Week 6 Flashcards
learning
a relatively permanent change
adaptation
a transient change
2 types of test learning can be evaluated
- retention test
- transfer test
potential issues with learning a surgical skill in using a new method (virtual reality) and an old method (physical practice)
testing environment is familiar to one group but not the other
learning and performance variables
in retention and transfer tests we did not consider performance during acquisition at all
- changes in acquisition are NOT relatively permanent due to performance variables
performance variables definition
influence performance in transient ways
- the effect of the variable disappears when conditions are altered (intervention remvoed)
learning variables definition
influences performance in relatively permanent ways
- the effect of the variable stays when the conditions are altered
performance variables
feedback/tools that affect performance
learning variables
feedback and tools that lead to permanent changes
example of learning variables
- training wheels on a bike - when removed, the effect of the variable stays
- chair to hold postural support when skating
- feedback from a video tapes
well-practiced skills and assessing learning
for well-practiced skills it is hard to assess if additional practice will result in improvements
- ceiling effect
other ways of assessing learning
dual tasks to gauge is there is any improvements in learning
performance curves
indicated that skills can be learned using different patterns
overlearning
the process of having a person continue to practice after they have reached a performance ceiling
how would we measure if any more performance effects are happening during overlearning trials
- reach maximum score then keep going
- by computing a savings score
what can we do to assess the effect of overlearning?
calculate a savings score
savings score
how many trials the overlearning group saved in reaching their ceiling
what indicated overlearning?
more practice trials at ceiling
example of overlearning and ceiling effect
group A: 15 trials to reach ceiling
group B: 10 trials to reach ceiling
- therefore group B saved 5 trials relative to group A
other ways of assessing learning
- performance on a secondary task
- measuring indices of effort
- measuring response latency
- generalizability of learning
performance on a secondary task
gives us an idea of how much attention is needed to perform a task
- a well learned task requires less attention
measuring indices of effort
- physiological markers (learned task is to a greater extent)
- psychological markers
measuring response latency
speed of correct response or movement performance
generalizability of learning
varying the parameters of the task (linked to GMP)
the amount of learning
hard to quantify
- criterion that is used can affect the learning curve shapes
what is often used to quantify the rate of learning?
steepness of learning curves in acquisition period