social mobility
the possibility of moving up and/or down the social ladder through either hard work, generated wealth, skill and parentage
intergenerational social mobility
how parents social class, status, education and wealth can impact the individuals social class, karl marx calls this “the division of labour and durkheim suggests that this is part of an “organic society”
differential achievement
up and down the generational income ladder in britain
pygmalion in the classroom
marxism
strengths and weaknesses of marxism
strengths
- draws attention to importance of conflict as the “motor of history”
- emphasises the importance of economic ownership
- draws attention to the exploitation of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie
weaknesses
- focuses too much on economy
- fundamentally all classes are made up of individuals and marx often forgets this
- functionalists would suggest that society is not based on conflict at all
weberianism
strengths and weaknesses of weber
strengths
- gives good account of how class operates in a modern environment
- explains how white collar work will grow and increase in diversification
- combines a structural and action approach to class
weaknesses
- unclear about relationship between class status and party
- feminists not happy
- underestimates importance of economic class divisions in society
oxford mobility study goldthorpe 1972
strengths and weaknesses of oxford
strengths
- first major study since glass
- challenged many of the conventional views on social mobility
- found that the service class was not so closed and self recruiting as previously thought
weaknesses
- criticised for ignoring existence of elites at the top of the class structure
- underestimated the impact of self recruitment and continued social closure
- criticised by feminists as based study wholly on men
behavioural sink john b. calhoun
strengths of sink