veto players Flashcards
veto player (individual or collective)
actors whose agreement is necessary to change the status quo (current policy)
change in the status quo requires…?
unanimous decision of all veto players
a player (i) is a veto player if…?
N (number of players in political game) - i is a losing coalition
OR
if all winning coalitions include i
2 types of veto players
- institutional
- partisan
institutional veto players
formally defined by the law
example: legislation to be approved by the president, the house & the senate (1 individual, 2 collective)
partisan veto players
generated by the political game
example: majority party, parties in a coalition
circular indifference curves
individual is indifferent between all the alternatives in a given radius of her ideal point
assumption of circular indifference curves
same intensity of preferences in each issue (care about tax rates as much as healthcare)
winset of the status quo
the set of policies that can beat the status quo in a vote
relationship between veto player and w(sq)?
w(sq) is the set of alternatives closer to their ideal point than sq
relationship between w(sq) and multiple veto players?
w(sq) is the intersection of the indifference curves of all of them
relationship between more veto players and size of w(sq)
negative; all veto players have to agree on a new policy to replace sq
stricter voting rules…?
causes a larger number of veto players
stricter voting rules TEND to…?
reduce size of the w(sq)
size of w(sq) ALWAYS…?
DECREASES or STAYS THE SAME with addition of a new veto player (never expands)
unanimity core
the set of policies that cannot be defeated if decisions are taken by unanimity
what does unanimity core depend on?
location of the veto players’ ideal points
how does adding more veto players affects the unanimity core?
tends to EXPAND the unanimity core
policy stability
difficulty of a system in changing the status quo; probability of policy change
a bigger w(sq) indicates…?
less stable system (many policies that can beat the sq)
a bigger unanimity core indicates…?
more stable system (there are more points that cannot be changed)
how does the addition of a new veto player tend to affect policy stability?
either INCREASES stability or leaves the situation UNCHANGED, but never reduces stability
the larger the number of veto players…?
the more stable the system will be
the bigger the distance between the veto players…?
the more stable the system (for a given SQ)
starting from a given sq, if one of the veto players moves to a more distant/extreme policy position, it causes…? (2)
- smaller w(sq)
- bigger unanimity core