1. Inferences of Cognition Flashcards
makings of inference
- accuracy
- conjoint measures
- RT
- subjective assessments of performance
PUTTING IT TOGETHER
methods of psychological science
goal:
- gain understanding of the world by using method, evidence and theory
when we manipulate something and see systematic variations in a dependent measure we can use this to infer what foes in term of cognitive operations
the factory analogy
- we try to figure out the machinery inside - reverse engineering
- use the input and output of a system to infer what processes are occurring
- predictions can be made as to the output on future occasions
- Q: patterns of error are studied - how do people make mistakes? A: an intrusion error may result from a mixup of elements still in working memory
response time
- creation of a product takes time
1. nb of steps that are taken
2. resources available at each step - time taken from the end of the presentation of a Q or tasks to the responses
- impacts on RT
1. more operations = higher RT (complexity)
2. less resources = higher RT
3. more chunking = less RT (can categorize)
4. if something is novel = higher R
multitasking
is possible if we are very used to at least one of the tasks
- e.g. driving while singing the lyrics to a song
accuracy
- nature of cogntive processes after having having been inferred from a successful completion of a task
- more accurate in a task leads to less inference is assumed to be present and/or the more resources are available
- e.g. consider a case where we want to understand the relationship between Q format and studied topic
speed-accuracy tradeoff
when ACC and RT are positively related
what is the demise of introspection?
frequently overexaggerated
metacognitive assessments of performance consist of…
variety of self-report techniques
subjective reports (refer to slides 16-34 of powerpoint for examples)
- verbal reports
- participants are asked to report strategies used to complete a task, descriptions of rules (e.g. how you categorize stimuli)
subjective - subjective probability assessments
participants assign a subjective probability to the occurrence of an event (e.g. what is the chance it will rain?)
metacognition
- we know that subjective reports are less than accurate, so inferences can be made about how people are
- want to observe systematic deviations between subjective reports and objective measures
- e.g. if we are underconfident, we are not aware of information used to successfully complete the task, which implies that unconscious processes drive our success
What general processes are involved in perceiving a stimuli and reporting confidence?
refer to page 6 of notebook
confidence
knowledge I know vs knowledge I think i know
ecological approach
- setting reflects the condition of the real
ecological approach: affordances
potential functions/uses of stimuli in the real world