Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Reciprocity and interactional synchrony are both believed to?

A

Strengthen the bond between caregivers and infant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reciprocity in forming attachments -

A

Suggested infants coordinate their actions with caregivers in a kind of conversation, responding to an action with another similar action. Allows the caregiver to respond appropriately and sensitvely to the infant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Brazelton suggested about reciprocity that -

A

It is an important precursor to later communications, the regularity of the infants signals allows the caregiver to respond appropriately, and this sensitivity drives this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interactional synchrony -

A

Psychologists have described a certain different kind of attachment between caregiver and infant, can be described as being simultaneous and people tend to mirror. Explored by Meltzoff and Moore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Interactional synchrony study (1977) -

A
  • Systematic study
  • Infants as young as two/three weeks
  • Adult model displayed one of three facial features or hand movements
  • Dummy was placed in the mouth to avoid initial response
  • Found association between adult model and infant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A further study of Meltzoff and Moore up to 3 days babies producing the same response and this must suggest what about the behaviour? -

A

Must prove there is no possibility of the behaviour being learned so it must be innate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Schafer and Emerson conducted a study on the development of attachment called?

A

Glasgow babies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many infants in Glasgow study?

A

60

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Glasgow kids were studies up till the age of?

A

1 year (began between 5 and 23 weeks old)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The mothers of the Glasgow babies were visited every?

A

4 weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The mothers of the Glasgow babies asked them to respond on?

A

The infants response to:
- Separation in 7 episodes of everyday situations
-(Being left alone, with others)
- Rated on a 4 point scale
- Measured also stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Schafer and Emerson used the findings of the Glasgow babies to conduct a description of?

A

A description of how attachment develops and progresses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stage 1: asocial stage

A
  • Birth - 2 months
  • Similar response to all objects
  • Towards end show a greater preference to social stimuli
  • Interactional synchrony and reciprocity play a role during this time to shape attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stage 2: indiscriminate stage

A
  • 2 months
  • Become more social
  • Distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar people
  • Do not yet show stranger anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stage 3: Discriminate attachment

A
  • 7 months
  • Signs of separation anxiety
  • Said to have formed a primary attachment figure with one specific person
  • Begins to also show stranger anxiety
  • Found that the primary attachments weren’t necessarily the one who spend the most time with them but the one who responded to their sensitive needs the quickest, concluding that the primary attachment is based on quality and not quantity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stage 4: Multiple attachments

A
  • Around 9 months
  • Very soon after the main attachment is formed they form multiple attachments
  • Depends on the consistency of the other relationship.
  • These may be considered secondary relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cultural variations were studied by?

A

Van Ijendoorm and Krooneneberg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Cultural variations procedure and what were they interested in with intra and inter cultures?

A
  • Meta analysis of the findings of 32 attachment studies and constructed 2000 strange situations.
  • 8 different countries

Interested to see if there were inter-culture differences (between countries) and Intra-cultural differences (differences of findings within the same culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Cultural variations in attachment findings?

A
  • Found small differences
  • Secure attachment was the most common
  • Insecure-avoidant was the second most common and insecure-resistant was last.
  • Secure attachment is seen as the norm across cultures and universally suggests that it is the basis for a healthy social and emotional development.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Findings of Cultural variations in attachment Collectivist cultures -

A

Japan and Israel were found to have higher rates of insecure-resistant than avoidant which may be presented of a collectivist culture.

21
Q

Cultural differences may suggest that variations in attachment may not be all universally the same - German study

A

Grossman and Grossman found higher levels of insecure attachment among German infants, may be due to childrearing practices, where the culture involves keeping some interpersonal distance between infant and parents, so they would not engage in proximity seeking behaviour and therefore this would appear in the norm from the US strange situation it would appear that German infants appear insecurely attached.

22
Q

Who did the love quiz study for the influence of early attachment?

