Unit 4: Ch. 19 Flashcards
equivalents
population = all of literature
sample = portion of literature relevant to your review
data = content of articles
systematic review
a review in which the research process is used to objectively and methodically extract findings from research articles and synthesize them for the purpose of generalization
systematic reviews include? (2)
- synthesis (qualitative)
- narratively combines results from different studies - meta-analysis (quantitative)
- typically uses the effect size of intervention studies and combines them with statistics
history of systematic reviews
idk if this is important or not - it was in the notes
agriculture and astronomy
meta-analyses
academic researchers
why conduct systematic reviews? (6)
- determine best evidence to inform practice, policies, procedures, and decision making
- determine the state of the science on a specific topic (typically see this in introduction paragraph)
- critique studies
- summarize findings
- get to know a body of literature
- useful for publications that can simmer
- coming back to systematic review –> take break –> back to systematic review –> break –> repeat
7 step process
- formulate a problem statement
- search the literature
- gather data from research articles
- evaluate the articles and the studies
- analyze and integrate data
- interpret the evidence
- disseminate findings
step 1: problem formation
narrow specific topic (not something like “what is health?” - too broad)
limited amount of literature
what’s the problem? why is it important?
research question/hypothesis
inclusion and exclusion criteria
who is known for writing a lot of systematic reviews?
Harris Cooper
step 2: literature search
search the literature for relevant articles
all articles vs selected articles
all sources vs best quality sources
how much time, money, and people-power do you have for conducting the review?
step 3: data gathering from study articles
coding guide: really a questionnaire
coders: people that go in, read the articles, and pull out the results
aim is to gather accurate objective data
step 4: study evaluation
evaluate each article against inclusion and exclusion criteria
for each article consider:
- internal validity
- external validity
- construct validity
- statistical validity
looking at the quality of each article
step 5: study outcomes, analysis, and interpretation
may be comparing the info in cells on tables for a synthesis
may be entering data and running statistics for a meta-analysis (looking at the effect size w/ a meta-analysis)
-Forest plot to visually see the meta-analysis may be helpful
step 6: evidence interpretation
reduction of separate data points into statements that answers the research question or hypothesis
-analogous to the analysis part of quantitative research
summarize cumulative research evidence regarding conclusiveness, generalizability, and limitations to arrive at overall conclusions
step 7: dissemination
manuscript –> article
- manuscript: what you’re working on (not yet published)
- article: what’s published
podium presentation
poster presentation