Week 5 Easements and Covenants Flashcards
Lot 1 and Lot 2 – initially A owns both lots. A lives on lot one and A decides to transfer lot 2 to B.
when A transfer’s lot 2 to B A says, “B I want you to only use this property for single family residential purposes only.”
While A is willing to no longer be the owner of lot 2 A is living there. A wants those who are on lot 2 to also use it as a residence because no one wants to live by a factory.
Single Family Residential only it can be used in very ugly ways.
Specifically, as methods of racial, ethnic and socioeconomic discrimination. Assume that A doesn’t want to live by a factory.
This agreement between A and B that lot 2 is only going to be used single family residential only is perfectly fine.
What will happen that will complicate things is that B will transfer Lot 2 to C and A will transfer lot 1 in some or fashion to D and then C is going to open a factory.
Now D is mad because D is living next to a factory.
Real covenants and equitable servitudes. Idea is when can D sue C fand get money damages for the fact that C has opened a factory in violation of a real covenant?
Or Equitable Servitude standpoint when can D sue C to get an injunction to shut the factory down?
!!
!!
Real Covenant (Money Damages)
how many elements do you have to prove?
5
Essay with this sort of analysis DO _____ ___________ FIRST. Harder and more points there and by the time you get to equitable servitudes you will know if they have been met or not because the elements are the same.
REAL COVENANTS
Real covenants require _______.
Equitable servitudes don’t as a general rule.
privity
You can say Written, Notice, Intent, Touch and Concern all met please see above. Yes they can get an injunction. Easy to do because analysis has been done in real covenant discussion. !!
!!
Lot 1 and Lot 2 – initially A owns both lots. A lives on lot one and A decides to transfer lot 2 to B.
when A transfer’s lot 2 to B A says, “B I want you to only use this property for single family residential purposes only.”
Lot 2 is the _________ side. _______ because you can only use it as a residence. Single family residential only. Can’t use it however you want that is why lot 2 is _________.
Lot 1 is _________ because it knows that it will be next to a single-family residential only parcel.
burdened
burdened
burdened
benefited
DON’T GET BENEFIT AND BURDEN CONFUSED. Test for vertical privity on the benefited side and a test for vertical privity on the burdened side. !!
!!
If A has the ability, if we can prove all of the elements for real covenants and equitable servitudes, A has the ability to force C to shut down the factory or to pay A money for breach of the covenant.
Worst case – we have D down here. Sometimes it is just A suing C.
!!
!!
________ _________ is something you would have to show between A and D and something you would have to show between B and C. test for vertical privity being established is different on each side.
Vertical Privity
In order for VP to run between B and C they have to satisfy the “_____ _______”
same test
______ ______ means that B has to give the same estate in land that B has to C.
If B owns FSA B should sell to C with FSA.
IF B is renting from A. What sort of transfer to C would transfer the rest of B’s rights– Assignment would transfer the rest of B’s rights.
same test
Benefit side for the benefit to run from A to D – vertical privity must exist, and the “____ ____” must be met.
some test
A has to give some of A’s rights to D. Not all but some.
Could A rent to D? Yes, Could A give D a life estate? Yes.
Could A sell to D in FSA? Yes, because the test for Vertical Privity on the benefit side simply says that A has to give ____ or ____but at least some of A’s rights to D.
some or all
For D to be able to sue C because C opened a factory, we have to be able to prove ______ ________ on both sides the benefit side and the burdened side.
vertical privity
Privity between A and B. If A and B don’t have ______ _______ than D cannot sue C and get money damages because we won’t meet the elements for a real covenant
horizontal privity