W11.b Flashcards
Personality influence Relationships - marriage
Personality traits predict various relationship outcomes:
A and C –> higher marital satisfaction
Both actor and partner effects (what is good for one seems to be good for the another)
A and C –> lower rates of infidelity
N –> decreased marital stability
Both actor and partner effects
Personality influence Relationships - divorce
Meta-analysis:
N, lower C & A predicts divorce up to 45 years later…
Explained in terms of indirect effects, via relationship dynamics
Two potential pathways
- Enduring Dynamics: personality consistently impacts on relationship dynamics in ways that may ultimately lead to its dissolution
- Emergent Distress : personality trait influence how they response to factors that cause changes in dynamic. E.g.,
Low A & C via negative communication patterns
High N via negative emotion
Personality influence Relationship - assortive mating
Correlations between partners’ personality traits generally positive
rs up to .35 for Big Five domains
Generally highest for openness/intellect
Personality influence Criminal and antisocial behaviour
Low C and Low A - Antisocial, aggression, crime
However, C positively predicted ‘white collar’ criminal behaviour in a German sample
Explanations for personality influence Criminal and antisocial behaviour
(Direct and Indirect effect)
Direct effects
e.g., aggressive behaviour is simply a state expression of low A
Indirect effects
- Agreeableness via moral disengagement: beliefs that fighting can be justified, and teasing is not harmful
- Conscientiousness via poor impulse control
Liberal/Progressive ideology
Conservative/Traditional ideology
Liberal/Progressive ideology:
Emphasis on equality; protection of human rights
Conservative/Traditional ideology:
Emphasis on personal responsibility; protection of individual freedoms; order and tradition
Multiple dimensional approaches Conservatism:
Right Wing Authoritarianism (RWA)
Social Conservatism
Economic Conservatism
Right Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) - endorsement of
Respect for traditions and social norms (traditionalism)
Deference to authorities and institutions - Belief in the need for coercive social control (authoritarianism)
AKA ‘Social Conservatism’
Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) - endorsement of hierarchies and social/group inequality
AKA ‘Economic Conservatism’
Agreeableness on political
Value Social harmony/cooperation
Egalitarian
Less SDO
Conscientiousness on political
More Self-regulation
Value Order/structure
Somewhat socially conservative (RWA)
Openness/Intellect on political
Receptivity to new ideas; Tolerance of change
More progressive; Less socially conservative (RWA)
‘Predictive validity’ vs. ‘Predictive power’
Predictive Validity: Does a measure predict what it should? Have theoretical implications for testing predictions from personality theory.
Predictive power: Does this association tell us something particular useful? Have practical implications in terms of predicting important outcomes, and intervening to change important outcomes.