Validity - A-level Flashcards
validity definition
extent to which an observed effect is genuine and measures what it is supposed to measure, and if it can be generalised beyond the research setting within which it can be found
face validity definition
basic form of validity in which a measure is scrutinised to determine if it appears to measure what it is supposed to
concurrent validity definition
extent to which a psychological measure relates to an existing similar measure
what does validity refer to
if a psychological test, observation, experiment etc produces a result that is legitimate
ecological validity definition
extent to which finding from a research study can be generalised to other settings and situations, this is a form of external validity
temporal validity definition
extent to which findings from a research study can be generlised to other historical times and eras, a form of external validity
internal validity
if the researcher has measured what they intended to
external validity
extent to which the findings can be generalised beyond the research setting in which they are found
can data be reliable but not valid
yes, if data is consistent but wrong. for example if scales constantly measure a weight at 500g but in it actually weights 600g. this is giving the same answer consistently so is reliable, but the answer is incorrect so is wrong
what is internal validity
if effects observed are due to the manipulation is the independent variable and not to another factor
what is a major threat to internal validity
demand characteristics as participants act in the way they think is expected
what is external validity
the extent to which it relates to factors outside of the investigation such as generalising to other settings, populations and eras
what type of validity of ecological validity
external validity
what is ecological validity
generalising findings to other settings (everyday life)
what has low ecological validity
if there is mundane realism and the dependent variable is not like everyday life
what must be looked at when deciding ecological validity
all aspects of the research set-up in order to decide if findings can be generalised beyond the particular research setting
what is temporal validity
if the findings from a particular study, or concepts within the study hold true over time
what are 2 ways of assessing reliability
-face validity
-concurrent validity
what is face validity
if a test or scale appears to measure what is is supposed to measure.
how can face validity be determined
by simply eyeballing the measuring instrument or by passing it to an expert to check
what is concurrent validity
if a particular test or scale is demonstrated when the results are very close to, or match, those obtained on another recognised scale or test
how is concurrent validity analysed
close agreement between the two sets of data would indictae that the new test has a high concurrent validity. this is if correlation coefficient is at +0.80 or above
how can the validity of experiments be improved
-using a control group means the researcher can better assess if change in the dependent variable were due to the effect of the independent variable
-procedures can be standardised to minimise the impact of participant reactivity and investigator effects on the validity of the outcome
-single-blind or double-blind procedures are used to reduce the effect of demand characteristics
- in a double-blind procedure a third party conducts the investigation without knowing its main purpose which reduces both demand characteristics and investigator effects and therefore improves reliability
how can the validity of questionnaires be improved
-incorporate a lie scale within the questions in order to assess the consistency of a respondent’s response and control the effects of social desirability bias
-can be enhanced by ensuring all data submitted is anonymous