W5.b Flashcards

1
Q

Why social groups are important?

A

They influence what we think, feel and do.

They form one of the key bases of social perception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is self-categorization?

A

Process of seeing oneself as a group member

  • Social identities are accessible
  • In extreme form: De-individuation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When is self-categorization likely to happen?

A

When we experience direct reminders of group membership.

When in the presence of out-group members.

In a minority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the consequences of social and self categorization?

A

Me – self categorization–> We/Us
Interpersonal I I Intergroup
You –social categorization–> Them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the consequences for perceptions of inter and intra group structure?

A

Category differentiation model (Doise, 1978)

  • Intergroup differentiation
  • Within group homogeneity (especially for outgroups)

“Group-ness” is amplified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is outgroup homogeneity?

A

Cross-race identification bias (‘other race’ effect)

Platz & Hosch (1988)

  • Texas convenience store clerks
  • Identification of customers
  • Increased accuracy for own in-group vs. out-group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is stereotypes?

A

Content-related consequences of social categorization

Stereotype: cognitive representation of impressions/expectancies about a social group (probable behaviors. traits, features) (cf. prejudice)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the content of Stereotype?

A

Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske et al., 2012)
Warmth and Competence
High W and High C – Admiration. high status, not competitive. E.g., in-group, close allies.
High W and Low C – Paternalistic stereotype. Low status, not competitive. E.g., housewives, elderly people, disabled people.
Low W and High C – Envious stereotype. High status, competitive. E.g., Asians, Jews, rich people, feminists.
Low W and Low C – Contemptuous stereotype. Low status, competitive. E.g., welfare recipients, poor people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How stereotypes are activated?

A

Automatically activated
Even the mere presence of a social category cue can be enough to activate (make accessible) a range of stereotype content.

Implicit Associations Test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald et al., 1998)?

A

Implicit measure of associations between social categories and other concepts.
IAT has also been used to measure attitudes (e.g., prejudice and self-esteem).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does Implicit Associations Test work?

A

Response-time paradigm
-Patterns of RTs tell us something about underlying mental representations (here stereotypes)

Categorization task

  • During the task, targets (often words) are placed into categories by pressing one of two response keys
  • Arrangement of categories on screen makes sections of the task more or less difficult
  • Comparing RTs on different sections of the task gives an indication of stereotypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the effects of stereotypes?

Duncan’s experiment

A

Stereotypes can bias judgments about individuals
-Change the way that ambiguous behavior is interpreted

Duncan (1976)
White American participants witness an ambiguous shove (aggressive or playful) between confederates of different social categories.
- Stereotype of group to which shover belonged influenced interpretation
- Aggression was (and perhaps still is) part of the African American stereotype; here it shapes interpretation of the ambiguous shove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Distinguish stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination

A

Stereotype: cognitive representations of impressions of groups by associating the groups with particular characteristics (beliefs).

Prejudice: positive or negative evaluations of social group or its members (attitudes)

Discrimination: positive or negative behaviour directed toward a social group or its members.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is in-group favoritism?

A

We tend to have more favorable attitudes and behaviours towards the groups to which we belong than to groups to which we don’t.

In-group favoritism, in-group bias, inter-group bias, inter-group discrimination
-Preference (in attitudes or behaviors) for in-groups over out-groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why does in-group favoritism happen?

A

Social Identity Theory (SIT)
People prefer to have a positive self-concept (valuing me and mine)
Our selves are composed of personal and group-related (social) aspects/identities.
We are motivated to increase the positivity of our own groups relative to out-groups.
In a sense, value mine (my group) as a way of valuing “me”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which experiment test the minimal conditions of in-group favoritism?

A

Tajfel et al (1971)

  • Schoolchildren
  • Choose either Klee’s or Kandinsky’s painting
  • Assigned into two groups, which has nothing to do with their choice of painting (they don’t know this)
  • Point allocation task
  • In-group favoritism appeared

Mere categorization (based on minimal group conditions) elicited in-group favoritism.

17
Q

What is Group serving biases?

A

Oskamp & Harty (1968): It is positive when the in-group does it.

