U3 AOS2 Pt 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Define pragmatism

A

School of though in which foreign policy is influenced above all else by practical considerations, as opposed to moral principles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define idealism

A

School of though in which foreign policy is influenced above all else by moral principle, as opposed to practical considerations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

China’s cultivation of soft/cultural power in Africa

A

Offers cheaper TV
→ CGTV claims accounts for 10/24mil pay TV subs
→ CGTV plays in halls of Afr U

Education/scholarships
2003 2K → 2018 80K Afr students studying in Ch
Ch govt = largest prov of scholarships for Sfr students to study abroad (16%)

Impact: positive
→ 63% Afr view Ch influence on Afr as somewhat/very pos
→ 4 Afr st adopt Ch’s dev model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

China’s (failed) cultivation of soft/cultural power in Western states thru CIs

A

2019 530 CIs across 6 continents
→ 100mil non-Ch learning Mandarin

Impact: none + possibly negative bc SOFT POWER DEFICIT

2019 Aus launch investigation in CIs = poss violation of anti-foreign interference laws
→ NSW end all CIs + similar cases in US, UK, Fr + Den

2019 HR Watch Report condemn Ch for censoring pol topics (Tibet + Taiwan) + hiring based on party loyalty

2015 50% Aus prefer econ ties w Ch → 2021 31%
meanwhile 2015 27% prefer econ ties w US → 2021 59%
similar trend in SK while gap has simply widened in J + Ca polls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How has China used diplomacy?

A
  1. pursue EP → trade deals
    - Sep 2015 Xi invite Park to Ch mil parade @ TS → FTA Dec 2015
    - 2019 Abe visit Ch → $2.6bn trade deals (but spokesperson say monitoring HR situation)
  2. pursue RR → regional hegemon
    - Oct 2016 Duterte visit Ch → announce ‘separation’ from US + ‘I’ve realigned myself in your ideological flow’
    - Xi 5 meeting w Kim Mar 2018-July 2018 (bookend Moon + Trump) → NK prop depict Xi in gold circle surrounded by red during July 2019 visit
  3. pursue NS → sov claims + domestic image
    - Oct 2016 Duterte visit Ch → ignores UNCLOS ruling + cancels visit to contested isl
    - Nov 2020 Ch give Aus list of 14 grievances
  4. pursue IS → gain legit thru rel w other st
    - Sep 2015 Xi invite Park to Ch mil parade @ TS → show willingness to overlook HR record
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Xi’s interpretation of EP - “common prosperity”

A

Interpretation:
inc govt control over SOEs + redist $ to low-mid classes

Rationale:
wealth disparity
- inc wealth disp = wealthiest 1% own 30.6% of nat $ vs 20.9% 20 yrs ago
- 600mil ppl live on income $154/mo = X enough to rent in mid-sized cities
“peaceful rise” = unsus → need “peace thru strength”
- econ growth peak 2007 15% but in 6%s since 2014
- 2020-35 Ch lose 70 mil working-age adults + gain 130mil sr citizens → x3 age related spending by 2050
- wages inc 10% every yr since 2005 → MC expectation that this will cont → need to shift narr
Policy implications:
→ BRI primarily orchestrated by SOEs = success bc 2017 Ch construction activity = x6 of aid spent ($958mil)
→ govt fund 40% Xinhua → 11.7mil twitter followers despite twitter ban

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Liu He’s interpretation of EP - “peaceful rise”

A

Interpretation:
cont element of freedom in bus sector bc priv enterprise = instrumental to Ch’s econ success before

Rationale:
Success of “peaceful rise”
- GDP grow 10%+ every yr 1978-2014
- 1978 90% below pov line → <1% 2014 (800mil ppl lifted out of extreme pov)
- priv sector responsible for 60% GDP + 70% tech innovation

Inefficiency of SOEs:
- 50% corp debt but 22% GDP

Policy implications
→ cont open econ

(not current dominating interpretation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluate use of military power

A

A/t mil power = v successful at achieving idealistic goals but detrimental LT to prag goals
1. Taiwan
- 2017 1600 ballistic missiles in TS
- 2021 950 air incursions = x2 2020
- Oct 2021 149 aircraft in strike formation on Nat Dat Wkend
success = project ‘strong china’ image bc clear link to nationalism = good for NS BUT Tsai X recog 1992 Consensus = risks tacit trade rel + US $5.1bn arms deals w T 2020 = tangible NS risk

  1. Japan/ECS
    - 2013 est ADIZ
    - 2021 Ch CG auth to control foreign vessels/use weapons → approach + pursue J fishing vessels
    success = appear to have EC over SI = good for domestic image BUT invited x2 US B52 bombers Nov 2013 + 2019 $2.6bn bus deal = contingent on “stability in the ECS”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly