2/21 JDR Flashcards
Describe the study on machine learning and 3rd molar assessment
Carvalho et al JDR
Used AI to detect and classify 3rd molar proximity to the IAN nerve in panoramic radiographs.
4,516 panos used to train the machine learning device.
Classifications:
*3rd molar root development: Undeveloped, fully developed, or uncertain development
* IAN proximity: No superimposition, superimposition <50%, or superimposition >50%
120 panos were then processed through AI.
3 different AI models were used for 3rd molar detection:
* YOLOv5
* SDU-Net = had best performance (97.7% accuracy)
* U-Net
2 different AI models were used for IAN superimposition and root development:
* ResNet-101 = best performance (~94% for both)
* Vit-B
Describe the study on how smoking exposure affects nonsurgical periodontal therapy - 1 year followup
Leite et al JDR
80 patients
* Exam, then SRP followed by perio maintenances every 3 months
* “Most” patients were Stage III Grade B
Compared light smokers / quitters, moderate smokers, and heavy smokers. (Couldn’t find in the article their definition for these terms)
RESULTS:
*Heavy smokers (overall?) had 10 more sites with ≥8mm CAL loss, compared with the light smokers
* The heavy smokers had only 50% reduction of # of sites, compared with the light smokers.
* Non-surgical therapy had no effect on heavy smoker severe periodontitis patients, compared with the light and moderate smokers.
NOTE: Somewhat poor study design and lack of clarity
Describe the study on identifying dental implant systems using a large-scale multicenter data set.
Park et al JDR
Used the ResNet-50 AI system to identify dental implants in xrays.
Data set:
* 37,442 Periapical xrays and 113,291 panoramics.
* There were 25 different dental implant systems.
120,585 were used for training, 15,074 for validation, and the AI was tested on 15,074 xrays.
RESULTS:
The ResNet-50 AI was much more accurate than dental professionals at identifying implants:
* AI: 82% accurate
* Dental professionals: 24%
AI was also much faster and saved more than 81 minutes of time. (To read 200 xrays: AI: 4.5 minutes; Dental professionals: 91.3 minutes)
Describe how TAM receptors are therapeutic targets in bone regeneration.
Decker et al JDR
Mouse study involving extraction and daily treatment with RXDX-106 (a TAM inhibitor). Histology at 7 days
Results:
* TAM inhibition doesn’t change immune dynamics after extraction.
* TAM inhibition accelerated alveolar bone healing by promoting osteogenic differentiation of alveolar bone mesenchymal stem cells. = 4X increase in activity.
Describe the study on the efficacy of mouthwash containing CHX and CPC in Covid-19 positive patients.
Bonn et al JDR
61 COVID-positive patients total. Oropharyngeal samples were collected before, and 30 minutes after the rinse.
* Test group: rinse with CHX and CPC
* Control group: Placebo rinse
RESULTS:
* Viral load decreased in both groups after the mouthwash.
* Viral infectivity significantly decreased in the test group.
* SSD in viral infectivity was found in patients who had 3 vaccine shots, compared with 2 shots.
Describe the study on clinical and radiographic outcomes of short (6mm) versus long (10mm) implants after 10 years of loading.
Sahrmann et al JDR
Radiographic study
- Short (6mm) implant survival: 86%
- Long (10mm) implant survival: 97%
- Survival was NSSD
- NSSD Marginal bone loss