Accounting Policies Flashcards
Introduction
The selection and application of accounting policies is obviously crucial in the preparation of financial statements. As a general premise, the whole purpose of accounting standards is to specify required accounting policies, presentation and disclosure.
However, judgement will always remain; many standards may allow choices to accommodate different views, and no body of accounting literature could hope to prescribe precise treatments for all possible situations.
The selection and application of accounting policies is obviously crucial in the preparation of financial statements. As a general premise, the whole purpose of accounting standards is to specify required accounting policies, presentation and disclosure.
However, judgement will always remain; many standards may allow choices to accommodate different views, and no body of accounting literature could hope to prescribe precise treatments for all possible situations.
General principles
IAS 1 deals with some general principles relating to accounting policies, with IAS 8 discussing the detail of selection and application of individual accounting policies and their disclosure.
The general principles discussed by IAS 1 can be described as follows: • fair presentation and compliance with accounting standards; • going concern; • the accrual basis of accounting; • consistency; • materiality and aggregation; • offsetting; • profit or loss for the period.
IAS 1 deals with some general principles relating to accounting policies, with IAS 8 discussing the detail of selection and application of individual accounting policies and their disclosure.
The general principles discussed by IAS 1 can be described as follows: • fair presentation and compliance with accounting standards; • going concern; • the accrual basis of accounting; • consistency; • materiality and aggregation; • offsetting; • profit or loss for the period.
General principles - Fair presentation 1
Consistent with its objective and statement of the purpose of financial statements, IAS 1 requires that financial statements present fairly the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of an entity.
Fair presentation for these purposes requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the Conceptual Framework
Consistent with its objective and statement of the purpose of financial statements, IAS 1 requires that financial statements present fairly the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of an entity.
Fair presentation for these purposes requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the Conceptual Framework
General principles - Fair presentation 2
A fair presentation requires an entity to:
(a) select and apply accounting policies in accordance with IAS 8, which also sets out a hierarchy of authoritative guidance that should be considered in the absence of an IFRS that specifically applies to an item
(b) present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;
(c) provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
A fair presentation requires an entity to:
(a) select and apply accounting policies in accordance with IAS 8, which also sets out a hierarchy of authoritative guidance that should be considered in the absence of an IFRS that specifically applies to an item
(b) present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;
(c) provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
General principles - Going concern 1
When preparing financial statements, IAS 1 requires management to make an assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. This term is not defined, but its meaning is implicit in the requirement of the standard that financial statements should be prepared on a going concern basis unless management either intends to liquidate the entity or to
cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
The standard goes on to require that when management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, those uncertainties should be disclosed.
When preparing financial statements, IAS 1 requires management to make an assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. This term is not defined, but its meaning is implicit in the requirement of the standard that financial statements should be prepared on a going concern basis unless management either intends to liquidate the entity or to
cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
The standard goes on to require that when management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, those uncertainties should be disclosed.
General principles - Going concern 2
When financial statements are not prepared on a going concern basis, that fact should be disclosed, together with the basis on which the financial statements are prepared and the reason why the entity is not regarded as a going concern.
When financial statements are not prepared on a going concern basis, that fact should be disclosed, together with the basis on which the financial statements are prepared and the reason why the entity is not regarded as a going concern.
General principles - Going concern 3
In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, the standard requires that all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period should be taken into account. The degree of consideration required will depend on the facts in each case.
In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, the standard requires that all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period should be taken into account. The degree of consideration required will depend on the facts in each case.
General principles - Going concern 4
When an entity has a history of profitable operations and ready access to financial resources, a
conclusion that the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate may be reached without detailed analysis. In other cases, management may need to consider a wide range of factors relating to current and expected profitability, debt repayment schedules
and potential sources of replacement financing before it can satisfy itself that the going concern basis is appropriate.
When an entity has a history of profitable operations and ready access to financial resources, a
conclusion that the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate may be reached without detailed analysis. In other cases, management may need to consider a wide range of factors relating to current and expected profitability, debt repayment schedules
and potential sources of replacement financing before it can satisfy itself that the going concern basis is appropriate.
