Attachment - Effects of Institutionalisation Flashcards

1
Q

Romania in the 1980s

A
  • Communist ruler in power - Ceausescu
  • Wanted to increase population growth
  • Families expected to have 5 children
  • Contraception banned
  • Economy struggling - little resources for childcare
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Orphanage crisis

A
  • Parents unable to care for children
  • Over 100,000 children sent to orphanages
  • Conditions ranged from poor to appalling
  • Children confined to cots
  • Few toys or stimulation
  • Little interaction with caregivers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fall of Ceausescu

A
  • Killed on Christmas Day 1989
  • Orphanages exposed to international media
  • TV reports shocked viewers worldwide
  • Many families in UK moved to adopt Romanian children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

English and Romanian Adoptees study

A
  • Led by Michael Rutter - “father of child psychiatry”
  • Followed 165 Romanian orphans adopted in UK
  • Compared to 52 UK-born adopted children
  • Assessments at ages 4, 6, 11 and 15
  • Wanted to understand the effects of early deprivation and potential for recovery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Key findings: Early Adoption

A
  • Children adopted before 6 months showed rapid catch-up
  • Physical growth and cognitive abilities nearly normal by age 4
  • Performed similarly to UK-born adopted children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Key findings: Later Adoption

A
  • Children adopted after 6 months showed more problems
  • 4 main areas of concern identified:
    Quasi-Autism
    Disinhibited attachment
    Inattention + overactivity
    Cognitive impairment
  • Severity of issues correlated with time spent in institutions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Issue 1: Quasi-Autism

A
  • Not clinically autistic, but showed some symptoms
  • Difficulty understanding social contexts
  • Obsessive behaviours (fixation on specific objects)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Issue 2: Disinhibited Attachment

A
  • Inappropriate behaviour towards strangers
  • Lack of wariness in unfamiliar settings
  • Willingness to wander off with strangers
  • Possibly due to multiple, changing caregivers in orphanages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Issue 3: Inattention and Overactivity

A
  • Higher levels in children adopted after 6 months
  • Difficulty paying attention and concentrating
  • Challenges controlling impulses
  • Similar to symptoms of ADHD
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Issue 4: Cognitive Impairment

A
  • Lower IQ scores in children adopted later
  • Age 11:
    Adopted before 6 months - average IQ 102
    Adopted 6 months - 2 years - average IQ 86
    Adopted after 2 years - average IQ 77
  • Delayed intellectual development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rutter’s conclusions

A
  • Effects of institutional deprivation are not fixed
  • Many children can recover with support
  • Strong, supportive adoptive families can reverse damage
  • Early intervention is crucial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Advantages of Rutter’s research

A
  • Real-life application:
    Rutter’s study can helped with the development/enhancement of the effects of institutionalisation.
    Led to improvements in the conditions for children in institutions
    Children in institutional care are more likely to form a healthy attachment without much of the risk of disinhibited attachment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Disadvantages of Rutter’s research

A
  • Does not account individual differences between children:
    Not all institutions were the same and some children would have received varying levels of attention that could have influenced their ability to attach
    Decreases the validity into the effects of institutionalisation, as some children may be given more or less attention than others.

Atypical situation:
Romanian orphanages had particularly poorer standards and low levels of intellectual stimulation, which cannot be generalised to other institutions with better care#
Romanian orphan studies lack external validity as it doesn’t show how better-quality institutions could affect institutionalisation

Socially sensitive:
Results from Romanian orphans studies showed that late-adopted children typically have poor development
Whilst these children were growing up, teachers and parents and others would have lowered their expectations and treated the adopted children differently
Institutionalised children may be less favoured than children who were raised by their real parents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly