WEEK 11 - Groups and teams Flashcards
Types of group
Groups generally fall into three types:
- interacting
- co-acting
- counteracting
Interacting groups
The more the work group has to interact in order to complete a task, the more the interdependence among group members
Effective, interacting groups are characterised by a high degree of co-operation among their members.
Co-acting groups
Counteracting groups are groups with opposing aims which may be ‘locked into’ a power struggle in their endeavours to compete for scarce resources.
Counteracting groups
Counteracting groups are groups with opposing aims which may be ‘locked into’ a power struggle in their endeavours to compete for scarce resources.
formal function of a group?
to fulfil organisational goals
The advantages of groups are?
- the ability to work on complex interdependent tasks;
- a means of generating new ideas and creative solutions to complex problems;
- for purposes of liaison and co-ordination;
- to facilitate the implementation of complex decisions;
- as a vehicle for change;
- to enable the socialisation and training of new members;
- In addition to these formal functions, groups also fulfil various social needs.
two primary objectives of the organisational group:
- effective task completion
* member satisfaction.
The benefits of the ‘organic’ work group?
- the emergence of ‘logical’ or natural groups;
- the appropriate use of groups;
- the composition of effective, well-balanced groups;
- frank and open communication and exchange of information
Summarise in one or two sentences the distinction between formal and social functions of groups
??
Group dynamics - Norms
- affect both member attitudes and behaviour;
- must be accepted by the majority of the group and cannot be imposed from external sources;
- vary according to the degree of acceptance given them by the group;
- differ in direct relation to the amount of deviation that members will accept;
- are formed with respect to matters of significance or importance to the group;
- usually apply to the entire group;
- clarify the influence process within the group;
- may facilitate the process of hierarchy, leadership and control;
- apply to group behaviour, not individual members’ thoughts and feelings;
- the pace of development and change is relatively slow.
Group dynamics - Conformity of norms
- there is incompatibility between a member’s personal goals and those of the group or organization;
- there is no sense of pride from being a member of the group;
- a member is in a peripheral position in the group and is not recognised as a fully fledged member;
- the price of conformity is perceived as being too high.
Groupthink
Groupthink refers to a mode of thinking that persons engage in when concurrence-seeking becomes so dominant in a cohesive in-group that it tends to override realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action
Symptoms of groupthink
- An illusion of invulnerability: Members ignore danger, take extreme risk and are overly optimistic.
- Collective rationalization: Members discredit and explain away warning contrary to group thinking.
- Belief in inherent morality: Members discredit and explain away warning contrary to group thinking.
- Stereotyped views of out-groups: The group constructs negative stereotypes of rivals outside the group.
- Direct pressure on dissenters: Members pressure any in the group who expresses arguments against the group’s stereotypes, illusions, or commitments, viewing such opposition as disloyalty.
- Self-censorship: Members withhold their dissenting views and counter-arguments.
- Illusion of unanimity: Members perceive falsely that everyone agrees with the group’s decision; silence is seen as consent.
- ‘Mind guards’ are appointed: Some members appoint themselves to the role of protecting the group from adverse information that might threaten group complacency.
Consequences of groupthink
- The group focuses its attention to a narrow range of potential action. •The group neglects to re-consider the optimal or multi-laterally agreed initial course of action as a result of the discovery of potential risks and less favorable consequence which had not been considered initially. •The group does not consider those courses of action which were set aside due to a lack of worth or profitability initially identified by the proposals.
- The group fails to consider independent authoritative advice when considering the various options.
- Members of the group demonstrate bias to their preferred options and ignore important information which does not support their bias.
Groupthink avoidance measures
Assemble a diverse team
Focus Roles – Client, Facilitator, Resources;
Encourage Individual Champions