General principles - Going concern 5
There is no guidance in the standard concerning what impact there should be on the financial statements if it is determined that the going concern basis is not appropriate. Accordingly, entities will need to consider carefully their individual circumstances to arrive at an appropriate basis.
There is no guidance in the standard concerning what impact there should be on the financial statements if it is determined that the going concern basis is not appropriate. Accordingly, entities will need to consider carefully their individual circumstances to arrive at an appropriate basis.
General principles - The accrual basis of accounting 1
IAS 1 requires that financial statements be prepared, except for cash flow information, using the accrual basis of accounting. No definition of this is given by the standard, but an explanation is presented that ‘When the accrual basis of accounting is used, items are recognised as assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses (the elements of financial statements) when they satisfy the definitions and recognition criteria for those elements in the Conceptual Framework.’
IAS 1 requires that financial statements be prepared, except for cash flow information, using the accrual basis of accounting. No definition of this is given by the standard, but an explanation is presented that ‘When the accrual basis of accounting is used, items are recognised as assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses (the elements of financial statements) when they satisfy the definitions and recognition criteria for those elements in the Conceptual Framework.’
General principles - The accrual basis of accounting 2
The Conceptual Framework explains the accruals basis as follows :
‘Accrual accounting depicts the effects of transactions and other events and circumstances on a reporting
entity’s economic resources and claims in the periods in which those effects occur, even if the resulting cash receipts and payments occur in a different period. This is important because information about a reporting entity’s economic resources and claims and changes in its economic resources and claims during a period provides a better basis for assessing the entity’s past and future performance than information solely about cash receipts and payments during that period.’
The Conceptual Framework explains the accruals basis as follows :
‘Accrual accounting depicts the effects of transactions and other events and circumstances on a reporting
entity’s economic resources and claims in the periods in which those effects occur, even if the resulting cash receipts and payments occur in a different period. This is important because information about a reporting entity’s economic resources and claims and changes in its economic resources and claims during a period provides a better basis for assessing the entity’s past and future performance than information solely about cash receipts and payments during that period.’
General principles - Consistency 1
One of the objectives of both IAS 1 and IAS 8 is to ensure the comparability of financial statements with those of previous periods. To this end, each standard addresses the principle of consistency.
One of the objectives of both IAS 1 and IAS 8 is to ensure the comparability of financial statements with those of previous periods. To this end, each standard addresses the principle of consistency.
General principles - Consistency 2
IAS 1 requires that the ‘presentation and classification’ of items in the financial statements be retained from one period to the next unless:
(a) it is apparent, following a significant change in the nature of the entity’s operations or a review of its financial statements, that another presentation or classification would be more appropriate having regard to the criteria for the selection and application of accounting policies in IAS 8 or
(b) an IFRS requires a change in presentation.
IAS 1 requires that the ‘presentation and classification’ of items in the financial statements be retained from one period to the next unless:
(a) it is apparent, following a significant change in the nature of the entity’s operations or a review of its financial statements, that another presentation or classification would be more appropriate having regard to the criteria for the selection and application of accounting policies in IAS 8 or
(b) an IFRS requires a change in presentation.
General principles - Consistency 3
The standard goes on to amplify this by explaining that a significant acquisition or disposal, or a review of the presentation of the financial statements, might suggest that the financial statements need to be presented differently.
An entity should change the presentation of its financial statements only if the changed presentation provides information that is reliable and is more relevant to users of the financial statements and the revised structure is likely to continue, so that comparability is not impaired. When making such changes in presentation, an entity will need to reclassify its comparative information
The standard goes on to amplify this by explaining that a significant acquisition or disposal, or a review of the presentation of the financial statements, might suggest that the financial statements need to be presented differently.
An entity should change the presentation of its financial statements only if the changed presentation provides information that is reliable and is more relevant to users of the financial statements and the revised structure is likely to continue, so that comparability is not impaired. When making such changes in presentation, an entity will need to reclassify its comparative information
General principles - Consistency 4
IAS 8 addresses consistency of accounting policies and observes that users of financial statements need to be able to compare the financial statements of an entity over time to identify trends in its financial position, financial performance and cash flows. For this
reason, the same accounting policies need to be applied within each period and from one period to the next unless a change in accounting policy meets certain criteria. Accordingly, the standard requires that accounting policies be selected and applied consistently for similar transactions, other events and conditions, unless an IFRS specifically requires or permits categorisation of items for which different policies may be appropriate. If an IFRS requires or permits such categorisation, an appropriate accounting policy should be selected and applied consistently to each category.
IAS 8 addresses consistency of accounting policies and observes that users of financial statements need to be able to compare the financial statements of an entity over time to identify trends in its financial position, financial performance and cash flows. For this
reason, the same accounting policies need to be applied within each period and from one period to the next unless a change in accounting policy meets certain criteria. Accordingly, the standard requires that accounting policies be selected and applied consistently for similar transactions, other events and conditions, unless an IFRS specifically requires or permits categorisation of items for which different policies may be appropriate. If an IFRS requires or permits such categorisation, an appropriate accounting policy should be selected and applied consistently to each category.
General principles - Materiality and aggregation 1
Financial statements result from processing large numbers of transactions or other events that are aggregated into classes according to their nature or function. The final stage in the process of aggregation and classification is the presentation of condensed
and classified data, which form line items in the financial statements, or in the notes. The extent of aggregation versus detailed analysis is clearly a judgemental one, with either extreme eroding the usefulness of the information.
Financial statements result from processing large numbers of transactions or other events that are aggregated into classes according to their nature or function. The final stage in the process of aggregation and classification is the presentation of condensed
and classified data, which form line items in the financial statements, or in the notes. The extent of aggregation versus detailed analysis is clearly a judgemental one, with either extreme eroding the usefulness of the information.
General principles - Materiality and aggregation 2
IAS 1 resolves this issue with the concept of materiality, by requiring:
• each material class of similar items to be presented separately in the financial statements; and
• items of a dissimilar nature or function to be presented separately unless they are
immaterial.
IAS 1 resolves this issue with the concept of materiality, by requiring:
• each material class of similar items to be presented separately in the financial statements; and
• items of a dissimilar nature or function to be presented separately unless they are
immaterial.
General principles - Materiality and aggregation 3
The standard also states when applying IAS 1 and other IFRSs an entity should decide, taking into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances, how it aggregates information in the financial statements, which include the notes.
In particular, the understandability of financial statements should not be reduced by obscuring material information with immaterial information or by aggregating material items that have different natures or functions.
The standard also states when applying IAS 1 and other IFRSs an entity should decide, taking into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances, how it aggregates information in the financial statements, which include the notes.
In particular, the understandability of financial statements should not be reduced by obscuring material information with immaterial information or by aggregating material items that have different natures or functions.
General principles - Materiality and aggregation 4
Materiality is defined by both IAS 1 and IAS 8 as follows.
‘Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size and nature of the omission or misstatement judged in the surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a combination of both, could be the determining factor.’
Board is in the process of changing this definition to align with the new Conceptual Framework (refer latest definition materiality)
Materiality is defined by both IAS 1 and IAS 8 as follows.
‘Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size and nature of the omission or misstatement judged in the surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a combination of both, could be the determining factor.’
Board is in the process of changing this definition to align with the new Conceptual Framework (refer latest definition materiality)
General principles - Materiality and aggregation 5
At a general level, applying the concept of materiality means that a specific disclosure required by an IFRS to be given in the financial statements (including the notes) need not be provided if the information resulting from that disclosure is not material.
This is the case even if the IFRS contains a list of specific requirements or describes them as minimum requirements. On the other hand, the provision of additional disclosures should be considered when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users of financial statements to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
At a general level, applying the concept of materiality means that a specific disclosure required by an IFRS to be given in the financial statements (including the notes) need not be provided if the information resulting from that disclosure is not material.
This is the case even if the IFRS contains a list of specific requirements or describes them as minimum requirements. On the other hand, the provision of additional disclosures should be considered when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users of financial statements to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
General principles - Materiality and aggregation 6
IAS 1 and IAS 8 go on to observe that assessing whether an omission or misstatement could influence economic decisions of users, and so be material, requires consideration of the characteristics of those users.
