Attachment - Disruption to Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Give an outline of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis

A

If an infant was unable to form a ‘warm, intimate and continuous’ relationship with the mother/care-giver then the child would have difficulty forming relationships with others and be at risk of behavioural disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

State the 3 main aspects to Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis

A
  • Looks at importance of continuous relationships
  • Development during the critical period (2 1/2, after 5 children unable to cope with separation)
  • Used term ‘maternal’ not mother, monotropy does not have to be the mother.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 3 stages to short term separation and who came up with it?

A

PDD model, Robertson & Robertson:

  1. Protest (clinging to parents and fighting others, crying and screaming)
  2. Despair (clamer but still upset, may appear withdrawn)
  3. Detachment (may engage with others although be wary. Likely to reject care-giver upon return and show anger)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the procedure of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study

A

Selected an opportunity sample of children from the clinic where he worked, 44 being thieves and 44 for other issues. A social worker interviewed a parent to find out about the children’s early experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the IV and DV in Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A

IV: separation / non-separation
DV: thieves / non thieves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What kind of experiment was Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A

a natural experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the results from Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A

SEPARATED:
90% were thieves
67% were psychopathic

NOT SEPARATED:
37% were thieves
3% were psychopathic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain why Bowlby’s 44 thieves study was not a true experiment

A

He didn’t have full control

He didn’t randomly select his participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are methodological issues of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A
  • Interview based on self-report
  • Extraneous variables due to natural experiment
  • Correlational; cannot confirm cause and effect
  • Interviewer bias (his theory & experiment, likely to bias results)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a problem with Bowlby’s 44 thieves study being retrospective?

A

Unreliable because of memory (e.g might not remember how long they were separated for)
Researcher doesn’t know of other factors that could have contributed to psychopathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a positive implication of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis?

A

Prior to Bowlby’s work no attention was payed to children’s emotional needs. His theories changed attitudes and promoted mental well-being as well as physical well-being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a problem with the support for MDH coming from children in institutions?

A

May not be maternal deprivation, but other forms of deprivation which effected subsequent development.
Same types of children in institutions; low population validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Rutter conclude led to emotional maladjustment in his Isle of Wight study?

A

Found delinquency was most common in cases where boys had experienced separations due to discord in their families. This showed that family discord rather than separation on its own cause delinquency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

State a weakness with Bowlby’s MDH?

A

He didn’t distinguish between deprivation and privation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

State 2 pieces of research into privation

A
Genie (Curtiss)
Czech twins (Koluchova)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the background of Genie

A

History of severe isolation, neglect and physical restraint. Kept strapped to a potty and punished if she made a sound by her father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

In what condition was Genie found?

A

Found at 13
Appearance of a 6/7 year old
Unsocialised, primitive, hardly human
Didn’t speak and could hardly walk

18
Q

What was Genie’s result after intervention

A

Never achieved good social adjustments or language

19
Q

What was the background of the Czech twins?

A

Mother died after giving birth to twin boys. They went to a children’s home for 11 months and stayed with their aunt for 6 months, then their father and stepmother. Here, they were never allowed out the house and were kept in a small, unheated closet. They were discovered at 7

20
Q

In what condition were the Czech twins found?

A

Could hardly walk and had severe rickets

Fearful of spontaneous speech

21
Q

What was the Czech twin’s result after intervention?

A

Gains made after hospital and further care. Now adults, well adjusted and cognitively able

22
Q

What were the differences between Genie and the Czech twins?

A

Background: Genie was kept at the same place for the entirety of her privation, whereas the Czech twins moved to different locations with different carers.
Outcome: The twins finally adjusted in society, but Genie never did

23
Q

Give 3 evaluative points on case studies as a method of investigation

A
  • Ethical issue: Ongoing follow up could be seen as intrusive and some have claimed they are permanently damaged in later life
  • Methodological issues: hard to generalise as its based on an individual case
  • Useful: In depth studies looking at human behaviour that would otherwise be inaccessible
24
Q

What was the procedure of Hodges and Tizard’s study into long-term effects of privation?

