2nd Year: Commissioning and General Machine/TPS Knowledge Flashcards
If you take a PDD curve, and the curve is parallel but offset to what gold beam data expects, is this an issue with the Linac? Why or why not?
Most likely not
If energy/beam quality differs, the curve will be skewed in a non-parallel manner (attenuation differences)
If it just appears offset, you most likely just have a bad setup on measurement
If energy of a flattened beam is higher than expected, what happens to the horns?
Horns increase
What beam characteristic is generally the best distinguisher of beam energy?
Flatness (for flattened beams)
Ex. for a 6M beam, a 1% error in energy presents as a 4% error in profile
List some equipment that is required for acquisition of commissioning data
3D Water Tank with large enough dimensions for full scatter
Ion chamber for TG-51
Small field detector
Scanning chambers/detectors
Levels for the tank and gantry head
For water tank scanning, how is a CAX correction applied? How is it measured?
Measured using geometry that extracts inplane offset, crossplane offset and angles based off in-plane and crossplane profiles at 2 or 3 different depths
Translational corrections can be applied to all data collected therafter, but rotational corrections cannot be.
For large fields, not applying rotational corrections does not make a big difference. For small fields, it does so you want rotational CAX measurement to be as close to 0 as possible
For tanks that are unable to measure inplane, crossplane and diagonal profiles for the largest field sizes, what method is used to do this?
Shifted tank method
Center field at a quadrant of the tank, with approx 5 cm from any tank border from crosshair and measure only towards center of tank
With this method you are measuring half the profile, which is fine because in TPS you would just mirror the profile anyway
Why for commissioning do we do 10 x 10 PDD profiles for FFF beams with and without the lead foil?
TG-51 requires it with the lead foil
TPS requires it WITHOUT the lead foil. Which makes complete sense as you never treat a patient with lead foil
At what depths does Eclipse TPS want inplane and crossplane profiles for photons?
max, 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, 30 cm
How do you measure Sp?
You don’t
You measure Scp in a water tank
You measure Sc in air
You then divide Scp/Sc for all respective field sizes to get Sp
How is DLG measured?
Varian created template plan where there’s small slit of opening with MLCs that slides across the field with varying gap sizes
Detector measures integrated dose for each slit size plans
Create a plot of integrated dose vs gap size
Extrapolate down to a gap of 0 mm and that gives you your DLG
What is the difference between inplane and crossplane?
Inplane is along the axis of the linac (LNG)
Crossplane is perpendicular to the axis of the LINAC (LAT)
Why are you allowed during commissioning to assume perfect symmetry of your profiles?
Because you normally check ahead of time during acceptance testing
Afterwards, during all your QA, you ensure symmetry is close to perfect
What is the most ideal small field dosimeter for scanning? What about output factors?
Scanning: diode detector such as Edge or MicroDiamond
OF: W1 or W2
Note: Although W2 has scanning capabilities, it’s not too great. Software kinda stinks. Also scanning requires high doses, and this over time causes plastic yellowing throughout course of commissioning
What criteria is used to compare measured profiles to VRB data?
2% / 2mm gamma analysis for inplane, crossplane and PDD
3% / 3 mm gamma analysis for diagonals
Where does the VRB data come from?
Real measured data which is a composite of multiple sets of data measured across multiple varian truebeams at Duke, with different physicists
What does VRB stand for?
Varian Reference Beam
How is VRB used during commissioning?
Two approaches based off the client
- VRB is used in the TPS to make models, and all commissioning measurements are used to validate the VRB
- The measured data is used in TPS to create the models and are double checked with VRB
In both cases, you need to ensure VRB data is close to measured data anyway. It’s then just a matter of which data do you want to use for your model? Which do you trust more?
How is data processed for PDD curves?
- Shift
- Smooth
- Normalize
- For electrons, software should have a depth dependent PDI to PDD correction for chamber
How is data processed for inplane and cross plan measurements?
Smooth
CAX correction
Make symmetric
The microdiamond and edge detectors are both diode detectors. What is the main compositional difference between them though?
Microdiamond is artifical diamong with a very small dye and is near tissue equivalent
Edge is silicon
Down to what field size is PDD data measured?
1 x 1 cm2
What field sizes are MLC and Jaw collimated small field profiles taken for in plane, crossplane and PDD curves?
1x1 –> 3x3 cm2 for PDD
2x2 and 3x3 for all profiles and PDDs
Down to what field size does eclipse accept in and crossplane data?
3x3 cm2
Anything below will not be accepted by Eclipse
Why for small field PDD can you feel confident measuring directly and not needing a per depth correction factor?
Although best practice is to do a per depth correction, it is deemed non-essential by commissioning standards, as the actual energy spectrum, and thus perturbation correction factor barely changes vs depth. Most commissioning don’t apply any factors for scans, only point measurements
This is due to field spreading increasing low energy scatter, while beam hardening increases energy, thus resulting in a somewhat balance. The factors will change, but not by a significant amount
For a output factor corrected reading at an intermediate field, how do you find output factor for fields smaller than the intermediate field using daisy chaining?