For these purposes, users are assumed to have a
reasonable knowledge of business and economic activities and accounting and a willingness to study the information with reasonable diligence. Therefore, the
assessment of materiality needs to take into account how users with such attributes could reasonably be expected to be influenced in making economic decisions.
IAS 1 and IAS 8 go on to observe that assessing whether an omission or misstatement could influence economic decisions of users, and so be material, requires consideration of the characteristics of those users.
For these purposes, users are assumed to have a
reasonable knowledge of business and economic activities and accounting and a willingness to study the information with reasonable diligence. Therefore, the
assessment of materiality needs to take into account how users with such attributes could reasonably be expected to be influenced in making economic decisions.
General principles - Materiality and aggregation 7
Regarding the presentation of financial statements, IAS 1 requires that if a line item is not individually material, it should be aggregated with other items either on the face of those statements or in the notes.
The standard also states that an item that is not sufficiently material to justify separate presentation on the face of those statements may nevertheless be sufficiently material for it to be presented separately in the notes.
Regarding the presentation of financial statements, IAS 1 requires that if a line item is not individually material, it should be aggregated with other items either on the face of those statements or in the notes.
The standard also states that an item that is not sufficiently material to justify separate presentation on the face of those statements may nevertheless be sufficiently material for it to be presented separately in the notes.
General principles - Offset 1
IAS 1 considers it important that assets and liabilities, and income and expenses, are reported separately.
This is because offsetting in the statement of profit or loss or statement of comprehensive income or the statement of financial position, except when
offsetting reflects the substance of the transaction or other event, detracts (reduce) from the ability of users both to understand the transactions, other events and conditions that have occurred and to assess the entity’s future cash flows.
IAS 1 considers it important that assets and liabilities, and income and expenses, are reported separately.
This is because offsetting in the statement of profit or loss or statement of comprehensive income or the statement of financial position, except when
offsetting reflects the substance of the transaction or other event, detracts (reduce) from the ability of users both to understand the transactions, other events and conditions that have occurred and to assess the entity’s future cash flows.
General principles - Offset 2
It clarifies, though, that measuring assets net of valuation allowances – for example, obsolescence allowances on inventories and doubtful debts allowances on receivables – is not offsetting.
It clarifies, though, that measuring assets net of valuation allowances – for example, obsolescence allowances on inventories and doubtful debts allowances on receivables – is not offsetting.
General principles - Offset 3
Accordingly, IAS 1 requires that assets and liabilities, and income and expenses, should not be offset unless required or permitted by an IFRS.
Accordingly, IAS 1 requires that assets and liabilities, and income and expenses, should not be offset unless required or permitted by an IFRS.
General principles - Offset 4a
Just what constitutes offsetting, particularly given the rider noted above of ‘reflecting the substance of the transaction’, is not always obvious. IAS 1 expands on its meaning as follows. It notes that:
(a) IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers – defines revenue from contracts with customers and requires it to be measured at the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services, taking into account the amount of any trade discounts and volume rebates allowed by the entity – in other words a notional ‘gross’ revenue and a discount should not be shown separately, but should be ‘offset’.
Just what constitutes offsetting, particularly given the rider noted above of ‘reflecting the substance of the transaction’, is not always obvious. IAS 1 expands on its meaning as follows. It notes that:
(a) IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers – defines revenue from contracts with customers and requires it to be measured at the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services, taking into account the amount of any trade discounts and volume rebates allowed by the entity – in other words a notional ‘gross’ revenue and a discount should not be shown separately, but should be ‘offset’.
