Week 11 Lecture 11 - Transdiagnostic approach Flashcards
Harvey, Watkins, Mansell & Shafran (2004) conducted Systematic review of cognitive & behavioural processes in Adult Axis 1 Disorders
What was found?
Criteria for a transdiagnostic process:
Strong methodology (e.g. valid measure; control group)
Present in ALL disorders & over 4 disorders
- 12 ‘definite’ Transdiagnostic processes + 3 ‘possible
Harvey, Watkins, Mansell & Shafran (2004) conducted Systematic review of cognitive & behavioural processes in Adult Axis 1 Disorders
What advantages were highlighted?
- generalise models across disorders;
- understand comorbidity;
- inform transdiagnostic treatments
What are the 5 groups of processes found in the transdiagnostic approach?
- attention
- memory
- reasoning
- thinking
- behaviours
5 realms were identified in the transdiagnostic approach
What processes come under attention?
Hypervigilance to external threat
Attentional avoidance of external threat
Hypervigilance to internal experiences
5 realms were identified in the transdiagnostic approach
What processes come under memory?
Recurrent intrusive memories
Selective memory
(Overgeneral memory) –> narrower in applicability
5 realms were identified in the transdiagnostic approach
What processes come under reasoning?
Interpretational bias
Expectancy bias
Emotional reasoning
5 realms were identified in the transdiagnostic approach
What processes come under thinking?
Recurrent negative thinking
Metacognitive beliefs
(Thought suppression) –> narrower in applicability
5 realms were identified in the transdiagnostic approach
What processes come under behaviours?
Avoidance
Safety-seeking behaviours
Experiential Avoidance
Core Process Research in a Clinical Sample
What was the method?
146 patients of different diagnoses
Scale of 15 different transdiagnostic processes
Factor Analysis
Core Process Research in a Clinical Sample
What was found?
One Factor Solution, 13 items r >.4
Anxiety , depression
Standardised measures of thought suppression, worry & experiential avoidance r = .5 to .7
Higher scores in clinical vs. non-clinical sample,p < .001
No differences based on diagnosis
(anxiety/mood/eating/psychosis/ somatoform)
Separate processes vs core process in predicting distress in students & in chronic physical illness
What was the method?
- compared separate processes and core processes model
- how was do separate processes (worry, thought suppression and avoidance) predict DASS?
- how well does this compare to a single core process that has all these 3 things in common?
Separate processes vs core process in predicting distress in students & in chronic physical illness
What was found?
- greater correlation for core process model
- 1 factor is beneath these 3 separate dimensions (worry, thought suppression and avoidance)
To understand the core process….What does psychological distress and recovery involve?
What was the method?
Qualitative Interviews & Analysis
- Natural recovery across disorders (Higginson & Mansell, 2008)
- Primary care service (McEvoy et al., 2012)
- Bipolar disorder (Mansell et al., 2010)
- Eating problems (Alsawy & Mansell, 2013)
- Use of art in recovery (Stevenson-Taylor & Mansell, 2012)
To understand the core process….What does psychological distress and recovery involve?
What was found?
Themes of loss of control at the ‘rock bottom’ & regaining control as the process of recovery
Fits with wider literature
What is control and why is it important?
Homeostasis is control; this is essential for life
Now: temperature; balance; blood sugar
Co-ordination & movement for any activity relies on control