Week 3 - LL/T Flashcards

1
Q

Tenant’s rights: condition of premises fails to meet min. standards
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A
  1. Quiet Enjoyment and Constructive Eviction
  2. The Illegal Lease
  3. The implied warranty of habitability
  4. Retaliatory Eviction
  5. Landlord’s Tort Liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tenant’s rights: condition of premises fails to meet min. standards
1. ?
2.
3.
4.
5.

A
  1. Quiet Enjoyment and Constructive Eviction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Tenant’s rights: condition of premises fails to meet min. standards
1.
2. ?
3.
4.
5.

A
  1. The Illegal Lease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tenant’s rights: condition of premises fails to meet min. standards
1.
2.
3. ?
4.
5.

A
  1. The implied warranty of habitability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tenant’s rights: condition of premises fails to meet min. standards
1.
2.
3.
4. ?
5.

A
  1. Retaliatory Eviction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tenant’s rights: condition of premises fails to meet min. standards
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. ?

A
  1. Landlord’s Tort Liability

Tenant’s duties: landlord’s rights and remedies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

TEST: Figure out when a tenant can claim one of the things listed on the slide and what they would have to prove to win and which is the best one for the tenant to use in which situations.

A

!!!!!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

_______ _____ was limited to cases in which the T was actually ousted physically (early common law imposed no duty on L to provide suitable premises).

  • No mutuality of obligations (unlike contract law).
  • Lessee beware
A

common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Common law was limited to cases in which the T was actually ______ ________(early common law imposed no duty on L to provide _______ _______.

A

ousted physically

suitable premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

LL was not responsible for providing suitable premises to the tenant at _____ _____.

A

common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

We are thinking well the LL has a duty to provide me a heated apartment, with electricity, doors that lock, free of mice, basic things that we think of and in turn I will pay rent but there didn’t use to be mutuality of obligations and we were dealing with lessee beware or caveat lessee.

What does this refer to?

A

No mutuality of obligations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Covenant of quiet enjoyment was an _________.

A

exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

This exception to the general rule of ‘no mutuality of obligations’ was the vehicle for developing the law that moved the pendulum of rights in favor of the __________.

A

tenant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The obligation to pay rent was dependent upon the ___________ being provided with possession physically undisturbed by the landlord (or L’s agent).

A

tenant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In order to claim a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, Tenant must be physically evicted from the premises by the Landlord.
A. True
B. False

A

In the modern era it is false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Historically the LL had to _________ remove you.

A

physically

17
Q

______________ _________ is linked to the covenant of quiet enjoyment and T doesn’t have to be physically evicted from the premises by the LL.

A

constructive eviction

18
Q

If the actions or inactions attributable to the landlord result in a breach of the lease causing the condition of the premises to be substantially unsuitable for purposes of the lease, or to be a serious interference with the beneficial enjoyment of the premises.

A

Constructive Eviction

19
Q

Constructive Eviction: if the actions or inactions attributable to the landlord result in a ______ of the _______ causing the condition of the premises to be _______ _________ for purposes of the lease, or to be a serious interference with the beneficial enjoyment of the premises.

A

breach of the lease

substantially unsuitable

20
Q

If the actions or inactions attributable to the landlord result in a breach of the lease causing the condition of the premises to be substantially unsuitable for purposes of the lease, or to be a serious interference with the beneficial enjoyment of the premises.

While this may not be “actual” eviction, the courts held that it could be a “_________” eviction (if other requirements are met).

A

constructive

21
Q

Once constructively evicted you are not responsible for any more ________.

A

rent

22
Q

________ _______ doesn’t mean the LL physically removes you from the property. It means that things got so bad while you were renting there that you physically removed yourself because the LL breached _____ ________. Once you have been constructively evicted, you are not responsible for paying rent anymore.

A

constructive eviction

quiet enjoyment

23
Q

Let’s talk about the necessary lead-up. Can you just wake up one day and say my LL is such a jerk, I declare myself constructively evicted?

A

NO there is process.

24
Q

Constructive Eviction: Additional Requirements:
1. ?
2.

A
  1. Provide the landlord with notice of the breach, and afford the landlord a reasonable opportunity to cure; and then,
25
Q

Constructive Eviction: Additional Requirements:
1.
2. ?

A
  1. The tenant cannot be “evicted” unless he or she leaves, therefore, the tenant must vacate within a reasonable time after the right comes into existence.
26
Q

Constructive Eviction: Additional Requirements:
1.
2.

A
  1. Provide the landlord with notice of the breach, and afford the landlord a reasonable opportunity to cure; and then,
  2. The tenant cannot be “evicted” unless he or she leaves, therefore, the tenant must vacate within a reasonable time after the right comes into existence.
27
Q

If you are saying LL there are rats in my apartment this is unacceptable – you have to notify the LL and you have to give them a chance to call the exterminator and for the exterminator to come. You can’t just say I am moving out. You have to give them a chance to fix it. You have to actually leave within a reasonable time. !!!

A

!!!

28
Q

What does “caveat lessee” mean?

A

Renter beware.

29
Q

Where there is a covenant of quiet enjoyment, either express or implied, and it is breached substantially by the LL, Courts have applied _______ ________as the remedy for the T.

A

constructive eviction

30
Q

Where there is a covenant of quiet enjoyment, either express or implied, and it is breached substantially by the LL, Courts have applied constructive eviction as the remedy for the T.

Thus, any act or omission which renders the premises ________ ________ for the purpose for which they are leased, or substantially interferes with the beneficial enjoyment of the premises, is a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment. T here was ________ _______and is not liable for the rent claimed.

A

substantially unsuitable

constructively evicted

31
Q

Remedy of constructive eviction relieves T of the harsh burden of ______ _______.

A

caveat lessee

32
Q

Constructive Eviction
What if the landlord’s breach of the lease (e.g., failure to carry out L’s duty to repair, as specified in the lease) does not result in conditions that rise to the level of “constructive eviction?”

Does the tenant have any remedy?

A

Example: newly divorced mom of a toddler. The big house on the multiple acres is harder to afford on one income. Moved into a townhouse. Townhouse had bedrooms upstairs. Spent most of time downstairs. 2 bathrooms upstairs and one downstairs. Potty training and I had to carry the kid to the upstairs bathroom.
Could I get mad and move out because it took them a week to fix the toilet – no even though long week.

No opportunity for me to move out and claim I was constructively evicted.

Most places the answer is no. the restatement says that there should be a right to apportionment. If that bathroom that I can’t use is 10% of the square footage, maybe I should pay 10% less rent but most jurisdictions do not agree.