Week 5 Flashcards
why can’t we tickle ourselves?
send efference copy down so you know what it is going to feel like (you predict what it is going to feel like)
what does the inclusion of the effector parameter indicate?
the muscles for a particular action could not be stored in a GMP
if the muscles for a particular action can’t be stored in a GMP, what is the sequence then?
the sequential ordering is thought to be abstract
what are added to the command during the preparation of the program?
the specific joints and muscles
- supported by bilateral-transfer
bilateral-transfer
transfer of practice effect to other limb
- refining motor program
inputs of GMP
- duration
- force
- effector
specification of motor program
- GMP (abstract, relative timing, relative force)
- GMP with inputs (parameterization)
- motor command
- specific muscle activation and efference released
how does the concept of the GMP address the storage and novelty problems?
- not able to store new information for motor outputs
- general set of programs that pre-exist in motor repertoire - don’t need to store specific programs =, just use same programs and specific effector
-specify force, duration and effector reduces storage problem
novelty
new movements aren’t truly new
- can adapt other programs to perform the action
how does concept of the GMP address the storage and novelty problem - computer analogy?
- one program needs to be stored for each class of problem
- a general program can be run on data it has never seen before
- just have to specify the proper parameters
2 hypotheses of infants and storage and novelty problem
- they come preprogrammed
- build on primitive sets of actions (reflexes)
when is there a relationship between speed and accuracy?
when examining voluntary, goal-directed movements
speed accuracy tradeoffs
- fast movements are less accurate
- accurate movements are now slower
what researcher explain the relationship of accuracy and speed for feedback-based movements?
paul fitts (1954)
fitt’s law
taps between 2 targets as rapidly as possible maintaining 95% accuracy
what does fitt’s law include
- movement time between 2 targets (MT=20s/#taps)
- movement amplitude (A)
- target width (W)
fitts paradigm
index of difficulty
index of difficulty (ID)
log2 (2(amplitude)/width)
what happens when you increase index of difficulty?
movement time increases
what is the main point of fitts law
as you increase ID, MT increases
is it more difficult is the targets are the same width and closer or further apart?
further apart
is it more difficult is the targets are the sample amplitude but one is smaller width then the other?
the one with smaller width is more difficult
fitts equation
MT = a + b * log2(2A/W)
MT= movement time
a= y-int
b= slope
*=multiplied
what is ID measurement
bits of information
what happens if movement amplitude is doubled?
ID increases by 1
what happens if the target width is doubled?
ID decreases by 1
how would you get an ID of 0?
if width was so big that the targets overlaps, there is no amplitude therefore ID=0
graphing Fitts data
strong positive linear relationship between MT and ID
what ID is the highest?
ID 3
- responds to easiest movements
what does fitts law holds for?
- children
- lower-limb movements
- under magnification
- imagined movements
- perceived movements
fitts law in open loop movements (schmidt)
- the width of the line did not change but distance (D) and time required to make the movement (T) did
what was the goal of fitts law in open loop movements?
determine the “spread” about the target as a function of D and T
- target size the participant was effectively using
schmidts law
movements with no vision
- as time increases, the effective target width increases
violation of fitts law
was found when contextual target cues were present
- participants prepare for “worst case scenario”
what causes the fitt’s law violation? (glazebrook, 2015)
- 3 far targets
- 3 middle targets
- 3 close targets
violations for all last targets? (glazebrook, 2015)
analyzed movement trajectories to the target
- if people planning for worst case to see big difference in the beginning
glazebrook et. al, 2015
- participants performed movements to a target location (first, middle or last)
- measured movement variability across the trajectory as an indicator of planning vs. online movement control
what do differences of variability earlier indicate? (glazebrook, 2015)
planning
what doe differences in variability later indicate? (glazebrook, 2015)
control
result of glazebrook, 2015
differences emerged later in the trajectory, meaning the violation could be based on more efficient movement corrections
do we plan for the worst case scenario?
NO - we adapt efficiently
what causes speed accuracy tradeoffs?
impulse-variability theory
impulse-variability theory
- the variability in the duration of a group of contraction is related to mean duration
- variability in force produced increases as function of the force produced