more constant & predictable care creates better quality attachments
Law of accumulated separation -> effects of separation add up over time (safest dose of 0)
Social releasers
Behaviours that are innate (i.e smiling -> activate social interaction w/adults to develop attachment)
Both caregiver & child are hard-wired to become attached
Supporting evidence on social releasers
Brazelton et al -> observed babies triggering interactions with adults -> become increasingly distressed when ignored by the attachment figure
Contradictory evidence on social releasers
Genetic differences in anxiety & sociability -> impacting parent ability & behaviours of infant
Internal working model
Child form mental representation of relationship w/primary caregiver -> expectations for all future relationships
Supporting evidence of internal working model
Bailey et al - 99 mothers w/1 year old babies measuring attachment -> poor attachment with the mother’s primary attachment figure = poorly attached baby
Critical period
6 months - 2 years
Strengths of monotropic theory
Supporting evidence
(social releasers -> Brazelton -> supports idea of importance of attachment to primary figure & law of continuity)
(internal working model -> Bailey et al -> supports idea of evolutionary theory & increases validity)
Limitation of monotropic theory
Conflicting evidence (Schaffer & Emerson -> 18 months old children have 5 attachments w/mother not always being primary caregiver -> not detrimental to development as long as caregivers are sensitive to needs of child -> inaccurate)