Week 5 - Goal Setting Flashcards
Define objective goals
focus on “attaining a specific standard of proficiency on a task, usually w/in a specified time”
(Locke & Latham, 2002)
Define subjective goals
General statements of intent (e.g., “I want to do well,” ) that aren’t measurable or objective.
What are the types of goals
Outcome
Performance
Process
TYPES OF GOALS
Describe outcome goals
focus on a competitive result of an event.
Achieving these goals doesn’t only depend on own efforts but also on ability + play of your opponent.
TYPES OF GOALS
Describe performance goals
Focus on achieving standards or perf. objectives independently of other competitors, usually on the basis of comparisons w/ own previous performances.
Tend to be more flexible + in your control.
Give examples of performance goals
Running a mile in 6 mins 21 secs
Improving the % of successful slice first serves from 70% to 80%
TYPES OF GOALS
Describe process goals
Focus on actions ind. must engage in during performance to execute or perform well.
Research by Kingston + Hardy (1997) has shown that process goals are effective in +ively influencing golfers’ self-efficacy, cognitive anxiety + confidence.
Give an example of a process goal
Athlete doing injury rehabilitation may set a goal of slowly moving through a range of motion while maintaining good form on a leg extension exercise.
How do outcome goals change behaviour?
Facilitate ST motivation away from comp
but just b4 or during comp it often ⬆️ anxiety + irrelevant, distracting thoughts.
Why are performance + process goals important?
Can make more precise adjustments
i.e ⬆️ goal from 80->82% than you can to outcome goals which often have fewer levels.
Also less dependent on opponents behaviour.
What can happen if too much emphasis is placed on a specific performance goal under special circumstances?
Can create anxiety.
Can also be difficult to prioritise specific performance + process goals unless they also consider LT outcome goals.
Who showed that using a mix of goal types produced significantly better performance than simply relying on 1
Study by Filby, Maynard, + Graydon (1999)
Who + what for:
Results = GS interventions effective in changing PA levels for a wide variety of populations (e.g., males + females, various ages) irrespective of mode of delivery (e.g., in person vs. via technology).
What else did they conclude?
McEwan + colleagues (2016) conducted a systematic review + meta-analysis of 45 GS–based interventions for changing PA behavior.
Also concluded that when GS interventions included planning, goal achievement strategies, rewards + fb, the PA change effects were maximized.
What factors consistently enhance the effectiveness of GS in sport environments?
ST + LT goals of mod. difficulty
Fb
Specificity
Public acknowledgment of goals
Combination of different goals.
On what type of tasks does GS appear to enhance performance best?
Low-complexity tasks