General principles - Offset 4b
(b) entities can undertake, in the course of their ordinary activities, other transactions that do not generate revenue but are incidental to the main revenue-generating activities. The results of such transactions should be presented, when this presentation reflects the substance of the transaction or other event, by netting any income with related expenses arising on the same transaction. For example:
(i) gains and losses on the disposal of non-current assets, including investments and operating assets, should be reported by deducting from the proceeds on disposal the carrying amount of the asset and related selling expenses; and
(ii) expenditure related to a provision that is recognised in accordance with IAS 37 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets – and reimbursed under a contractual arrangement with a third party (for example, a supplier’s warranty agreement) may be netted against the related reimbursement;
(b) entities can undertake, in the course of their ordinary activities, other transactions that do not generate revenue but are incidental to the main revenue-generating activities. The results of such transactions should be presented, when this presentation reflects the substance of the transaction or other event, by netting any income with related expenses arising on the same transaction. For example:
(i) gains and losses on the disposal of non-current assets, including investments and operating assets, should be reported by deducting from the proceeds on disposal the carrying amount of the asset and related selling expenses; and
(ii) expenditure related to a provision that is recognised in accordance with IAS 37 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets – and reimbursed under a contractual arrangement with a third party (for example, a supplier’s warranty agreement) may be netted against the related reimbursement;
General principles - Offset 4c
(c) gains and losses arising from a group of similar transactions should be reported on a net basis, for example, foreign exchange gains and losses or gains and losses arising on financial instruments held for trading. However, such gains and losses should be reported separately if they are material.
(c) gains and losses arising from a group of similar transactions should be reported on a net basis, for example, foreign exchange gains and losses or gains and losses arising on financial instruments held for trading. However, such gains and losses should be reported separately if they are material.
General principles - Profit or loss for the period 1
The final provision of IAS 1 which we term a general principle is a very important one. It is that, unless an IFRS requires or permits otherwise, all items of income and expense recognised in a period should be included in profit or loss. [IAS 1.88].
This is the case whether one combined statement of comprehensive income is presented or whether a separate statement of profit or loss is presented
The final provision of IAS 1 which we term a general principle is a very important one. It is that, unless an IFRS requires or permits otherwise, all items of income and expense recognised in a period should be included in profit or loss. [IAS 1.88].
This is the case whether one combined statement of comprehensive income is presented or whether a separate statement of profit or loss is presented
General principles - Profit or loss for the period 2
Income and expense are not defined by the standard IAS 1 IAS 8, but they are defined by the Conceptual Framework as follows:
(a) income is increases in assets, or decreases in liabilities, that result in increases in equity, other than those relating to contributions from holders of equity claims; and
(b) expenses are decreases in assets, or increases in liabilities, that result in decreases in equity, other than those relating to distributions to holders of equity claims.
Income and expense are not defined by the standard IAS 1 IAS 8, but they are defined by the Conceptual Framework as follows:
(a) income is increases in assets, or decreases in liabilities, that result in increases in equity, other than those relating to contributions from holders of equity claims; and
(b) expenses are decreases in assets, or increases in liabilities, that result in decreases in equity, other than those relating to distributions to holders of equity claims.
General principles - Profit or loss for the period 3
These definitions clearly suggest to us that the terms do not have what many would consider their natural meaning, as they encompass all gains and losses (for example, capital appreciation in a non-current asset like property). There is a somewhat awkward compromise with various gains and losses either required or permitted to bypass profit or loss and be reported instead in ‘other comprehensive income’. Importantly, profit and loss, and other comprehensive income may each be reported as a separate statement.
These definitions clearly suggest to us that the terms do not have what many would consider their natural meaning, as they encompass all gains and losses (for example, capital appreciation in a non-current asset like property). There is a somewhat awkward compromise with various gains and losses either required or permitted to bypass profit or loss and be reported instead in ‘other comprehensive income’. Importantly, profit and loss, and other comprehensive income may each be reported as a separate statement.
General principles - Profit or loss for the period 4a
IAS 1 notes that some IFRSs specify circumstances when an entity recognises particular items outside profit or loss, including the effect of changes in accounting policies and error corrections. Other IFRSs deal with items that may meet the Framework’s definitions of income or expense but are usually excluded from profit or loss.
IAS 1 notes that some IFRSs specify circumstances when an entity recognises particular items outside profit or loss, including the effect of changes in accounting policies and error corrections. Other IFRSs deal with items that may meet the Framework’s definitions of income or expense but are usually excluded from profit or loss.