A

Studied 65 children brought up in a children’s home until they were 4 where they were unable to form attachment with their carers. At 4, 25 of the children were restored to their biological parents, 33 were adopted and 7 returned to children’s home. They were re-visited at 8 and 16, observed through interviews and talking to carers/teachers to assess their attachment behaviours

25
Q

What were the results from Hodges and Tizard’s study?

A

Almost all of the adoptees and some of the restored children formed close attachments to their parents by age 8 and 16.

26
Q

What were the results from Hodges and Tizard’s study regarding relationships with peers and siblings?

A

The restored group had worse relationships with siblings than the adoptees.
All 3 groups raised in the institution had difficulties with peer relationships and were more likely to seek attention from adults

27
Q

Describe disinhibited behaviour patterns

A

Running to adults even if they’re strangers and demand attention in an indiscriminate manner.
Cry when adults left, despite having no attachments with them.

28
Q

What sampling issue is related to longitudinal research?

A

Participant attrition

People dropping out at different stages of the study, and those who continue may not be a representative group

29
Q

State one methodological and one ethical issue for Hodges and Tizard’s study

A
  • Methodological: The natural experiment means that the researches had no control over where the children went after age 4. This brings up the issue of how this was decided; they may have been differences e.g social skills
  • Ethical: Involves extremely sensitive areas of family relationships; need to ensure there was no pressure to continue ect.
30
Q

Name and explain the procedure of a longitudinal study into short and long term effects of privation

A

Rutter et al
Compared Romanian adoptees (from extremely bad conditions) with UK adoptees.
Looked at behaviour patterns at age 6. Some were followed up at age 11

31
Q

What were the results from Rutter’s study?

A

Disinhibited behaviour most common in late adopted Romanian children (26%). Rare in UK adoptees (3.8%) and early adopted Romanian children (9%). This suggests that disinhibited attachments are more likely in children who have experienced longer periods in institutions.

32
Q

What did Rutter find when looking at the children at aged 11?

A

54% of children with marked disinhibited attachments at age 6 still showed this at age 11.

33
Q

State 2 evaluative points about Rutter’s study

A
  1. Participant attrition is an issue in this longitudinal research study
  2. It was difficult to obtain information about the quality of care in many of the institutions in Romania (hard to assess the extent of privation in the early environments of the children in the study)
34
Q

State and explain a piece of research contradicting the findings of Rutter et al

A

Chisholm
Case study of 2 romanian children adopted into a Canadian family after extreme deprivation in an orphanage. He found that the children adapted well to the new family, concluding that there are likely to be individual differences in children’s responses to early privation

35
Q

What are the 4 factors affecting the reversibility of privation?

A
  • Quality of care at institution
  • Age when removed from privation/institutionalisation
  • Quality of care after privation/institutionalisation
  • Later-life experiences
36
Q

Name and describe a study looking at the quality of care at an institution as a factor of reversibility

A

Dontas et al
Looked at 15 babies between 7 and 9 months (critical period for developing attachments) in a Greek orphanage where each child formed attachments with 1 carer. They adjusted well and showed no signs of disinhibited attachments.

37
Q

Give an example of when age has affected the reversibility of privation

A

In Rutter et al’s study into Romanian adoptees, the earlier they were adopted the better they tended to make cognitive and emotional developmental progress.

38
Q

What area of development is age particularly important to?

A

Language

Good language catch up before puberty, much less likely to develop language after 11 or 12

39
Q

Give an example of where the quality of care after privation has affected the reversibility of privation

A

Hodges and Tizard
Adopted children more strongly attached to their new parents than the restored group. Due to the quality of care provided by the adoptive parents being more attentive.

40
Q

Name and describe a study where the follow up experiences later in life have affected the reversibility of privation

A

Quinton and Rutter
Compared 2 groups of women in their twenties, half brought up in care, half not, using a matched pairs design.
Care group more likely to have relationship breakdowns, criminal records, and parenting difficulties.
Also differences within care group; those with positive experiences in early adulthood led to different ‘developmental pathways’