A

Hazen and Shaver

23
Q

‘Love quiz’ procedure -

A
  • Placed it in a news Gazette, and the quiz asked about current attachment experiences and about attachment history to identify current and childhood attachment types
  • The questions were used to assess the feelings of current love and an assessment of the internal working memory model.
  • Analysed 620 responses - 415 women and 205 men
24
Q

How many responses were analysed in the Love quiz and what was the number of males and females?

A

415 women and 205 men = 620 participants

25
Q

‘Love quiz’ findings Hazen and Shaver -

A

Analysed the self-report data
- Found S = 56%
- Found IA = 25%
- Found IR = 19%
- Found more importantly a positive correlation between attachment type and love experiences. So these experiences led them to on to long lasting love experiences of over 10 years.

26
Q

The role of the Father - (A01)

A
  • Seen to play a minor role in the parenting of child
  • However can be seen more to do with caregiving as Cohn found in the last 25 years the number of dads to stay at home instead of work has quadrupled .
  • Bowlby believed that children have only one primary attachment figure
  • Research has shown the father to be more of a playmate.
  • Found to be the bread winner of the family
27
Q

Several important factors have been identified that affect the relationship between fathers and children -

A

Degree of sensitivity - more secure attachments of those dads who are more sensitive towards their kids needs.

Type of attachment with their own parents - single-parent fathers tend to form attachments similar attachments with their children which they did with their own parents.

28
Q

Opener starter for a long answer question on the role of the father -

A

In Schaffer & Emerson’s 1960’s “Glasgow Babies” study they found that fathers were much less likely to be the primary attachment figure than mothers and, they explained this in terms of the father being the bread winner of the family and therefore less likely to be spending as much time with the infant, as the mother.

29
Q

Research has shown the importance of the father figure in the role of the father - Certain conditions for play mating roles from the father -

A

Fathers idea of being more eventful playmates can be from Geiger’s research where interactions are more exciting a pleasurable compared to mothers who are more loving and nurturing and affectionate. Lamb however suggested the attention of being a playmate is only relevant in some conditions when the child is in an emotional state and thus seeking stimulation so in this sense of the mother is the primary caregiver to look for and needed to overcome the conditions the child is facing. So suggesting the minor role they play in caregiving and their not effective for all situations.

30
Q

Men may not be physiologically equip to form an intense attachment style this may be from hormones -

A

May be biologically driven, for example the presence of women with Oestrogen underlies caring behaviour so they are suggested to reach more interpersonal goals than men. Suggesting mothers sensitivity towards their kids in order for them to grown and develop and lack of sensitivity to men due to the biological absence of much oestrogen in men. However, fathers who become primary attachment figures can be sensitive too, according to Lamb they can become a safe base from which to explore and quickly develop sensitivity to children needs. Therefore this disregards the idea of biological vulnerability and with the absence of oestrogen they can be good parental figures with sensitivity.

31
Q

Biological explanations read for role of the father -

A

Other explanations for mothers being more likely to be the primary attachment figure include biological differences between men and women, for example, female hormones such as oestrogen & oxytocin are associated with nurturing behaviour and some research has suggested that men are less sensitive in responding to infant cues, than mothers. This could mean that men are biologically disadvantaged in terms of making primary attachments with infants

32
Q

Father play a more important role in being?

A

Secondary attachment figures.

33
Q

Schaffer and Emerson found in the discriminate attachment stage about fathers -

A

between 7-9 months fathers were rarely the sole object of attachment and were around 3%.

34
Q

Lorenz full study -

Procedure
Findings
long lasting effects

A

Clutch of gosling eggs divided into two groups one left with natural mother the other within an incubator, when the incubator eggs first hatched they saw lorenz and started to follow him, to test this he marked the two groups distinctively of those with natural mother and lorenz eggs. (imprinting)

The goslings quickly divided themselves up one following the natural mother and lorenz group following him. If the animal is not exposed to the moving object during the critical period then they will not imprint.

Noticed long lasting effects, it was seen as irreverisble and long lasting for example one of the geese who imprinted on Lorenze would sleep with him every night.

35
Q

Harlow full study -
Procedure
Findings
Long lasting effects

A

Created two wired monkeys with a different head, one monkey with a cloth and the other not.
8 rhesus monkeys who were immediately separated at birth from original mother over a 165 day period, for 4 days the same amount of time was spent with each wired monkey which has the milk. Divided into 2 conditions. Measured how long the Monkeys spent with each wired monkey. Also studied monkeys response if a frightening object was placed in the cage what would they do?

All 8 monkeys spent most of their time with the cloth covered mothers whether or not they had the milk or not they spent a short time getting the milk and most of the time with the cloth covered mother, when frightened they clung to the cloth covered mother. Suggests that attachment doesn’t form from the one who feeds them but the one who offers the most contact comfort.

Long lasting effects - socially abnormal and froze or fled when approached by other monkeys and were sexually abnormal from different mating behaviour.

36
Q

Bowlby believed infants -

A

Needed a warm intimate and loving relationship between infant and caregiver and it wasn’t enough for a child to just be kept safe and fed.

37
Q

Bowlby critical period -

A

Children who were denied such care because of frequent or prolonged separation may become emotionally disturbed.

Said to happen before the age of 2.5 and a continued risk up to the age of 5.

38
Q

Long-term effects of maternal deprivation are -

A

Emotional maladjustment
Deprivation dwarfism
and mental health problems

39
Q

44 juvenile thieves Bowlby -

A

Considered to the children in his child guidance clinic in London and all were emotionally maladjusted he studies 88.

  • 44 thieves (caught stealing) - described as affectionless psychopaths - they could steal from others and it didn’t matter to them.
  • other 44 were a control group
40
Q

44 Juvenile thieves findings -

A

Those diagnosed as affectionless thieves were those that experienced early separations from their mother.
86% of the thieves were experienced early separations. None of the control group experiences early separations whereas 39% of all thieves had and received scarce visits from family.
Suggested there is correlation between there being a lack of continuous care and a risk of emotional maladjustment.

41
Q

Effects of institutionalisation is studies by?

A

Rutter and Sonuga Barke

42
Q

Rutter and SB - procedure

A

165 Romanian children , who suffered from the effects of institutionalisation, of this group 111 were adopted by the age of 2.5 and the remaining 54 by the age of 4 led a study called ‘ERA’ (English and Romanian adoptees).
Assessed a regular intervals to assess their physical and cognitive and social development.
They were compared to 52 British children adopted before the age of of 6 months.

43
Q

Rutter and SB - findings

A

At the time of adoption they lagged behind their British counterparts in terms of physical, cognitive and social development, evenly classed as mentally retarded by age of 4 some had caught up to the British counterparts. Was true for mist of the Romanian children adopted before the age of 6 months. Suggests long-term consequences may not be as severe as once thought if the child has a chance to form attachments in adoptive relationships, Vice versa if they do not form an attachment the consequences could be severe.

44
Q

Effects of institutionalisation -

A

Physical underdevelopment - usually tend to be physically small the lack of emotional care has caused deprivation dwarfism

Disinhibited attachment - a form of insecure attachments where individuals may be overfriendly with others there not familiar with.

Also go Poor parenting

45
Q

How many responses in Hazen and Schaver’s study?

A

620 - 415 women and 205

46
Q

Hazen and Shaver found in the self-report data similar findings of those in the SS -

A

SS
66 = S
22 = IA
12 = 12

LQ
56 = S
25 = IA
19 = IR

47
Q

Insecure avoidant and insecure resistant difference -

A

IA - tend to avoid social interaction with others and intimacy happy to explore with or without the presence of their caregivers.

IR - Those who reject and seek intimacy and social interaction

48
Q

How many assessed in Ainsworth study?

A

106 middle classed infants.