General principles - Profit or loss for the period 4b
Examples include:
(a) changes in revaluation surplus relating to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets;
(b) remeasurements on defined benefit plans in accordance with IAS 19;
(c) gains and losses arising from translating the financial statements of a foreign operation;
(d) gains and losses from investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income;
(e) gains and losses on financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income;
Examples include:
(a) changes in revaluation surplus relating to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets;
(b) remeasurements on defined benefit plans in accordance with IAS 19;
(c) gains and losses arising from translating the financial statements of a foreign operation;
(d) gains and losses from investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income;
(e) gains and losses on financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income;
General principles - Profit or loss for the period 4c
Examples include:
(f) the effective portion of gains and losses on hedging instruments in a cash flow hedge and the gains and losses on hedging instruments that hedge investments in equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income;
(g) for particular liabilities designated as at fair value through profit and loss, fair value changes attributable to changes in the liability’s credit risk;
Examples include:
(f) the effective portion of gains and losses on hedging instruments in a cash flow hedge and the gains and losses on hedging instruments that hedge investments in equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income;
(g) for particular liabilities designated as at fair value through profit and loss, fair value changes attributable to changes in the liability’s credit risk;
General principles - Profit or loss for the period 4d
Examples include:
(h) changes in the value of the time value of options when separating the intrinsic value and time value of an option contract and designating as the hedging
instrument only the changes in the intrinsic value;
(i) changes in the value of the forward elements of forward contracts when separating the forward element and spot element of a forward contract and designating as the hedging instrument only the changes in the spot element, and changes in the value of the foreign currency basis spread of a financial instrument when excluding it from the designation of that financial instrument as the hedging instrument;
Examples include:
(h) changes in the value of the time value of options when separating the intrinsic value and time value of an option contract and designating as the hedging
instrument only the changes in the intrinsic value;
(i) changes in the value of the forward elements of forward contracts when separating the forward element and spot element of a forward contract and designating as the hedging instrument only the changes in the spot element, and changes in the value of the foreign currency basis spread of a financial instrument when excluding it from the designation of that financial instrument as the hedging instrument;
Practice Statement 2 – Making Materiality Judgements 2
Statement 2 addresses three main areas:
- the general characteristics of materiality;
- a four-step process that may be applied in making materiality judgements when preparing financial statements (the ‘materiality process’); and
- guidance on how to make materiality judgements in relation to the following:
- prior period information,
- errors,
- information about covenants; and
- interim reporting.
Statement 2 addresses three main areas:
- the general characteristics of materiality;
- a four-step process that may be applied in making materiality judgements when preparing financial statements (the ‘materiality process’); and
- guidance on how to make materiality judgements in relation to the following:
- prior period information,
- errors,
- information about covenants; and
- interim reporting.
Practice Statement 2 – Making Materiality Judgements : General characteristics of materiality 1
Definition of material :
‘Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size and nature of the omission or misstatement judged in the surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a combination of both, could be the determining factor’
Practice Statement 2 – Making Materiality Judgements : General characteristics of materiality
Definition of material :
‘Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size and nature of the omission or misstatement judged in the surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a combination of both, could be the determining factor’
Practice Statement 2 – Making Materiality Judgements : General characteristics of materiality 2
Materiality judgements are pervasive :
Materiality judgements are pervasive to the preparation of financial statements. Entities make materiality judgements in decisions about recognition and measurement as well as presentation and disclosure. Requirements in IFRS only need to be applied
if their effect is material to the complete set of financial statements. However, it is inappropriate to make, or leave uncorrected, immaterial departures from IFRS to
achieve a particular presentation.
The Practice Statement reiterates that an entity does not need to provide a disclosure specified by IFRS if
the information resulting from that disclosure is not material, even if IFRS contains a list of specific disclosure requirements or describes them as minimum requirements.
Materiality judgements are pervasive :
Materiality judgements are pervasive to the preparation of financial statements. Entities make materiality judgements in decisions about recognition and measurement as well as presentation and disclosure. Requirements in IFRS only need to be applied
if their effect is material to the complete set of financial statements. However, it is inappropriate to make, or leave uncorrected, immaterial departures from IFRS to
achieve a particular presentation.
The Practice Statement reiterates that an entity does not need to provide a disclosure specified by IFRS if
the information resulting from that disclosure is not material, even if IFRS contains a list of specific disclosure requirements or describes them as minimum requirements.