Attachment Flashcards
Jaffe et al. (1973)
Reciprocity: infants coordinate their actions with caregivers in rhythm.
Brazelton (1979)
Reciprocity allows caregivers to respond quickly, this sensitivity is key for later attachment.
Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
Interactional synchrony: 3-week-old infants imitated facial features.
Metlzoff and Moore (1983)
Infants as young as 3 days old displayed interactional synchrony.
Piaget (1962)
‘Interactional synchrony’ was only pseudo-imitation. Operant conditioning explains the apparent synchrony and the infants do not know that they are imitating.
Murray and Trevarthen (1985)
When showed an unresponsive video of mothers’ faces, infants become distressed.
Koepke et al. (1983)
Failed to replicate findings of Meltzoff and Moore (1977).
Marian et al. (1996)
Failed to replicate findings of Murray and Trevarthen (1985).
Abravanel and DeYong (1991)
Infants imitate humans, not just any moving object.
Isabella et al. (1989)
Stongly attached infant-caregiver pairs showed more interactional synchrony.
Heimann (1989)
Infants who imitate more, from birth, have better quality relationships with their caregivers.
Meltzoff (2005)
‘Like me’ hypothesis: imitation develops ‘Theory of Mind’ and this affects later relationships.
Cohn et al (2014)
Stay at home dads have quadrupled in number over the past 28 years.
Rutter (1995)
All attachment figures are equal
Sagi et al (1994)
Closeness of attachment with mothers is half as common in collectivist cultures with communal childcare.
Lamb (1997)
No relationship between accessibility of the father and infant-father attachment.
Heerman et al. (1994)
Men are less sensitive to infant cues than women.
Frodi et al. (1978)
No physiological difference between men and women when both are shown footage of infants crying.
Frank et al. (1997)
When the father is the PCG in two-parent families, the role of primary attachment figure is shared by both parents.
Geiger (1996)
A father is more of an exciting, challenging, and physically active playmate than a PCG.
White and Woollett (1992)
Lack of paternal sensitivity can be positive as it fosters greater cognition and problem solving.
Guiton (1966)
Imprinted a yellow glove onto some leghorn chicks, later the male ducks tried to mate with the gloves. These effects could be reversed and normal sexual behaviour resumes.
Hoffman (1996)
Imprinting is more plastic and reversible than initially thought.