Ultimate Attribution Error (Pettigrew, 1979)
In-group positive behaviors: disposition
Out-group positive behaviors: situation
vice versa

18
Q

What other factors escalate us vs. them framing into conflict?

A

Categorization lays the groundwork

Competition

Threat

19
Q

How does competition escalate conflict?

A

Realistic Conflict Theory Intergroup hostility arises from competition among groups for scarce (and thus valued) material resources.

In-group favoritism exacerbated under competition.

20
Q

How does intergroup threat escalate conflict?

A

Integrated Threat Theory

Realistic threat: threats to the material well-being of the ingroup, such as their economic benefits, political power, and health.
Symbolic threat: threats to the in-group’s system of values
Intergroup anxiety: feelings of anxiety people experience during intergroup interactions associated with negative outcomes for the self (embarrassed, rejected, ridiculed).

Riek et al (2006)

  • Meta analysis
  • Realistic, symbolic and anxiety positively associated with negative outgroup attitudes.
21
Q

Methods of prejudice reduction

A

Contact
-extended contact
-imagined contact
Contact hypothesis: the theory that certain types of
direct contact between members of hostile groups will reduce stereotyping and prejudice.

Changing categorization

Superordinate goals

22
Q

What are the optimal conditions for “contact”, which is a method of prejudice reduction?

A

The more contact one has with an outgroup, the less prejudice one expresses.

Contact is most effective when: equal status, shared goals, authority sanction, absence of competition.

How?

  • Knowledge
  • Anxiety
  • Empathy/perspective taking
23
Q

What is extended contact?

A

Knowledge that other ingroup members have outgroup friends can reduce intergroup bias.

Wright et al. (1997)

  • Phase 1: Two groups formed (on the basis of “personality”) and labeled blue or green.
  • Phase 2: One confederate from each group chosen to interact (Friendly; Hostile, Neutral)
  • Phase 3: Ingroup and outgroup evaluations: traits (e.g., intelligent, confident, inflexible, indifferent) and performance qualities (e.g., effective communication, effective problem solver)
24
Q

How does empathy and perspective taking reduce prejudice?

A

Putting oneself “in another’s shoes” emotionally (empathy) or cognitively (perspective taking) decrease ingroup favoritism.

Galinsky & Moskowitz (2000)

  • Formed groups based on minimal group paradigm: overestimators vs. underestimators
  • Control vs. perspective taking
25
Q

How does changing categorization reduce prejudice?

A

Change the cognitive representation of outgroup members so it is no longer simply us vs. them

Re-categorization
-“Us” and “them” become super-ordinate “we”
De-categorization
-“They” become individuals

26
Q

Experiment of changing categorization

A

Participants initially form two 3-person groups (A and B) and interact within-groups, and come up with group names.
Then, come together to do a task.

Manipulation

  • Control: retain original two group structure and identity (aaabbb)
  • Re-categorization: form one new, superordinate group (ababab)
  • De-categorization: separate individuals, with nicknames (ababab)

Evaluations
Ingroup - Outgroup difference: One < Separate < Two

27
Q

Experiment of promoting cooperation

A

The Robber’s Cave (Sherif et al., 1961)

Summer camp
Two groups: Eagles and Rattlers
Tournament (i.e., competition: Intergroup conflict
But then, cooperative interaction
-Superordinate goals: shared goals that can be achieved only if groups work together.

28
Q

Why contact may not undermine stereotype?

A

Explaining away inconsistent information

Compartmentalizing inconsistent information: Defend their stereotypes by resorting to specific subtypes.
Subtypes: A narrower and more specific social group.
E.g., Male executives who work alongside highly competent female colleagues can form a ‘career woman’ subtype that allows them to maintain a more general belief that most women cannot succeed in business.

Differentiating atypical group members: Contrast effects.

  • Seeing stereotype-disconfirming individuals as remarkable or exceptional people.
  • Perceivers can easily decide that these unusual people are not true group members at all.
29
Q

What kind of contact works to overcome stereotype?

A

Repeated inconsistency: An antidote for “explaining away”.

Widespread inconsistency: An antidote for subtyping

Being typical as well as inconsistent: An antidote for contrast effects
-individual stereotype violators provide strong and consistent reminders of their group membership.