6. Basic Memory Systems: Short-Term Flashcards
modal model of memory
- multiple sensory registers (auditory, visual, haptic)
- short term store for rehearsal
- long-term store that associates information
- model has been shown to be problematic, but it’s simplicity helps communicate basic findings of memory research
modal model of memory: flow chart
env. sitmulus
sensory memory
STM
LTM
refer to notebook page 34
sensory memory (vision)
has bee postulated to have (traditionally) iconic memory (infinite memory)
1. large capacity
2. short duration (250ms)
3. non-interpretable representations (rapid decay)
memory is a reconstruction
visual persistence
- “after images” = straightforward way to understand sensory memory for visual info
- neurons continue to be active AFTER events have ceased to occur in outside world
- continued activation = memory
full-report paradigm
- if sensory info is only available for a brief period, how can we measure it? make it about sensation, but not perception
- found that nb of recalled letters (immediate memory span) is constant for each participant
- qty of info initially acquired cannot be asses because the nb of letters presented exceeds capacity of immediate memory span
What is the benefit of having less Qs on a test, regarding STM
when we increase the nb of Qs, we increase the task difficulty by creating more inteference
partial report paradigm
goal: to determine if participants can register more info than they can recall using the full report procedure
- found that once experimental error has been considered, the results sow that all the briefly presented material is initially registered in memory
- thus, iconic memory has large info storage capacity
What does the partial report paradigm suggest when we are looking at an image briefly
suggests that EVERYTHING is encoded briefly, because we don’t know which row we will be asked to recall
duration of iconic memory
- in a follow up experiment, Sperling used a partial report paradigm
- refer to slides 21-25
- info remains in iconic memory for about 250ms
- pattern of activation becomes desynchronized
issues with the partial report
- if we have access to categorical info, what might we predict would happen with recall performance
- if performance in categorical partial report is better than full report, then iconinc mental representations are interpreted
- if performance in catgeorial partial report is the same as full report, then inconic mental representations are NOT interpreted
categorical partial report
refer to slides 28-29
role of uncertainty
- full report = easier than partial report
- refer to small diagram on page 35 of notebook
delayed recall paradigm
- refer to slides 31-32
- when task difficult is equated across conditions, categorical partial report is better than full report
- some categorical info appears to be available
iconic memory conclusions
- empirical phenomenon = robust
- visible persistence is not informational persistence
- no evidence for a unitary sensory register
- visual persistence might reflect enduring stimulus-related activity in the visual cortex
working memory characteristics
- short term limited store that maintains info until it is required or decays
- capacity is estimated at 4 items
- refer to diagram on page 35 of notebook