Validity - A-level Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

validity definition

A

extent to which an observed effect is genuine and measures what it is supposed to measure, and if it can be generalised beyond the research setting within which it can be found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

face validity definition

A

basic form of validity in which a measure is scrutinised to determine if it appears to measure what it is supposed to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

concurrent validity definition

A

extent to which a psychological measure relates to an existing similar measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does validity refer to

A

if a psychological test, observation, experiment etc produces a result that is legitimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ecological validity definition

A

extent to which a psychological measure relates to an existing similar measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

temporal validity definition

A

extent to which findings form a research study can be generalised to other settings and situations–> form of external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

internal validity

A

if the researcher has measured what they intended to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

external validity

A

extent to which the findings can be generalised beyond the research setting in which they are found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

can data be reliable but not valid

A

yes, if data is consistent but wrong. for example if scales constantly measure a weight at 500g but in it actually weights 600g. this is giving the same answer consistently so is reliable, but the answer is incorrect so is wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is internal validity

A

if effects observed are due to the manipulation is the independent variable and not to another factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is a major threat to internal validity

A

demand characteristics as participants act in the way they think is expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is external validity

A

the extent to which it relates to factors outside of the investigation such as generalising to other settings, populations and eras

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what type of validity of ecological validity

A

external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is ecological validity

A

generalising findings to other settings (everyday life)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what has low ecological validity

A

if there is mundane realism and the dependent variable is not like everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what must be looked at when deciding ecological validity

A

all aspects of the research set-up in order to decide if findings can be generalised beyond the particular research setting

15
Q

what is temporal validity

A

if the findings from a particular study, or concepts within the study hold true over time

16
Q

what are 2 ways of assessing reliability

A

-face validity
-concurrent validity

17
Q

what is face validity

A

if a test or scale appears to measure what is is supposed to measure.

18
Q

how can face validity be determined

A

by simply eyeballing the measuring instrument or by passing it to na expert to check

19
Q

what is concurrent validity

A

if a particular test or scale is demonstrated when the results are very close to, or match, those obtained on another recognised scale or test

20
Q

how is concurrent validity analysed

A

close agreement between the two sets of data would indictae that the new test has a high concurrent validity. this is if correlation coefficient is at +0.80 or above

21
Q

how can the validity of experiments be improved

A

-using a control group means the researcher can better assess if change in the dependent variable were due to the effect of the independent variable
-procedures can be standardised to minimise the impact of participant reactivity and investigator effects on the validity of the outcome
-single-blind or double-blind procedures are used to reduce the effect of demand characteristics
- in a double-blind procedure a third party conducts the investigation without knowing its main purpose which reduces both demand characteristics and investigator effects and therefore improves reliability

22
Q

how can the validity of questionnaires be improved

A

-incorporate a lie scale within the questions in order to assess the consistency of a respondent’s response and control the effects of social desirability bias
-can be enhanced by ensuring all data submitted is anonymous

23
Q

how can reliability of observations be improved

A

-can produce findings with very high ecological validity, particularly in the case of covert observations, as behaviour is more likely to be natural and authentic
-if behaviour categories are too broad, overlapping or ambiguous may have a negative impact on validity of data collected

24
Q

why are qualitative research methods seen as having ecological validity

A

higher ecological validity than quantitative which are less interpretive methods of research. this is because the detail collected from things such as case studies and interviews are better able to reflect a participants reality

25
Q

what is interpretive validity

A

the extent to which researcher’s interpretation of events matched that of their participants

26
Q

how can interpretive validity be demonstrated

A

things such as coherence of the researchers narrative and the inconclusion of direct quotes from participants within the report.

27
Q

how can validity be further enhanced

A

triangulation

28
Q

what is triangulation

A

use of a number of different sources as evidence, for example data complied through interviews with friends, family, personal diaries, observations etc