Week 11 Reading: Curry and Nunez-Smith (2015) Flashcards

1
Q

Curry and Nunez-Smith argument about definitions

A

Establishing a definition for mixed-methods is important, however, even when researchers agree on a definition, diversity in their own disciplinary and methodological expertise (transcending the definition) can hinder effective communication and collaboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Curry and Nunez-Smith definition of mixed-method research

A

Research combines elements of qual and quant approaches for the purposes of breadth and depth of understanding and corroboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is methodological bilingualism + what is a way to facilitate it

A

Having minimum competency in both quant and qual methods

How to facilitate it: keep a glossary of key conceptual and methodological terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

inductive vs deductive

A

inductive (whereby themes, codes and categories emerge from the data) “ground up”

or deductive (whereby themes, codes and categories are chosen a priori, before the analysis starts).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

key informant

A

individual with direct experience of the topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when to use mixed methods

A

when using both methods would give you greater insight than one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

2 key considerations in mixed methods

A

1) how the components will be integrated into each other
2) when they will be carried out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

post hoc design (bad)

A

data is collected and the data is fit into a design retrospectively (avoid this)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

three types of integration (integrating the data from the approaches)

A

merged, connected, embedded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

merged integration

A
  • can occur after data collection and analysis
  • findings are interpreted to find concordance, discordance, divergence, complementarity amongst sets
  • can illustrate complementary dimensions of success/failure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

connected integration

A

one type builds on another, ie one dataset informs the next one, ie used to develop measurement tools for the next one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

embedded integration

A

usually when:
- secondary question with different method is embedded into primary question
- i.e. in a quant study a qual component is nested in to support development of intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

term for the timing of quant and qual components in relation to each other

A

relative timing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

convergent design

A

both data collection methods conducted simultaneously (at the same time but the participants or sample might be different so it doesnt have to be physically done together)
- merged or embedded integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

triangulation

A

single phenomenon examined by multiple observers, theories, methods, or data sources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

exploratory sequential

A

qual -> quant
- connected or embedded integration

17
Q

explanatory sequential

A

quant -> qual
- connected or embedded integration

18
Q

concurrent embedded design

A

two things done simultaneously but this time simultaneously probably means that it’s the same participants and sample and the embedded part is just part of the method