week 5 Flashcards
power
- the capacity to determine the outcome of one’s own as well as others
structural power
- shapes how society operates and determining which groups of people have/lack access to resources, education, autonomy, jobs etc
- men hold more structural power, women sometimes have more dyadic power
dyadic power
- the capacity to choose intimate partners and relationships and to control the interactions and decisions that shape those relationships, including the distribution of emotional, social, and material resources within them.
- lower status and vulnerable women are at risk when men outnumber them
sex ratio theory
- ratio of men to women in a given environment influences the levels of dyadic power that the sexes hold
ways of exerting power (pratto and walker)
force
- the capacity to inflict physical or psychological harm
ways of exerting power (pratto and walker)
resource control
- controlling the creation/distribution of essential goods and services
ways of exerting power (pratto and walker)
cultural ideologies
- sets of beliefs and assumptions about groups that explain and justify unequal social hierarchies
androcentrism
- men and their experiences as universal
ethnocentrism
- tendency to view one’s own culture as universal
heterocentrism
- refers to the assumption that heterosexuality is the norm
stereotypes…
- legitimize/justify power held by men and ethnic dominants
- ethnic control of resources = ambitious instead of controlling/greedy
- agentic male stereotype, except from obligations towards others, justifies authority positions
privilege
- automated, unearned advantage associated with belonging to a dominant group
- absence of barriers/hardships
- dominant group may fail to notice these benefits
- white, male, heterosexual, cisgender, able bodied, christian, middle class
double jeopardy hypothesis
- individuals who belong to 2 or more subordinate groups will experience more discrimination than individuals who belong to just one subordinate group
intersectionality invisibility hypothesis
- experiences of people with multiple subordinate identities are sometimes ignored or disregarded
- vs experience of dominant group members are considered the cultural default
ambivalent sexism
hostile sexism
- justifies men’s dominance over women by portraying women as inferior to men
- antagonistic and derogatory beliefs
ambivalent sexism
benevolent sexism
- “positive” beliefs portraying women as wonderful, pure, worthy of protection
- patronizing nature, unrecognized form of gender bias
harmfulness of benevolent sexism
- pacifying effect on women, suppressing fight against unfair treatment
- less sympathy, more controlling
- perpetuation of rape culture
sexual objectificaton
- reduces women/girls to mere objects/sexual attributes
- subjecting them to use, manipulation, control
self-objectification
- internalizing and fixating on a perspective of oneself dominated by appearance
- treating oneself as a sexual object
- women do this more when exposed to benevolent/complementary sexual stereotypes
ambivalent attitudes towards men
- people hold ambivalent attitudes towards men that mirror their attitudes towards women
- hostile: resentment towards men viewed as arrogant, power hungry, sexual predatory
- benevolent: positive attitudes about men’s role as protectors and providers, should be cared for domestically by women
social dominance theory (SDO)
- extent to which people believe that social groups should be equal vs hierarchal
- high SDO = believe inequality is right and fair
- high among dominant groups, protects their own interest
- positive associations between high SDO, sexism, racism
system justification theory
- subordinate group members endorse more favourable stereotypes about the dominant group than their own group
- unfairness feeling insecure, motivated to justify the system they are in
gender discrimination
- unjust treatment based solely on one’s sex, sexual orientation or gender identity
microagressions
- everyday insults directed towards members of subordinate social groups
confronting prejudiced response model
attributional ambiguity
- difficulty people have in attributing negative treatment to discrimination when other possible explanations are present
confronting prejudiced response model
personal group discrimination discrepancy
- members of social groups may perceive that discrimination occurs more often towards their social group in general than it occurs to them personally
affirmative action
- efforts to combat discrimination by increasing opportunities for protected groups