4 Flashcards
According to___, human acts are moral acts because they express and determine the goodness or evil of the individual who performs them.
St. Thomas Aquinas
The\ is defined by the relationship of man’s freedom with the authentic good.
morality of acts
_____is defined by the relationship of man’s freedom with the authentic good.
Hence,____ is morally good when the choices of freedom are in conformity with man’s true good and thus express the voluntary ordering of the person towards his or her ultimate end: God himself,
morality of acts
acting
the supreme good in whom man finds his full and perfect happiness.110
God himself
When he/she acts deliberately, he or she, so to speak, is the____ of his or her acts.
father
acts that are freely chosen in consequences of a judgment of conscience, can be morally evaluated.
They are either good or evil.
Human acts
The morality of human acts depends on:
1) the object chosen
2) the end in view or the intention
3) the circumstances of the action
is a good toward which the will deliberately directs itself.
It is the matter of a human act.
object chosen
morally specifies the act of the will, insofar as reason recognizes and judges it to be or not to be in conformity with the true good.
The object chosen
resides in the acting subject. Because it lies at the voluntary source of an action and determines it by its end
intention
is an element essential to the moral evaluation of an action.
The end is the first goal of the___ and indicates the purpose pursued in the action.
intention
intention
is a movement of the will toward the end: it is concerned with the goal of the activity.
It aims at the good anticipated from the action undertaken.
It is not limited to directing individual actions, but can guide several actions toward one and the same purpose;
it can orient one’s whole life towards its ultimate end.
intention
For example, a service done with the end of helping one’s neighbor can at the same time be inspired by the love of God as the ultimate end of all our actions.
On and the same action can also be inspired by several intentions, such as performing a service in order to obtain a favor or to boast about it
Intention
does not make behavior that is intrinsically disordered, such lying and calumny, good or just.
The end does not justify the means.
Thus the condemnation of an innocent person cannot be justified as a legitimate means of saving the nation.
A good intention
(such as vainglory) makes an act evil that, in an of itself, can be good (such as almsgiving)
bad intention
______including the consequences, are secondary elements of a moral act.
They contribute to increasing or diminishing the moral goodness or evil of human acts (for example, the amount of a theft).
They can also diminish or increase the agent’s responsibility (such as acting out of a fear of death).
circumstances
______of themselves cannot change the moral quality of acts themselves, they can make neither good nor right an action that is in itself evil
Circumstances
It is therefore an error to judge the morality of human act by considering only the_____ that inspires them or the——— (environment, social pressure, duress or emergency, etc.) which supply their context.
intention
circumstances
otherwise known as Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006, amending Article 12, paragraph 3 of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines,
Section 6 of Republic Act No. 9344
A child above___years but below _____years of age shall likewise be exempt from criminal liability and be subjected to an intervention program, unless he/she has acted with discernment, in which case, such child shall be subjected to the appropriate proceedings in accordance with this Act.
fifteen (15)
eighteen (18)
The____, in an en banc resolution, defines____ as the capacity of the child at the time of the commission of the offense to understand the differences between right and wrong and the consequences of the wrongful act.
This means that _____ refers to the mental capacity of the child to understand the difference between right and [wrong of the act and its consequences.
Supreme Court
discernment
as the mental capacity to fully appreciate the consequences of one’s unlawful acts, or to determine the difference between right and wrong.
This may be shown and should be determined by considering all the circumstances afforded by the record of the case, his appearance, his attitude and his behavior and conduct, not only before and during the commission of the act but also after and even during the trial.
discernment