Week 2 Flashcards
The 5 Characteristics of Quality Scientific Research
1) Reliability, Objectivity, Validity
2) Bias (using techniques that reduce bias)
3) Generalizability
4) Public (by publishing research)
5) Replicated
Subjective
Knowledge of the event being shaped by prior beliefs, expectations, events, experiences or mood.
Objective
All scientific experiments strive for objectivity.
Assumption that certain facts of the world can be tested independently from the individual who describes them (the researcher).
Objective Measurements
The measurement of an entity or behaviour that is consistent across all instruments and observers.
Usually to a certain degree/margin of error.
Variable
An object, concept or event being measured
Self-reporting
A method of data collection
Responses are provided directly from the people who are being studied.
Through surveys, interviews, face-to-face, questionnaires, etc).
Operational Definitions
Needed in a quality scientific study.
Statements to describe the procedures/operations and specific measures that are used to record operations.
Reliability
Consistant, stable results
Validity
Measuring what you intended to measure
Generalizability
The degree to which results can be applied to real life applications/ individuals or events.
Ecology Validity
The degree to which results obtained in a lab study can be repeated in a natural environment.
Hawthorne Effect
In the 1920’s the Hawthorne Electric Company factory looked at how changing the environment affects productivity. Did not work because factory workers knew they were being watched and changed their behaviour so that productivity increased.
When behaviour changes as a result of being observed.
Single-Blind Study
When the participants do not know the purpose of the study or what type of treatment they have received.
Double-Blind Study
More effective than a single blind study.
Both the subject and researcher are unaware of the purpose of the study and the type of treatment.
Peer-Review
Peers are other experts in the specific field of study.
When submitting research for publication other experts in that field of study critique the research.
Replication
The process of repeating an experiment AND getting the same results.
Anecdotal Evidence
An individuals testimony about an observation event that is used to make a claim as evidence.
Appeal to Authority
The belief that an “expert’s” claim is the right one when no supporting data or scientific evidence is present.
Appeal to Common Sense
A claim that appears to be sound but has no supporting scientific evidence.
Appeal to Tradition
“We have always done it that way”
A claim that follows tradition but has no supporting scientific evidence.
Appeal to Novelty
“It’s the latest thing”
A claim that seems right because of popularity but has no supporting scientific evidence”
Confounding Variables
Variables that are outside of the researchers control that will affect the the results of the study.