Week 4 Flashcards
Individual vs. collective (social constructivist) meaning creation examples
Individual: Tuan, Hidalgo and Hernandez
Collective: Castells, Giddens,
“Identity creation is attempt to make sense of the world” Who said this?
Sum&Jessop
Temporal Context
Meaning creation is dynamic because the world is dynamic due to globalization. Can live in one place for one year or 20 years the meaning to you will be different
Spatial context
Meaning is created within a physical space
Social context
Meaning is created with the social relationships people have
Conscious and subconscious identity creation (Castells)
Conscious would be going to a yoga retreat on purpose
unconscious e.g. just not feeling at home somewhere.
Gibbons:
Interactions with elements of world outside self is necessary to create meaning
social and spatial relations interact. e.g. NL more private than the US
Lyotoard
The end of the great narratives. Not born into one ‘caste’ nowadays. Related to Giddens
Giddens
Self reflexivity - meaning creation is reflexive - we mould it. There are way more possibilities today to mould your own meaning. It commonly refers to the capacity of an agent to recognize forces of socialization and alter their place in the social structure.
Low or high reflexivity: shaped a lot by society and environment or not a lot
Gieryn 2000
Space is what places become when the unique gathering of things, meanings and values are sucked out.
There is no scale of place that has more meaning. e.g. nation not more than region
Tuan
meanings change according to scale of place.
Experiential perspective: experience moulds sense of place
Modes of place: places are more tangible at lower scales while regions and nation-states are mostly symbolical as places: they are too large to know directly on a daily basis – dependent on processes of signification
Hay
transient people like tourists don’t develop as much place attachment (individualistic sense of place view also example of it)
Stedman: Three general stances on places
- Direct effect model - essence of place is imbued in that place (genus loci)
- Meaning mediated model - meanings are based on environmental attributes. Physical setting provides limits upon which meaning is created
- Experiential model - experiences with landscape influence identity What is the difference between these two?. Basically saying place doesn’t matter for identity
Genius loci
idea that you could describe a place and capture its essence
Isachenko: Multilayered cultural landscapes
The top four are the range of mental layers and more subjective processes of a landscape.