Week 12 Flashcards
Peter wants to sell his cello
• This sentence means that:
• A: Peter owns a cello and in the possible worlds compatible with his desires he sells the cello
• B: Peter believes he owns a cello and in the possible worlds compatible with his desires he sells the cello
A
Dimension.
- attitude holder:
the proposition expressed by the complement is true for the attitude holder
Dimension.
• the type of possible worlds:
restricted by the lexical semantics of the attitude verb
example • Peter wants to sell his cello attitude holder: • possible worlds: • = in the worlds compatible with Peter’s desire, he sells his cello • not necessarily true in other worlds
- Peter
- worlds compatible with Peter’s desires
believe v. know: similarities (2)
- the attitude verb restricts the worlds in which P is true
- the attitude holder believes that P is true
believe v. know: differences (2)
- believe: we don’t know what the speaker thinks about P
* know: the speaker believes P is true
Peter regrets selling his cello
• This sentence means that:
• A: Peter sold his cello and in the possible worlds in which Peter gets what he wants he didn’t sell the cello
• B: Peter believes he sold his cello and in the possible worlds in which he gets what he wants he didn’t sell his cello
B
what all verbs of propositional attitudes have in common is that …
if they assume that something holds about p, then the attitude- holder believes p
presuppositions:
• a requirement that something holds (p is true) for a sentence to be uttered felicitously
my daughter is a brilliant hockey player
• presupposes that …
I (=the speaker) have a daughterI
I’ll get the blue car
• presupposes that …
there is a unique blue car
Peter is going to NYC too
• presupposes that…
someone else is going to NYC
if the complement of an attitude verb presupposes something about its complement, then the whole utterance presupposes that ….
the attitude-holder believes p
ambiguity:
• when a DP appears inside of a complement of a modal predicate, then it is systematically ambiguous
de re/ de dicto readings:
- in the de re reading, the DP “escapes” from being evaluated in the possible worlds restricted by the modal predicate (extensional)
- in the de dicto reading, the DP is evaluated in the scope of the modal predicate (intensional)
ex: John believes that your paper will be accepted
de re reading:
de dicto reading:
de re reading:
- John reviewed your paper and he told me about it without knowing it was your paper
- but I know its yours…
de dicto reading:
-John’s world
Where does the difference come from (de re reading and de dicto reading)?
in general, differences in scope, i.e., genuine systematic ambiguities, arise through movement
What are some presuppositional triggers?
- again
- too
- definite expressions
- pronouns
p: I’m not going to see the new Transformers. q: I’m going to see a movie • A: p entails q • B: q entails p • C: p entails q and q entails p • D: there is no entailment
D
What are the four tests that presuppositions have to pass in order to be presuppositions?
- embedding under setential negation
- embedded within If- clauses
- embedding under modals
- questions