ASBHDS - Session 2 Flashcards
Define ‘determinants of health’
A range of factors that have a powerful and cumulative effect on the health of populations, communities and individuals. Eg. physical environment, social/economic environment, individual genetics, characteristics and behaviours
Describe briefly the history of health promotion in developed countries
1910s-1940s: Public Health (reform of physical environment)
1950s-1960s: Health Education (target individual health behaviour)
1970s onwards: Health Promotion (broader political/social approach to health)
Define ‘health promotion’
The process of enabling people to increase control over and to improve their health
What are the seven principles of health promotion?
1) empowering
2) participatory
3) holistic
4) intersectoral
5) equitable
6) sustainable
7) multi-strategy
What’s the difference between health promotion and public health?
Public health places more emphasis on the end goals, while health promotion is about the MEANS of achieving the goals (education and healthy public policy).
What are the three aspects of health which are critiqued in a sociological perspective on health promotion?
1) structural critiques
2) surveillance critiques
3) consumption critiques
What are the five approaches to health promotion?
1) medical/preventative
2) behaviour change
3) educational
4) empowerment
5) social change
What is the aim of primary prevention?
The prevent the onset of disease or injury by reducing exposure to risk factors
What are the approaches to primary prevention?
- immunisation
- prevention of contact with environmental risk factors
- taking appropriate precautions concerning communicable disease
- reducing risk factors from health related behaviours
What is the aim of secondary prevention?
To detect and treat a disease or its risk factors at an early stage to prevent progression/potential future complications and disabilities from the disease - mostly types of screening, eg screening for cervical cancer
What is the aim of tertiary prevention?
To minimise the effects of established disease, eg renal transplants or steroids for asthma
Explain this ‘health promotion dilemma’: the ethics of interfering in people’s lives
- potential negative psychological impact of health promotion messages
- state intervention into individuals’ lives may be seen as too great
Explain this ‘health promotion dilemma’: victim blaming
Focusing on individual behavioural change plays down the impact of wider socioeconomic and environmental determinants of health
Explain this ‘health promotion dilemma’: ‘fallacy of empowerment’
Giving people information does not give them power, and unhealthy lifestyles are not due to ignorance but due to adverse circumstances
Explain this ‘health promotion dilemma’: reinforcing of negative stereotypes
Health promotion messages have the potential to reinforce negative stereotypes associated with a condition or group, eg leaflets aimed at HIV prevention in drug users suggest that they are to blame
Explain this ‘health promotion dilemma’: unequal distribution of responsibility
Implementing healthy behaviours in the family is often left to women
What is the ‘prevention paradox’?
The idea that interventions that make a difference at population level might not have that much effect on the individual. This has a link with lay beliefs, as people may not see themselves as a ‘candidate’ for disease and therefore ignore the health warnings, and may also be aware of anomalies and randomness of disease
Define ‘evaluation’
The rigorous and systematic collection of data to assess the effectiveness of a program in achieving predetermined objectives