Unit 2: pos/neg map types Flashcards
dot maps pos/neg
pos: visual so easy to understand, easy to compare distribution - easy to interpit data
neg: no value - false sense of emptiness, dots can overlap and becomes hard to read - can mess up data if viewer becomes confused
isoline maps pos/neg
pos: shows gradual change over a large area - uses fixed intervals so change is easily identified, can add colour,
neg: shading imples equal values between isolines, small lines and numbers can be difficult to read, requires data from large numbers of locations - time consuming
choropleth maps pos/neg
pos: shows large amount of data and patterns, colour and shading shows a range of values - easy distinction between areas, clear grouping of data is shown, easy to interpret data spread as its visual
neg: intervals and class sizes need to be chosen carefully to avoid confusion, can be difficult to distinguish between colours and patters, could have variations of data that is not displayed
proportional symbols pos/neg
pos: illustrates diffs between places - easy to understand,
summarises large amounts of data in a visual form,
easy to read cause symbol is proportional to its value
neg: difficult to calc actual value if its not shown, time consuming to construct
flow maps pos/neg
pos: scale/width pf lines are porportioanlk to its actual value - clear representation of data, immediate visual impression, clear location component,
neg: hard to draw, distance/direction might be distorted to achieve a clearer image - distorts actual data, flows could overlap and become hard to identify, hard to show starting point without overwhelming map
sphere of influence pos/neg
pos: shows differences of data between many places - good for comparisons, summarises lots of data in visual form - aids comprehension, easy top read
neg: time consuming to construct, size of symbol can cover location on the map, doesn’t show consistencies or reveal patterns
The size of the symbol may obscure the location of the traffic survey - 1
transects pos/neg
pos: can be compared to other cross sections, several transects from same starting point can still be compared
neg: a single one is useless - needs multiple to compare , exaggerated vertical scales can be misleading, only a small snapshot in time as data is constantly changing, time consuming to collect/accurately