Validity Flashcards
Validity
Degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses.
- Not about the test itself but about the construct
- Not an all-or-none issue, it’s a degree
- Based on solid emperical evidence/theory
Construct validity
Degree to which test scores can be interpreted as reflecting a particular psychological construct.
5 facets/measurement:
- Test content
- Response processes
- Internal structure
- Associations w other variables
- Consequence of use
Test content
The nature of the construct should dictate the content for the test.
- the match between the actual content of the test and what should be included in the test
- evidence is expert rating of test content
Threats:
- construct-irrelevant content
- construct underrepresentation; not the full scope
- no face validity
Internal structure
Dimensionality in which the parts of the test are related to each other.
- Number of factors should match the number of dimensions in a construct
- Associations among factors should match
- The meaning of each factor has to match actual components
- Evidence is factor analysis
Response processes
Match between process actually used in the measurement and the one they should use
- Direct evidence; questionnaire, which thought process used
- indirect evidence: eye tracking, item-total cor.
Threat:
- Poorly disigned items (misinterpretation)
- Respondents; guessing/social desireable
Associations w other variables
The measure’s actual association w other measures and the association the test should have w other measures
- Convergent evidence; correlation with measures of related construct
- Discriminant evidence’; equally uncorrelated w measures they shouldn’t correlate with
!! convergent is aboit associations w other constructs that you expect from theory. Criterion, concurrent and predictive validity are ab out the relation with some other VARIABLE, like age, GPA or income.
Criterion, concurrent and predictive validity
Criterion validity; the criterion used for the test, eg the cut-off score for admission to uni, should be meaningfully correlated w what you should know
Concurrent validity; correlatioon w variables measured at the same time. Eg eindexamen compared to rest of the grades/;
Predictive validity; Correlation w variables measured in future time point, Eg eindexamen vs degrees in first year of uni
Consequence of testing
Intended effect vs actual effect
- Eg when hiring new worker; You want the assessment to maximize probability of good outcome vs bad one.
- Differential output on group must be taken into account
- Possibility that test use might have effect on organizational systems.