Measure response at the intermediate field
This gives you a dose/response
Then field response at smaller fields
Multiply responses by correction factor to go from small field to intermediate field and multiply by dose/response of intermediate field
How are small field scatter factors normalized to a 10x10 field?
Two steps,
First the corrected scatter factor is normalized to intermediate field, then normalized to 10x10
That is, daisy chaining
True or False
Varian machines tend to behave very closely to their pre-calculated VRB?
True!
True or False
Elekta machines tend to act very closely to their representative data?
False
For vendors besides Varian, there is no representative data. All models must be based off user collected data.
Assuming you use VRB data to create TPS model, how do you perform validation during commissioning?
You can do it as you take the real data (this is most efficient)
Generate plans in liquid water with the exact same setup as the measurements you’re taking, then you can do either a point by point or gamma analysis comparison between the two
In addition you will need to generate series of test plans for delivery of course
Assuming you didn’t want to use VRB data for your TPS models, how does validation work?
You cannot validate data as you collect it. Meaning you must collect everything first, enter into TPS, generate models, then create plans to compare to the measured profiles
What critieria is needed for two linacs to be “matched”
Energy is exactly equal
MLCs are the same
DLG and transmission factors are the same
**Note: **There is a tuning factor that allows you to have the same DLG. But that doesn’t exist for transmission facotrs
How is transmission factor measured?
100 SAD, 5 cm depth
10x10 cm2 measurement first
Take a measurement with MLC bank A covering field
Then another with MLC bank B covering
Transmission factor is average of A and B covering divided by open field
For small fields, why should you NOT measure PDD? Only TMR
It’s very difficult to measure PDD due to chamber movement from CAX as the chamber changes depth. Your alignment is critical and has to be centered perfectly the entire range of depths
For TMR, since the chamber only stays in one spot, it only needs to be aligned once
If you are gonna measure PDD, you better make sure your chamber alignment is excellent at all depths
What data must be measured during commissioning for CDC/ECDC?
10 x 10 cm2 open field absolute dosimetry
Output factor for all cones (95 SSD, 5 cm depth)
TMR for at least three cones
OAR for at least three cones measured at ATLEAST one SSD and one depth
What data did we collect for commissioning of CDC and ECDC?
Profiles at 80, 90, 100 SSD for every cone at d = 5 cm
TMR at STD = 100 for all cones
Output factor for each cone at 95 SSD, 5 cm depth for all cones, 5x5 cm2 jaws
Which detectors did we use for cone commissioning?
Edge and W1
They were compared to one another, and W1 was compared to MC
In addition to data collection for TPS, what else is done for Cone Commissioning?
- E2E test
- Comparison of data vs golden beam provided by varian for 5x5 cm2 jaw setting
- Winston-Lutz isocentricity test
- Center check output factor
- Cone Jaw setting check
- Cone concentricity
When commissioning your 3D tank for scans, what are 4 things you must measure/determine extent of?
Alignment
Orthogonality
Distance Accuracy
Hysteresis effects
For small fields, where you want to measure TMR but can’t, how do you convert from PDD to TMR?
British journal of radiology 25 is a supplement that explains the conversion
True or False
Sc and Sp data are never actually used by the TPS
True
You do not input this data into the TPS. It is purely for your own databook in case someone wants to do a hand calc
They contribute nothing to the models
The output factor tables already include all scatter info and the TPS can just derive a model from that
What are some tests used to commission RapidArc?
Plans with slits at various gantry angles to test affect of gravity on MLCs
PF at cardinal angles
PF during rapid arc delivery (gantry rotation affect vs MLC positioning)
Intentional PF error during rapid arc and ability of system to detect
Dose rate and gantry speed control (deliver same dose with 7 different dose rates and gantry speeds)
DMLC dosimetry with MLC slit at 4 different angles
Briefly, how is portal dosimetry commissioned?
PVA calibration all scans
During PVA calibration MV dosimetry mode, deliver the beam, normalize response across all sub imagers in panel array, then upload the beam data for your TPS model and specify dose at CAX
This will tell the panel exactly what dose was delivered to each point and it gives it a reference to calibrate all it’s sub arrays to
Repeat for all energies
Run series of test plans (3D, IMRT, chair) to validate
What does the chair sample plan test? (3 major components of IMRT)
- Inverse planning module
- Leaf motion calculator
- Dynamic MLC control
How does your TPS create its model given input dataset?
It’s essentially an optimization process
The model tweaks its parameters and optimizes to to try best match input data
What is the photon source size for the linac?
It is not one singular value, source size is defined by the algorithm, NOT physical size, and depends on if you collimate MLC or Jaws
For AAA: x source size is 1 mm and y is 0 for MLC. Both are 0 for jaw
For acuros: x source size is 1.5 mm and y is 0. Both are 0 for jaw
Both models just need to use those values for their calcs, taking into account MLC or jaw transmissions in either direction
Per TG-106, where should physical wedge factors be measured?
100 SSD at dmax
Per TG 106 where should scatter factors be measured?
100 SSD
either at dmax or 10 cm depth
Per TG-106, where are cone output factors defined?
100 SSD, dmax