Week 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Neo endogenous development (Bosworth)

A

development has to be mix of local and outsider forces for development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does neo-endogenous development depend on?

A

Local knowledge
local resources,
engagement of locals,
intermediaries to bridge internal and external,
adaptation – stops lock in because of bridge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Growth vs. Development (Mehmet)

A

Growth: Making things bigger - quantitative
Development: quantitative and qualitative. well being, social transformation etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Traditional location factors for industry development (5 points)

A
  1. labor supply
  2. market access
  3. access to resources
  4. transportation
  5. infrastructure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Institutional turn

A
  1. Economy not just about traditional factors of industry development
  2. informal connections. Trust, expectations, shared responses between businesses, networks.
  3. started in 1990s
  4. shared responses to threats
  5. globally local: using local space to remain/become globally competitive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CF: Cohesion Fund

A

—> Aimed at EU member states whose gross national income is less than 90% of EU average. Aims to reduce social and economic disparities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ERDF - European regional development fund

A

Vertical cooperation between scales of government
Horizontal cooperation between state and non-state actors
Predominant ERDF and CF expenditures: Infrastructure, human resources, productive environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Institutional Thickness: 4 points

A
  1. Strong organisational presence
  2. High level of interaction between organizations
  3. Coalition to coordinate effectively
  4. Shared norms and values
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Government: s

A

Traditional way of hierarchical policy making by formal organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Governance

A

: Networked cooperation between gov and non-gov organizations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Multi-level governance:

A

power is spread vertically between many levels of government and horizontally across multiple quasi-government and non-governmental organizations and actors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Vertical cooperation definition

A

producers at different levels of supply chain - e.g. toothbrush bristle and toothbrush handle — so they can cooperate together, usually less competitive since they have different production niches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

horizontal cooperation.

A

same level of the supply chain. usually competitors but can cooperate e.g. making toothbrush bristles. They can create strategic alliances, or support community interests together —> e.g. food industry working together to stop ampelbezeichnung on packaging even though they are competitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

CLLD community led local development (previously LEADER) 7 key features:

A
  1. Area based development
  2. Bottom up
  3. Public -private partnerships (local action groups)
  4. Multi-sectoral actions
  5. Innovation
  6. Cooperation
  7. Networking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

4 Challenged of neo-endogenous development

A

(Parra): Territorial mosaic can occur. Lack of management, disagreements in areas, and also local response and protest, e.g. about the development of a tourism resort
Bosworth: says this can occur due to difference between gov boundaries and locally identified spaces
2. Uncritical adoption: no consensus on how multi-level governance should be organized. Could lead to spatially blind policy interventions if interventions not organized correctly
3. Elite capture - unequal power. Rhetoric of partnership creation but small elite end up taking decisions. Someone still needs to decide which locals have a voice, but who?
4. Experience differences: Locals often don’t know about governance, or the experience for bottom up development. When top says ok do your own thing, some places will fail to do so as they don’t know how. Some places will adapt better than others to this change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly