Accuracy of Eye Witness Testimony AO1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Why is research into the accuracy of eye witness testimonies done?

A
  • convictions of law are often based on eye witness testemonies yet 75% of cases ,proven by DNA evidence, showed false convictions due to their lack of accuracy
  • therefore it’s important to understand why their is a lack of accuracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What affects the accurcay of eye witness testimonies?

A
  1. misleading information
  2. anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What causes misleading question in eye witness testimonies?

A
  1. leading questions
  2. post event-discussion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is leading questions?

A

a question that promps or encourages the answer wanted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What evidence is their to support the effects of leading questions?

A

Loftus’ and Palmer’s experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe Loftus’ and Palmer’s experiment.

A
  • 45 American students were collected via oppotunity sampling
  • they were then shown a clip of a car accident involving multiple cars
  • the sample were divided into different condition where they were asked how fast the cars were going when they ———-
  • the verb changed depending on which conditon the sample was put in
  • the verbs that could have been said were hit, smashed, collided, bumped and contacted
  • as a follow up question they were also asked if they’d seen broken glass
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the findings of Loftus’ and Palmer’s experiment?

A
  • those who’s verb was smashed estimated they were going 41mph on average
  • those who’s verb was hit estimated they were going 34 mph on average
  • 32% of those who’s verb was smashed said they saw broken glass
  • 14% of those who’s verb was hit said they saw broken glass
    this showed that leading questions has a clear effect on EWT and can result in either response bias or reconstuctive hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is response bias?

A

when leading questions suggest an appropriate response for the participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is reconstructive hypothesis?

A

when leading questions alter a person’s memory of an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is post event discussion?

A

a potential source of misleading information where witnesses discuss what they saw after the event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the types of post-event discussion?

A
  1. conformity effect
  2. repeat interviewing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the conformity effect?

in post event discussion

A
  • co-witnesses might reach a unanimous view of what happened
  • research showed that this can cause more items to be mistakenly recalled compared to if participants were asked individually
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is repeat interviewing?

A
  • comments from the interviewer could become incorporated into recollaction of events which alters their memory of events
  • occurs especially when interviewing children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does anxiety affect EWT?

A

it can increase and decrease the accuracy of eye witness testemony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can anxiety have a negative affect on memory?

A

anxiety creates physiological arousal which prevents paying attention to cues. this makes recall worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What evidence is there to support the negative affect of anxiety on EWT?

A

Johnson’s and Scott’s experiment

17
Q

Describe Johnson’s and Scott’s experiment.

on the negative affect of anxiety

A
  • they led participants to believe they were taking part in a lab study
  • while in the ‘waiting room’ they experienced two conditions
  • one condition was high anxiety with the participants hearing an argument, glass break and then a man walk in with a bloody knife
  • another condition was low anxiety with someone walking in carring a pen in a greasy hand
18
Q

Describe the findings of Johnson’s and Scott’s experiment

on the negative affect of anxiety

A
  • 49% of participants who saw the man with the pen could identify him
  • 33% of the participants who saw the man with the knife could idenify him
    this shows that anxiety decreases the accuraxy of EWT
19
Q

How can anxiety have a positive affect on memory?

A

anxiety creates physiological arousal which truggers the fight-or-flight response and therefore increases alertness. this improves memory as we become more aware of cues

20
Q

What evidence is there to support the positive affect of anxiety on EWT?

A

Yuille’s and Cutshall’s experiment

21
Q

Describe Yuille’s and Cutshall’s experiment.

evidence to show the positive affect of anxiety on EWT

A
  • 13/21 participants who witnessed a real-life shooting were interviewed 4-5 minths after the incidence
  • accuracuy was determined by the number of details reported in each account of events
  • they were also asked how stressed they were from a scale of 1-7 and if they had any emotional issues
22
Q

Describe the findings of Yuille’s and Cutshall’s experiment?

evidence to show the positive affect of anxiety on EWT

A
  • those with the highest level of stress were most accurate with an accuracy of 88% com pared to the less stressed people’s 75%

this shows that the more stressed you are (more anxious) the better your recall